Qi-Bin Song1, Qi Wang1, Wei-Guo Hu1. 1. Qi-Bin Song, Qi Wang, Wei-Guo Hu, Department of Oncology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, Hubei Province, China.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the correlation between Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) status and the therapeutic effects of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and the association between KRAS mutation and clinical outcome in mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR MoAbs was investigated. Ten RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Progression-free survival and overall survival were used to assess the strength of the relationship between KRAS mutation and clinical outcome. RESULTS: In first-line treatment, survival benefit was confined to patients with wild-type KRAS. Chemotherapy regimens and angiogenesis inhibitor treatment influenced the results of the analysis. Wild-type KRAS mCRC patients did not seem to benefit from oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (PFS: HR = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.70-1.10; OS: HR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.82-1.04). Clinical benefit in mCRC patients was limited to therapeutic regimens which included anti-EGFR MoAbs and fluorouracil-based therapy (PFS: HR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.69-0.86; OS: HR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.75-0.95). When anti-EGFR MoAbs were used as second- or further-line treatment, clinical benefit was still confined to patients with wild-type KRAS. CONCLUSION: KRAS status is a potential predictive marker of clinical benefit due to anti-EGFR MoAb therapy in mCRC patients.
AIM: To investigate the correlation between Kirsten ratsarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) status and the therapeutic effects of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified and the association between KRAS mutation and clinical outcome in mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR MoAbs was investigated. Ten RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Progression-free survival and overall survival were used to assess the strength of the relationship between KRAS mutation and clinical outcome. RESULTS: In first-line treatment, survival benefit was confined to patients with wild-type KRAS. Chemotherapy regimens and angiogenesis inhibitor treatment influenced the results of the analysis. Wild-type KRAS mCRC patients did not seem to benefit from oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (PFS: HR = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.70-1.10; OS: HR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.82-1.04). Clinical benefit in mCRC patients was limited to therapeutic regimens which included anti-EGFR MoAbs and fluorouracil-based therapy (PFS: HR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.69-0.86; OS: HR = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.75-0.95). When anti-EGFR MoAbs were used as second- or further-line treatment, clinical benefit was still confined to patients with wild-type KRAS. CONCLUSION:KRAS status is a potential predictive marker of clinical benefit due to anti-EGFR MoAb therapy in mCRC patients.
Authors: Jean-Yves Douillard; Salvatore Siena; James Cassidy; Josep Tabernero; Ronald Burkes; Mario Barugel; Yves Humblet; György Bodoky; David Cunningham; Jacek Jassem; Fernando Rivera; Ilona Kocákova; Paul Ruff; Maria Błasińska-Morawiec; Martin Šmakal; Jean-Luc Canon; Mark Rother; Kelly S Oliner; Michael Wolf; Jennifer Gansert Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marc Peeters; Timothy Jay Price; Andrés Cervantes; Alberto F Sobrero; Michel Ducreux; Yevhen Hotko; Thierry André; Emily Chan; Florian Lordick; Cornelis J A Punt; Andrew H Strickland; Gregory Wilson; Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu; Laslo Roman; Eric Van Cutsem; Valentina Tzekova; Simon Collins; Kelly S Oliner; Alan Rong; Jennifer Gansert Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ludovic Barault; Nicolas Veyrie; Valerie Jooste; Delphine Lecorre; Caroline Chapusot; Jean-Marc Ferraz; Astrid Lièvre; Marion Cortet; Anne-Marie Bouvier; Patrick Rat; Patrick Roignot; Jean Faivre; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Francoise Piard Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: J Randolph Hecht; Edith Mitchell; Tarek Chidiac; Carroll Scroggin; Christopher Hagenstad; David Spigel; John Marshall; Allen Cohn; David McCollum; Philip Stella; Robert Deeter; Seta Shahin; Rafael G Amado Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rafael G Amado; Michael Wolf; Marc Peeters; Eric Van Cutsem; Salvatore Siena; Daniel J Freeman; Todd Juan; Robert Sikorski; Sid Suggs; Robert Radinsky; Scott D Patterson; David D Chang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-03-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jolien Tol; Miriam Koopman; Annemieke Cats; Cees J Rodenburg; Geert J M Creemers; Jolanda G Schrama; Frans L G Erdkamp; Allert H Vos; Cees J van Groeningen; Harm A M Sinnige; Dirk J Richel; Emile E Voest; Jeroen R Dijkstra; Marianne E Vink-Börger; Ninja F Antonini; Linda Mol; Johan H J M van Krieken; Otilia Dalesio; Cornelis J A Punt Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-02-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Julia Sánchez-Gundín; Ana María Fernández-Carballido; Lidia Martínez-Valdivieso; Dolores Barreda-Hernández; Ana Isabel Torres-Suárez Journal: Int J Med Sci Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 3.738