Literature DB >> 31020609

Phase I study of the anti-heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor antibody U3-1565 with cetuximab in patients with cetuximab- or panitumumab-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer.

Takako Eguchi Nakajima1, Narikazu Boku2, Ayako Doi2, Hiroyuki Arai2, Takuro Mizukami2, Yoshiki Horie2, Naoki Izawa2, Mami Hirakawa2, Takashi Ogura2, Takashi Tsuda2, Yu Sunakawa2.   

Abstract

KRAS wild-type colorectal cancers initially responsive to anti-endothelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies [cetuximab (Cetu)/panitumumab (Pani)] develop acquired resistance. Overexpression of EGFR ligands such as heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) may be one resistance mechanism. This phase I study of U3-1565, anti-HB-EGF antibody, and Cetu combination therapy enrolled patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer who had received two ≤ regimens with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and Cetu/Pani and had disease progression on Cetu/Pani. Recommended dose (RD) was determined in the 1st stage, followed by evaluation of efficacy at the RD level in the 2nd-stage. Cetu was given at a loading dose of 400 mg/m2 followed by weekly infusions of 250 mg/m2 in levels 1 and 0. U3-1565 was administered at a loading dose of 24 mg/m2 followed by biweekly infusions of 16 mg/m2 in level 1 and 16-12 mg/m2 in level 0. Twenty-two patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed among three patients in level 1 in the first stage, which was determined as RD. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 59.1%; those in ≥5% of patients were anemia, γ-GTP elevation, and acneiform rash. Overall response rate was 0.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.0%-15.4%] and disease control was achieved in 17 patients (77.3%, 95% CI: 54.6%-92.2%). Median progression-free survival time was 85.0 days (95% CI: 54.0-91.0) and median survival time was 196 days (95% CI: 113.0-306.0). RD was determined as level 1. The efficacy of this combination therapy after progression on Cetu/Pani was negligible. Trial Registration: UMIN000013006.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-HB-EGF antibody; Cetuximab re-challenge; Colorectal cancer; Phase I; U3-1565

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31020609     DOI: 10.1007/s10637-019-00782-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  17 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Pan-Asian adapted ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a JSMO-ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KACO, MOS, SSO and TOS.

Authors:  T Yoshino; D Arnold; H Taniguchi; G Pentheroudakis; K Yamazaki; R-H Xu; T W Kim; F Ismail; I B Tan; K-H Yeh; A Grothey; S Zhang; J B Ahn; M Y Mastura; D Chong; L-T Chen; S Kopetz; T Eguchi-Nakajima; H Ebi; A Ohtsu; A Cervantes; K Muro; J Tabernero; H Minami; F Ciardiello; J-Y Douillard
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Cetuximab rechallenge in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: how to come away from acquired resistance?

Authors:  D Santini; B Vincenzi; R Addeo; C Garufi; G Masi; M Scartozzi; A Mancuso; A M Frezza; O Venditti; M Imperatori; G Schiavon; G Bronte; G Cicero; F Recine; E Maiello; S Cascinu; A Russo; A Falcone; G Tonini
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 4.  Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: focus on potential molecular mechanisms of drug resistance.

Authors:  Carolien Boeckx; Marc Baay; An Wouters; Pol Specenier; Jan B Vermorken; Marc Peeters; Filip Lardon
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-07-02

5.  Randomized, phase II study of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor inhibitor IMC-A12, with or without cetuximab, in patients with cetuximab- or panitumumab-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Diane Lauren Reidy; Efsevia Vakiani; Marwan G Fakih; Muhammad Wasif Saif; Joel Randolph Hecht; Noah Goodman-Davis; Ellen Hollywood; Jinru Shia; Jonathan Schwartz; Kumari Chandrawansa; Aruna Dontabhaktuni; Hagop Youssoufian; David B Solit; Leonard B Saltz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A novel predictive strategy by immunohistochemical analysis of four EGFR ligands in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with anti-EGFR antibodies.

Authors:  Michihiro Yoshida; Takaya Shimura; Mikinori Sato; Masahide Ebi; Takahiro Nakazawa; Hiromitsu Takeyama; Takashi Joh
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a post-hoc analysis of tumour dynamics in the final RAS wild-type subgroup of this randomised open-label phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Sebastian Stintzing; Dominik P Modest; Lisa Rossius; Markus M Lerch; Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal; Thomas Decker; Alexander Kiani; Ursula Vehling-Kaiser; Salah-Eddin Al-Batran; Tobias Heintges; Christian Lerchenmüller; Christoph Kahl; Gernot Seipelt; Frank Kullmann; Martina Stauch; Werner Scheithauer; Swantje Held; Clemens Giessen-Jung; Markus Moehler; Andreas Jagenburg; Thomas Kirchner; Andreas Jung; Volker Heinemann
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Marc Peeters; Salvatore Siena; Yves Humblet; Alain Hendlisz; Bart Neyns; Jean-Luc Canon; Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Joan Maurel; Gary Richardson; Michael Wolf; Rafael G Amado
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Nuclear EGFR contributes to acquired resistance to cetuximab.

Authors:  C Li; M Iida; E F Dunn; A J Ghia; D L Wheeler
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.