| Literature DB >> 23028894 |
Yiu-fai Cheung1, Wei Yu, Shu-na Li, Wendy W M Lam, Yuen-chi Ho, Sophia J Wong, Godfrey C F Chan, Shau-yin Ha.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Performance of the left ventricle during exercise stress in thalassaemia patients is uncertain. We aimed to explore the phenomenon of dynamic dyssynchrony and assess contractile reserve in patients with beta-thalassaemia major and determine their relationships with myocardial iron load. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23028894 PMCID: PMC3445473 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045265
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of subjects.
| Patients | Controls | p | |
| (n = 32) | (n = 17) | ||
| Age | 26.8±6.9 | 25.3±4.8 | 0.43 |
| Sex (male:female) | 16∶16 | 7∶10 | 0.76 |
| Body weight (kg) | 51.9±9.9 | 58.3±11.2 | 0.045 |
| Body height (cm) | 159.4±8.7 | 167.3±7.9 | 0.003 |
| Body surface area (m2) | 1.51±0.17 | 1.65±0.17 | 0.013 |
| Co-morbidities | Hypogonadism (n = 20) | – | |
| Hepatitis C infection (n = 9) | |||
| Diabetes mellitus (n = 6) | |||
| Hypothyroidism (n = 6) | |||
| Hypoparathyroidism(n = 1) |
Statistically significant.
Comparisons of echocardiographic parameters between patients and controls at baseline and during supine bicycle exercise.
| Baseline | Exercise | p | |||||
| Patients | Controls | Patients | Controls | Group | Exercise | Interaction | |
| (n = 32) | (n = 17) | (n = 32) | (n = 17) | factor | factor | ||
|
| |||||||
| s (cm/s) | 6.2±2.1 | 7.9±1.5 | 10.1±2.8 | 11.0±2.0 | 0.006 | <0.001 | 0.38 |
| e (cm/s) | 9.9±3.2 | 10.3±2.0 | 13.2±3.2 | 13.1±1.9 | 0.87 | <0.001 | 0.72 |
| a (cm/s) | 4.0±1.9 | 4.2±1.5 | 7.8±4.0 | 7.4±3.7 | 0.87 | <0.001 | 0.67 |
| e/a | 2.8±1.0 | 2.8±1.3 | 2.2±1.3 | 2.3±1.3 | 0.91 | 0.033 | 1.0 |
| IVA (cm/s2) | 1.1±0.4 | 1.3±0.5 | 2.1±0.6 | 2.9±1.0 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.019 |
|
| |||||||
| Indexed EDV (ml/m2) | 70.2±14.7 | 66.6±9.6 | 61.5±10.0 | 67.0±13 | 0.73 | 0.11 | 0.08 |
| Indexed ESV (ml/m2) | 31.8±8.0 | 28.5±4.1 | 26.9±4.9 | 24.9±5.0 | 0.037 | 0.001 | 0.63 |
| EF (%) | 54.8±5.3 | 57.1±3.8 | 56.1±4.5 | 62.6±4.7 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.042 |
| Indexed SV (ml/m2) | 38.5±8.6 | 38.1±6.7 | 34.6±6.7 | 42.1±9.6 | 0.036 | 0.98 | 0.021 |
| Cardiac index (l/min/m2) | 3.1±0.9 | 2.8±0.7 | 4.4±1.0 | 5.4±1.5 | 0.098 | <0.001 | 0.007 |
|
| 79±13 | 74±13 | 128±15 | 129±16 | 0.47 | <0.001 | 0.32 |
Statistically significant.
a, mitral annular late diastolic myocardial tissue velocity; e, mitral annual early diastolic myocardial tissue velocity; EDV, end-diastolic volume; ESV, end-systolic volume; IVA, isovolumic acceleration; s, mitral annular systolic myocardial tissue velocity; SV, stroke volume.
Exercise testing parameters.
| Patients | Controls | p | |
| (n = 32) | (n = 17) | ||
| Baseline heart rate(/min) | 79±13 | 74±13 | 0.18 |
| Peak heart rate (/min) | 128±15 | 129±16 | 0.86 |
| Baseline SBP (mmHg) | 114±9 | 122±11 | 0.01 |
| Baseline DBP (mmHg) | 70±7 | 73±10 | 0.18 |
| Peak SBP (mmHg) | 146±14 | 159±21 | 0.052 |
| Peak DBP (mmHg) | 77±9 | 81±11 | 0.22 |
| Duration of exerciseto achieve targetheart rate (minutes) | 11±3 | 20±4 | <0.001 |
Statistically significant.
DBP, diastolic blood pressure, SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Differences (Δ) between exercise and baseline echocardiographic parameters.
| Patients | Controls | p | |
| (n = 32) | (n = 17) | ||
|
| |||
| Δs (cm/s) | 4.0±2.3 | 3.1±2.6 | 0.26 |
| Δe (cm/s) | 3.3±3.7 | 2.8±2.2 | 0.66 |
| Δa (cm/s) | 3.8±3.5 | 3.3±3.5 | 0.61 |
| Δe/a | −0.0±1.3 | −0.6±1.7 | 1.0 |
| ΔIVA (cm/s2) | 0.9±0.5 | 1.6±0.8 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Δindexed EDV (ml/m2) | −8.7±10.7 | 0.4±5.3 | 0.002 |
| Δindexed ESV (ml/m2) | −4.8±7.5 | −3.6±3.7 | 0.52 |
| ΔEF (%) | 1.2±7.1 | 5.5±5.0 | 0.032 |
| Δindexed SV (ml/m2) | −3.9±6.7 | 4.0±5.1 | <0.001 |
| Δcardiac index (l/min/m2) | 1.4±1.0 | 2.6±1.1 | <0.001 |
Statistically significant.
Abbreviations as in table 2.
Figure 1Scatter plots showing (a) baseline left ventricular systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI) at rest, (b) SDI during exercise when target heart rate was reached, and (c) exercise-baseline differences in SDI in patients and controls.
Solid horizontal lines represent the mean, while the dotted line represents the upper limit of normal LV SDI.
Figure 2Regional volume curves, normalized to individual maximum, of the 16 LV segments over a cardiac cycle.
The upper panels show synchronous contraction of the 16 left ventricular segments in a control at rest and during exercise, while the lower panels demonstrate dyssynchronous contraction at rest and its exaggeration during exercise in a thalassaemia patient.
Figure 3Scatter plot showing a negative correlation between exercise-baseline differences in left ventricular (LV) systolic dyssynchrony index (SDI) and exercise-baseline differences in (a) LV ejection fraction (EF) and (b) indexed LV stroke volume (closed circles: patients, open circles: controls).
Figure 4Line plot showing impaired contractile reserve in patients as reflected by the smaller increment of left ventricular myocardial isovolumic acceleration (IVA) with escalating heart rate during exercise in patients than controls.
The error bars represent standard errors of means.