Literature DB >> 14736445

Intra-left ventricular electromechanical asynchrony. A new independent predictor of severe cardiac events in heart failure patients.

Hugues Bader1, Stephane Garrigue, Stephane Lafitte, Sylvain Reuter, Pierre Jaïs, Michel Haïssaguerre, Jacques Bonnet, Jacques Clementy, Raymond Roudaut.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the electromechanical parameters, using tissue Doppler echocardiography, as potential independent predictors of heart failure (HF) worsening.
BACKGROUND: Ventricular conduction disorders worsen the prognosis for HF patients. However, the relationships between the QRS width and morphology, hemodynamic parameters, and presence and magnitude of intra-left ventricular (LV) and inter-ventricular (V) asynchrony have not been well clarified.
METHOD: A total of 104 patients with an LV ejection fraction (EF) </=45% and stabilized HF, without myocardial infarction (MI), underwent echocardiography coupled with tissue Doppler imaging and were followed for one year. The protocol analyzed the incidence of worsening HF (hospitalization for cardiac decompensation). Inter-V and regional electromechanical delays for the anterior, septal, inferior, and lateral LV walls were correlated with the QRS morphology and duration. The intra-LV and inter-V asynchrony values of these patients were compared with those of healthy subjects matched by gender and age criteria to determine the respective normal ranges.
RESULTS: The presence of intra-LV (but not inter-V) asynchrony was identified as an independent predictor of severe cardiac events (hazard ratio 3.39, p < 0.0001), independent of the LVEF and QRS width. Of patients with a QRS width <120 ms (55%; n = 57), 56% presented with major intra-LV asynchrony and 12% with inter-V asynchrony. Intra-LV asynchrony was observed in 84% of left bundle branch block patients, but also in 83% of right bundle branch block patients (p = NS). There was a poor correlation between the QRS width and intra-LV or inter-V asynchrony (r = 0.36, p = NS and r = 0.43, p = 0.05, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: In HF patients without MI, patients with intra-LV asynchrony are those with a significantly higher risk of cardiac events, independent of the QRS width and LVEF. Accordingly, such patients should be more actively identified for early intensive treatment and survey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14736445     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.08.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  94 in total

Review 1.  Transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome in dyssynchronous heart failure and CRT.

Authors:  Andreas S Barth; Khalid Chakir; David A Kass; Gordon F Tomaselli
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Acute and chronic response to CRT in narrow QRS patients.

Authors:  Tim Donahue; Imran Niazi; Angel Leon; Michael Stucky; Keith Herrmann
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Permanent direct his bundle pacing does not induce ventricular dyssynchrony unlike conventional right ventricular apical pacing. An intrapatient acute comparison study.

Authors:  Domenico Catanzariti; Massimiliano Maines; Claudio Cemin; Gianpaolo Broso; Tiziana Marotta; Giuseppe Vergara
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Gated blood pool tomoscintigraphy with 4-dimensional optical flow motion analysis quantifies left ventricular mechanical activation and synchronization.

Authors:  Claudia Dinu; Gregory Klein; Sophie Morestin-Cadet; Marc Froissart; Benoît Diebold; Jean-Yves LeHeuzey; Michel Paillard; Thomas Lavergne; Jean-François Toussaint
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Tissue synchronisation imaging accurately measures left ventricular dyssynchrony and predicts response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

Authors:  Nico R Van de Veire; Gabe B Bleeker; Johan De Sutter; Claudia Ypenburg; Eduard R Holman; Ernst E van der Wall; Ernst E van der Wal; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-02-19       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Insights into the effects of contraction dyssynchrony on global left ventricular mechano-energetic function.

Authors:  Lauren Johnson; Marc A Simon; Michael R Pinsky; Sanjeev G Shroff
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Electrophysiological consequences of dyssynchronous heart failure and its restoration by resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Takeshi Aiba; Geoffrey G Hesketh; Andreas S Barth; Ting Liu; Samantapudi Daya; Khalid Chakir; Veronica Lea Dimaano; Theodore P Abraham; Brian O'Rourke; Fadi G Akar; David A Kass; Gordon F Tomaselli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony assessment in long-standing type II diabetes mellitus patients with normal gated SPECT-MPI.

Authors:  Dharmender Malik; Bhagwant Mittal; Ashwani Sood; Madan Parmar; Gurvinder Kaur; Ajay Bahl
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Left ventricular synchronicity is impaired in patients with active acromegaly.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Kırış; Cihangir Erem; Oğuzhan Ekrem Turan; Nadim Civan; Gülhanım Kırış; Irfan Nuhoğlu; Abdulselam Ilter; Halil Onder Ersöz; Merih Kutlu
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.633

10.  Longitudinal function and ventricular dyssynchrony are restored in children with pulmonary stenosis after percutaneous balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty.

Authors:  Ragab A Mahfouz; Tamer M Moustafa; Mohammad Gouda; Marwa Gad
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.