| Literature DB >> 23028472 |
Natacha Turck1, Xavier Robin, Nadia Walter, Catherine Fouda, Alexandre Hainard, Roman Sztajzel, Ghislaine Wagner, Denis F Hochstrasser, Joan Montaner, Pierre R Burkhard, Jean-Charles Sanchez.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ability to accu<span class="Species">rately determine time of stroke onset remains challenging. We hypothesized that an early biomarker characterized by a rapid increase in blood after stroke onset may help defining better the time window during which an acute stroke patient may be candidate for intravenous thrombolysis or other intravascular procedures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23028472 PMCID: PMC3444482 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043830
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
General characteristics of the 2 cohorts.
| Cohort 1 | Cohort 2 | ||
| Controls | Stroke | Stroke | |
| n | 132 | 103 | 155 |
| Age | |||
| Mean ± SD | 64.2±15.0 | 66.7±14.5 | 72.2±11.0 |
| Median (Min-Max) | 67.5 (25–88) | 67.0 (33–89) | 74.00 (45–97) |
| Gender | |||
| Male n (%) | 76 (57.6) | 57 (55.3) | 86 (55.5) |
| Time onset of symptoms Median |
| ||
| (Min.)Mean ± SD | 896.4±617.0 | ||
| (Range) | 960.0 (5.0–2130.0) | ||
| NIHSS basal | |||
| 0–7, n (%) | 62 (70.5) | 5 (3.2) | |
| >7, n (%) | 26 (29.5) | 150 (96.8) | |
| NA | 15 | ||
| Atrial Fibrillation | |||
| Yes, n (%) | 33 (32.0) | 62 (40.0) | |
| NA | 4 | ||
| Hypertension | |||
| Yes, n (%) | 65 (63.1) | NA | |
| Alcohol | |||
| Yes, n (%) | 2 (1.9) | NA | |
| Tobacco | |||
| No, n (%) | 58 (56.3) | 115 (74.2) | |
| NA | 13 | ||
| Diabetes Mellitus | |||
| Yes, n (%) | 13 (12.7) | 50 (32.2) | |
| NA | 6 | ||
NA: not available.
: All patients were collected within the first 3 h after symptom onset.
Detailed characteristics of the stroke patients (cohort 1).
| Stroke patients | |||
| Early | Late | p-value | |
| n | 22 | 81 | |
| Subtypes | |||
| Hemorrhagic | 2 | 7 | |
| Ischemic | 16 | 50 | |
| TIA | 1 | 18 | |
| SUO | 3 | 6 | |
| Age | 0.28 | ||
| Mean ± SD | 69.9±14.0 | 65.8±14.6 | |
| Median (Min-Max) | 72.0 (36.0–89.0) | 66.0 (33.0–89.0) | |
| Gender | 0.47 | ||
| Male, n (%) | 14 (63.6) | 43 (53.1) | |
| Time onset of symptoms (Min.) | |||
| Mean ± SD | 120.0±42.8 | 1107.2±523.6 | |
| Median (Range) | 130.0 (5.0–180.0) | 1440.0 (190.0–2130.0) | |
| NIHSS basal | <.0001 | ||
| 0–7, n (%) | 7 (33.3) | 55 (82.1) | |
| >7, n (%) | 14 (66.7) | 12 (17.9) | |
| Atrial Fibrillation | 0.32 | ||
| Yes, n (%) | 9 (40.9) | 24 (29.6) | |
| Hypertension | 0.45 | ||
| Yes, n (%) | 12 (54.5) | 53 (65.4) | |
| Tobacco | 0.45 | ||
| No, n (%) | 10 (45.5) | 48 (59.3) | |
| Diabetes Mellitus | 0.48 | ||
| Yes, n (%) | 4 (18.2) | 9 (11.1) | |
: Fischer exact tests.
Among them, 3 patients presented initially an ischemia and a hemorrhage as a secondary event.
Among them, 7 patients presented initially an ischemia and a hemorrhage as a secondary event.
ration between stroke and control patients. Further analyses were restricted to the 5 best molecules (GST-π, DJ-1, NT-pro-BNP, NDKA and IL-6).
blood concentration of the 29 biomarkers between stroke (N = 103) and control patients (N = 132) in cohort 1.
| Molecules | Controls | Stroke | p value |
| Mean± SD | Mean± SD | ||
| Median (Min.- Max.) | Median (Min.- Max.) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| MMP-3 | 17.7±15.5 | 14.0±14.6 | .008 |
| 13.4 (1.7–104.0) | 10.7 (0.0–12.2) | ||
| UFD-1 | 7.3±20.4 | 7.7±17.1 | 0.01 |
| 2.1 (0.0–147.0) | 2.8(0.0–143.0) | ||
| IL-1ra | 76.1±234.2 | 312.5±1321.4 | .012 |
| 15.2 (0.0–1758.4) | 34.0 (0.0–9411.7) | ||
| IL-8 | 6.4±69.0 | 65.4±366.7 | .015 |
| 0.0 (0.0–786.3) | 0.0 (0.0–3349.9) | ||
| S100β | 12.5±34.4 | 40.3±87.9 | .015 |
| 0.0 (0.0–339.4) | 4.65 (0.0–505.6) | ||
| CRP | 7.2±35.7 | 8.1±14.7 | .017 |
| 1.8 (0.0–400.0) | 3.12 (0.0–107.7) | ||
| Troponin I | 40.3±24.7 | 102.6±674.4 | .017 |
| 20.0 (0.0–2790) | 20.0 (0.0–685.0) | ||
| H-FABP | 2.1±2.1 | 4.1±8.0 | .024 |
| 1.5 (0.2–15.7) | 1.8 (0.07–74.1) | ||
| E-selectin | 42.5±30.9 | 34.5±16.2 | .046 |
| 35.7 (11.7–233.5) | 32.5 (10.9–98.2) | ||
| VEGF | 127.8±812.1 | 131.3±282.0 | 0.15 |
| 15.7 (0.0–9261.5) | 32.1 (0.0–2177.8) | ||
| G-CSF | 28.2±128.6 | 35.6±106.6 | 0.17 |
| 12.6 (0.0–1470.2) | 15.9 (0.0–996.8) | ||
| IL-9 | 50.6±326.3 | 74.8±262.3 | 0.18 |
| 1.0 (0.0–3670.8) | 1.7 (0.0–1575.1) | ||
| IL-10 | 72.1±311.7 | 77.8±199.3 | 0.22 |
| 38.6 (0.0–3571.9) | 42.9 (0.0–1833.1) | ||
| IFN-γ | 17.9±79.0 | 59.3±269.6 | 0.22 |
| 4.0 (0.0–715.0) | 5.6 (0.0–2464.8) | ||
| VCAM | 620.2±200.4 | 663.9±241.1 | 0.29 |
| 589.8 (95.5–1321.5) | 615.0 (283.7–1409.0) | ||
| IL-1b | 2.6±13.5 | 24.9±206.7 | 0.35 |
| 0.8 (0.0–125.1) | 0.8 (0.0–2087.6) | ||
| P-Selectin | 119.0±52.6 | 151.0±131.9 | 0.37 |
| 117.7 (37.4–364.0) | 115.7 (35.4–812.1) | ||
| MMP-1 | 5.0±5.7 | 4.2±4.0 | 0.37 |
| 3.5 (0.3–47.0) | 3.5 (0.1–26.6) | ||
| IP-10 | 784.1±908.3 | 732.6±779.5 | 0.65 |
| 510.4 (15.5–8016.1) | 500.3 (0.0–4747.1) | ||
| MIP-1b | 132.1±112.1 | 143.3±206.8 | 0.67 |
| 109.8 (5.0–1032.9) | 110.7 (3.7–2005.4) | ||
| ICAM | 270.1±139.9 | 254.1±101.1 | 0.68 |
| 257.7 (47.2–1117.5) | 250.4 (83.4–566.7) | ||
| TNF-α | 24.2±147.9 | 72.0±349.7 | 0.72 |
| 6.1 (0.0–1598.0) | 6.4 (0.0–2925.5) | ||
| MIP-1a | 65.7±747.3 | 10.6±86.5 | 0.76 |
| 0.0 (0.0–8521.2) | 0.0 (0.0–873.4) | ||
| MCP-1α | 84.8±80.4 | 104.2±241.0 | 0.91 |
| 63.6 (5.3–514.6) | 62.6 (7.8–2397.7) |
Significant concentration was set at 0.002 after Bonferroni correction (Mann-Whitney U tests, two-tailed tests).
Blood concentration of the 5 best molecules in early and late stroke patients.
| Molecules | Early stroke | Late stroke | p value |
| Mean± SD | Mean± SD | ||
| Median (Min.- Max.) | Median (Min.- Max.) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| NT-proBNP | 725.4±1020.1 | 1385.9±2385.9 | 0.36 |
| 299.0 (20.0–4251.0) | 429.0 (20.0–10776.0) | ||
| IL-6 | 21.0±28.5 | 117.6±559.2 | 0.18 |
| 9.8 (0.0–110.1) | 6.8 (0.0–4366.9) |
Significant concentration was set at 0.01 after Bonferroni correction (Mann-Whitney U tests, two-tailed tests).
Figure 1Time course of the blood concentrations of GST-π, NDKA, DJ-1, NT-proBNP and IL-6 after stroke onset.
The grey dashed lines correspond to the median concentration of the molecules in the control patients. The grey lines connect the median of the box plots. 0–3 h: N = 22, 3–6 h: N = 15, 6–12 h: N = 8, 12–24 h: N = 45 and 24–36 h: N = 13. Note that there is no overlap between the different subgroup of times and that each patient has only one blood sampling within the 36 h after stroke onset.
Clinical performances of the 3 best molecules for discriminating early (blood sampling between 0 and 3 h after symptoms onset, N = 22) vs. late stroke patients (blood sampling strictly after 3 h, N = 81).
| GST-π | NDKA | DJ-1 | ||
| AUC (95%CI) | 0.79 | 0.68 (0.57–0.79) | 0.66 (0.54–0.78) | |
|
| CO (ug/L) | 39.6 | 4.4 | 60.3 |
| Se/Sp (%) | 68.2/82.5 | 91.0/44.0 | 86.4/50.0 | |
| OR | 10.1 | 8.0 | 6.4 | |
| NPV/PPV (%) | 90.4/51.7 | 94.7/30.8 | 93.0/32.2 | |
|
| CO (ug/L) | 17.7 | 4.4 | 50.8 |
| Se/Sp (%) | 90.9/50.0 | 91.0/44.0 | 90.9/42.5 | |
| OR | 10.0 | 8.0 | 7.4 | |
| NPV/PPV (%) | 95.2/33.3 | 94.7/30.8 | 94.4/30.3 | |
|
| CO (ug/L) | 65.2 | 23.1 | 443.0 |
| Se/Sp (%) | 50.0/91.2 | 18.2/90.1 | 18.2/97.5 | |
| OR | 10.4 | 2.0 | 8.6 | |
| NPV/PPV (%) | 86.9/61.1 | 80.2/33.3 | 81.2/66.7 |
NPV: negative predictive value/PPV: positive predictive value.
The AUC of GST-π was significantly better than AUC of NDKA and DJ-1 (p = 0.034 and 0.020 respectively). No significant difference was obtained between AUC of NDKA and of DJ-1 (p = 0.63).
An AUC above 0.74 was estimated as significant (significance 0.05 and power 0.95, made with Power tests/Sample size item from pROC software).
Clinical performances of the molecules for discriminating tPA treated (N = 12) vs. ineligible patients (N = 104).
| High Se | High Sp | ||||||
| Molecules | AUC | CO | Se/Sp | OR | CO | Se/Sp | OR |
| (95%CI) | (units) | (%) | (units) | (%) | |||
| GST-π | 0.83 | 17.7 | 91.7/45.6 | 9.3 | 65.2 | 58.3/89.3 | 11.7 |
| (0.71–0.95) | |||||||
| NDKA | 0.69 | 4.4 | 91.7/40.8 | 8.6 | 23.1 | 16.7/89.3 | 1.7 |
| (0.57–0.82) | |||||||
| DJ-1 | 0.62 | 50.8 | 91.7/37.3 | 6.6 | 443.0 | 8.3/95.1 | 1.7 |
| (0.48–0.75) | |||||||
The AUC of GST-π was significantly better than AUC of DJ-1 (p = 0.016). No significant difference was obtained between GST-π vs. NDKA (p = 0.11) and NDKA vs. DJ-1 (p = 0.14).
An AUC above 0.80 was estimated as significant (significance 0.05 and power 0.95, made with Power tests/Sample size item from pROC software).