| Literature DB >> 23028341 |
Xiaobo Yang1, Jielin Sun, Yong Gao, Aihua Tan, Haiying Zhang, Yanling Hu, Junjie Feng, Xue Qin, Sha Tao, Zhuo Chen, Seong-Tae Kim, Tao Peng, Ming Liao, Xiaoling Lin, Zengfeng Zhang, Minzhong Tang, Li Li, Linjian Mo, Zhengjia Liang, Deyi Shi, Zhang Huang, Xianghua Huang, Ming Liu, Qian Liu, Shijun Zhang, Jeffrey M Trent, S Lilly Zheng, Jianfeng Xu, Zengnan Mo.
Abstract
Complement C3 and C4 play key roles in the main physiological activities of complement system, and their deficiencies or over-expression are associated with many clinical infectious or immunity diseases. A two-stage genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed for serum levels of C3 and C4. The first stage was conducted in 1,999 healthy Chinese men, and the second stage was performed in an additional 1,496 subjects. We identified two SNPs, rs3753394 in CFH gene and rs3745567 in C3 gene, that are significantly associated with serum C3 levels at a genome-wide significance level (P = 7.33 × 10(-11) and P = 1.83 × 10(-9), respectively). For C4, one large genomic region on chromosome 6p21.3 is significantly associated with serum C4 levels. Two SNPs (rs1052693 and rs11575839) were located in the MHC class I area that include HLA-A, HLA-C, and HLA-B genes. Two SNPs (rs2075799 and rs2857009) were located 5' and 3' of C4 gene. The other four SNPs, rs2071278, rs3763317, rs9276606, and rs241428, were located in the MHC class II region that includes HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB, and HLA-DQB genes. The combined P-values for those eight SNPs ranged from 3.19 × 10(-22) to 5.62 × 10(-97). HBsAg-positive subjects have significantly lower C3 and C4 protein concentrations compared with HBsAg-negative subjects (P<0.05). Our study is the first GWAS report which shows genetic components influence the levels of complement C3 and C4. Our significant findings provide novel insights of their related autoimmune, infectious diseases, and molecular mechanisms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23028341 PMCID: PMC3441730 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002916
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Genet ISSN: 1553-7390 Impact factor: 5.917
General characteristic of the two-stage GWAS study subjects.
| Characteristic | First stage | Second stage |
|
| N | 1999 | 1496 | |
| Age (years) | 37.54±11.10 | 37.31±10.80 | 0.54 |
| Smoking | |||
| Yes | 1015 (50.8) | 771 (51.5) | 0.66 |
| No | 984 (49.2) | 725 (48.5) | |
| Body mass index (kg.m−2) | 23.31±3.44 | 23.46±3.34 | 0.18 |
t-Test was used to compare means between the first and the second stages.
Chi-square test was used to compare the differences in categorized variables.
Figure 1Manhattan plot of genome-wide association analyses for C3 level.
X-axis shows chromosomal positions. Y-axis shows –log10 P-values from linear regression adjusted for age, smoking, and logBMI. The horizontal solid line indicates the preset threshold of P = 5×10−8.
SNPs associated with C3 and C4 levels from two-stage GWAS study in Chinese population.
| SNPs | Chr (Position) | Genes | Gene regions | Minor Allele/Major Allele | First Stage (N = 1999) | Second Stage (N = 1496) | Combined (N = 3495) | |||||||||
| MAF | Mean levels (g/L) |
| MAF | Mean levels (g/L) |
| β(SE) |
| |||||||||
| aa | Aa | AA | aa | Aa | AA | |||||||||||
| C3 | ||||||||||||||||
| rs3753394 | 1(194887540) |
| promoter | C/T | 0.43 | 1.16 | 1.13 | 1.08 | 5.79×10−13 | 0.44 | 1.31 | 1.26 | 1.20 | 1.08×10−3 | −0.05(0.01) | 7.33×10−11 |
| rs3745567 | 19 (6641771) |
| intron | T/C | 0.06 | 0.93 | 1.06 | 1.13 | 9.32×10−9 | 0.07 | 1.07 | 1.16 | 1.26 | 3.58×10−4 | 0.09(0.01) | 1.83×10−9 |
| C4 | ||||||||||||||||
| rs1052693 | 6 (30984131) |
| 3′ | G/A | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 3.26×10−10 | 0.34 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 7.48×10−22 | 0.10(0.01) | 3.01×10−48 |
| rs11575839 | 6 (31665770) |
| 5′ | A/G | 0.05 | 0.47 | 0.40 | 0.31 | 9.70×10−35 | 0.06 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.32 | 2.55×10−20 | −0.23(0.01) | 1.22×10−54 |
| rs2075799 | 6 (31886508) |
| 5′ | T/C | 0.20 | 0.40 | 0.36 | 0.30 | 1.08×10−49 | 0.20 | 0.47 | 0.36 | 0.30 | 2.53×10−48 | −0.17(0.01) | 5.62×10−97 |
| rs2857009 | 6 (32127724) |
| 3′ | G/C | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 3.46×10−24 | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.34 | 3.04×10−10 | 0.08(0.01) | 1.43×10−22 |
| rs2071278 | 6 (32273422) |
| 5′ | G/A | 0.27 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.30 | 3.48×10−29 | 0.28 | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.30 | 7.86×10−39 | −0.13(0.01) | 4.25×10−72 |
| rs3763317 | 6 (32484766) |
| 5′ | C/T | 0.37 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 1.88×10−17 | 0.38 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.38 | 2.10×10−32 | 0.12(0.01) | 9.21×10−66 |
| rs9276606 | 6 (32844673) |
| 3′ | T/A | 0.15 | 0.39 | 0.34 | 0.31 | 2.33×10−14 | 0.15 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 2.90×10−10 | −0.09(0.01) | 3.19×10−22 |
| rs241428 | 6 (32912048) |
| 3′ | G/T | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 3.64×10−12 | 0.09 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.34 | 6.99×10−39 | 0.23(0.01) | 9.12×10−83 |
. Genomic position is based on NCBI build 36.
. aa indicates serum complement levels for homozygous carriers of minor alleles, Aa indicates for heterozygous carriers, and AA indicates for homozygous carriers of major alleles.
. P values andβ-coefficient are based on multi-linear regression analysis for an addictive effect, and adjusted for age, smoking, and logBMI. The combined P s are calculated based on the regression model, adjusting for the covariates and stage information.
. The presented C4 levels were back-transformed.
Figure 2Manhattan plot of genome-wide association analyses for C4 level.
X-axis shows chromosomal positions. Y-axis shows −log10 Pvalues from linear regression adjusted for age and logBMI. C4 level are log-transformed and fit for a normal distribution. The horizontal solid line indicates the preset threshold of P=5×10−8.
Figure 3Association of serum C4 levels with SNPs at 6p21.3.
X-axis shows base positions from 30,900 Kb to 32,950 Kb. Y-axis shows –log10 P-values from linear regression adjusted for age and logBMI. C4 level are log-transformed and fit for a normal distribution. The horizontal solid line indicates the preset threshold of P = 5×10−8. The bottom panels describe all genes in the region.
Quantitative variation of serum C4 levels with C4 gene copy numbers among 100 healthy subjects.
| Copy numbers | N | Percent (%) | Serum levels (g/L) |
|
| 2 | 3 | 3.0 | 0.16±0.03 | 5.06×10−6 |
| 3 | 19 | 19.0 | 0.26±0.01 | 1.31×10−5 |
| 4 | 56 | 56.0 | 0.33±0.01 | Refer. |
| 5 | 16 | 16.0 | 0.37±0.01 | 2.51×10−2 |
| 6 | 3 | 3.0 | 0.40±0.03 | 7.29×10−2 |
| 7,8 | 3 | 3.0 | 0.48±0.04 | 8.24×10−5 |
| Total | 100 | 100.0 | 0.32±0.08 |
ANOVA analysis was used to compare the serum C4 levels among groups with various copies of C4 gene dose; Men carrying 4 copies of C4 gene was used as the reference group.
Total F value = 17.345, P value = 3.94×10−12 with degree of freedom of 5.