Literature DB >> 16847293

The association between quality of care and the intensity of diabetes disease management programs.

Carol M Mangione1, Robert B Gerzoff, David F Williamson, W Neil Steers, Eve A Kerr, Arleen F Brown, Beth E Waitzfelder, David G Marrero, R Adams Dudley, Catherine Kim, William Herman, Theodore J Thompson, Monika M Safford, Joe V Selby.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although disease management programs are widely implemented, little is known about their effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether disease management by physician groups is associated with diabetes care processes, control of intermediate outcomes, or the amount of medication used when intermediate outcomes are above target levels.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Patients were randomly sampled from 63 physician groups nested in 7 health plans sponsored by Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (87%) and from 4 health plans with individual physician contracts (13%). PATIENTS: 8661 adults with diabetes who completed a survey (2000-2001) and had medical record data. MEASUREMENTS: Physician group and health plan directors described their organizations' use of physician reminders, performance feedback, and structured care management on a survey; their responses were used to determine measures of intensity of disease management. The current study measured 8 processes of care, including most recent hemoglobin A1c level, systolic blood pressure, serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, and several measures of medication use.
RESULTS: Increased use of any of 3 disease management strategies was significantly associated with higher adjusted rates of retinal screening, nephropathy screening, foot examinations, and measurement of hemoglobin A1c levels. Serum lipid level testing and influenza vaccine administration were associated with greater use of structured care management and performance feedback. Greater use of performance feedback correlated with an increased rate of foot examinations (difference, 5 percentage points [95% CI, 1 to 8 percentage points]), and greater use of physician reminders was associated with an increased rate of nephropathy screening (difference, 15 percentage points [CI, 6 to 23 percentage points]). No strategies were associated with intermediate outcome levels or level of medication management. LIMITATIONS: Physician groups were not randomly sampled from population-based listings, and disease management strategies were not randomly allocated across groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Disease management strategies were associated with better processes of diabetes care but not with improved intermediate outcomes or level of medication management. A greater focus on direct measurement, feedback, and reporting of intermediate outcome levels or of level of medication management may enhance the effectiveness of these programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16847293     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-2-200607180-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  62 in total

Review 1.  Provider and systems factors in diabetes quality of care.

Authors:  Kimia Ghaznavi; Shaista Malik
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Chronic care improvement in primary care: evaluation of an integrated pay-for-performance and practice-based care coordination program among elderly patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Peter J Fagan; Alyson B Schuster; Cynthia Boyd; Jill A Marsteller; Michael Griswold; Shannon M E Murphy; Linda Dunbar; Christopher B Forrest
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The role of peer support in diabetes care and self-management.

Authors:  Carol A Brownson; Michele Heisler
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Clinical quality performance in U.S. health centers.

Authors:  Leiyu Shi; Lydie A Lebrun; Jinsheng Zhu; Arthur S Hayashi; Ravi Sharma; Charles A Daly; Alek Sripipatana; Quyen Ngo-Metzger
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Clinical outcomes of diabetic patients at a student-run free clinic project.

Authors:  Sunny D Smith; Laura Marrone; Alex Gomez; Michelle L Johnson; Steven D Edland; Ellen Beck
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Patient-reported use of collaborative goal setting and glycemic control among patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Jennifer Elston Lafata; Heather L Morris; Elizabeth Dobie; Michele Heisler; Rachel M Werner; Levent Dumenci
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-02-19

7.  Physician perception of reimbursement for outpatient procedures among managed care patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Catherine Kim; Edward F Tierney; William H Herman; Carol M Mangione; K M Venkat Narayan; Robert B Gerzoff; Dori Bilik; Susan L Ettner
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 8.  Pay for performance: will dentistry follow?

Authors:  Andreea Voinea-Griffin; Jeffrey L Fellows; Donald B Rindal; Andrei Barasch; Gregg H Gilbert; Monika M Safford
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Determinants of quality in diabetes care process: The population-based Torino Study.

Authors:  Roberto Gnavi; Roberta Picariello; Ludmi la Karaghiosoff; Giuseppe Costa; Carlo Giorda
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 17.152

10.  Structured chronic primary care and health-related quality of life in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Marije Bosch; Trudy van der Weijden; Richard Grol; Henk Schers; Reinier Akkermans; Louis Niessen; Michel Wensing
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.