BACKGROUND: Statin therapy effectively prevents vascular disease, but treatment targets are often not achieved. PURPOSE: To compare the benefits and harms of high-dose statin monotherapy with those of combination therapy in adults at high risk for coronary disease. DATA SOURCES: English-language records from MEDLINE (1966 to 2009), EMBASE (1980 to 2009), and the Cochrane Library (third quarter of 2008). STUDY SELECTION: A reviewer screened records, and a second reviewer verified selection of randomized, controlled trials in adult patients that compared combinations of statins and bile-acid sequestrants, fibrates, ezetimibe, niacin, or omega-3 fatty acids with statin monotherapy, as well as nonrandomized comparative studies that were longer than 24 weeks and reported clinical and harms outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were abstracted for studies by using standardized forms, and study quality was rated with a standardized scale and strength of evidence by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. DATA SYNTHESIS: 102 studies met eligibility criteria. The main analysis compared combination therapy with high-dose statin monotherapy in high-risk patients. Very-low-strength evidence showed that statin-ezetimibe (2 trials; n = 439) and statin-fibrate (1 trial; n = 166) combinations did not reduce mortality more than high-dose statin monotherapy. No trials compared the effect of combination therapy versus high-dose statin monotherapy on the incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, or revascularization procedures. Two statin-ezetimibe trials (n = 295) demonstrated higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment with combination therapy (odds ratio, 7.21 [95% CI, 4.30 to 12.08]). Trials in lower-risk patients did not show a difference in mortality. LIMITATIONS: Studies were generally short, focused on surrogate outcomes, and were heterogeneous in the sample's risk for coronary disease. Few studies examined treatment combinations other than statin-ezetimibe. CONCLUSION: Limited evidence suggests that combinations of lipid-lowering agents do not improve clinical outcomes more than high-dose statin monotherapy. Very-low-quality evidence favors statin-ezetimibe treatment for attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
BACKGROUND: Statin therapy effectively prevents vascular disease, but treatment targets are often not achieved. PURPOSE: To compare the benefits and harms of high-dose statin monotherapy with those of combination therapy in adults at high risk for coronary disease. DATA SOURCES: English-language records from MEDLINE (1966 to 2009), EMBASE (1980 to 2009), and the Cochrane Library (third quarter of 2008). STUDY SELECTION: A reviewer screened records, and a second reviewer verified selection of randomized, controlled trials in adult patients that compared combinations of statins and bile-acid sequestrants, fibrates, ezetimibe, niacin, or omega-3 fatty acids with statin monotherapy, as well as nonrandomized comparative studies that were longer than 24 weeks and reported clinical and harms outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were abstracted for studies by using standardized forms, and study quality was rated with a standardized scale and strength of evidence by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. DATA SYNTHESIS: 102 studies met eligibility criteria. The main analysis compared combination therapy with high-dose statin monotherapy in high-risk patients. Very-low-strength evidence showed that statin-ezetimibe (2 trials; n = 439) and statin-fibrate (1 trial; n = 166) combinations did not reduce mortality more than high-dose statin monotherapy. No trials compared the effect of combination therapy versus high-dose statin monotherapy on the incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, or revascularization procedures. Two statin-ezetimibe trials (n = 295) demonstrated higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment with combination therapy (odds ratio, 7.21 [95% CI, 4.30 to 12.08]). Trials in lower-risk patients did not show a difference in mortality. LIMITATIONS: Studies were generally short, focused on surrogate outcomes, and were heterogeneous in the sample's risk for coronary disease. Few studies examined treatment combinations other than statin-ezetimibe. CONCLUSION: Limited evidence suggests that combinations of lipid-lowering agents do not improve clinical outcomes more than high-dose statin monotherapy. Very-low-quality evidence favors statin-ezetimibe treatment for attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Authors: Lars Berglund; John D Brunzell; Anne C Goldberg; Ira J Goldberg; Anton Stalenhoef Journal: Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-10-17 Impact factor: 4.690
Authors: Barbara Nußbaumer; Anna Glechner; Angela Kaminski-Hartenthaler; Peter Mahlknecht; Gerald Gartlehner Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Mary Reed; Jie Huang; Ilana Graetz; Richard Brand; John Hsu; Bruce Fireman; Marc Jaffe Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Ashley J Beard; Timothy P Hofer; John R Downs; Michelle Lucatorto; Mandi L Klamerus; Rob Holleman; Eve A Kerr Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2012-12-11
Authors: Lars Berglund; John D Brunzell; Anne C Goldberg; Ira J Goldberg; Frank Sacks; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Anton F H Stalenhoef Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 5.958