Literature DB >> 23026253

Differences in measurement of lower limb alignment among different registration methods of navigation and radiographs in TKA using the OrthoPilot system.

Seung-Suk Seo1, Jin-Hyeok Seo, Myung-Whan Sohn, Yoon-Jun Kim.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were (1) to compare lower limb alignment measurements between radiographs and computer-assisted surgery and (2) to evaluate the discrepancy in lower limb alignment between computer-assisted surgery with a high tibial osteotomy protocol and computer-assisted surgery with a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) protocol in the same knee. Seventy-one TKAs were performed on patients with primary osteoarthritis using computer-assisted surgery. Preoperative lower limb alignment was measured using the mechanical axis during bipedal, weight-bearing, whole-leg anteroposterior radiography (measure 1). The intraoperative mechanical axis was measured with computer-assisted surgery according to the high tibial osteotomy protocol before joint exposure (measure 2). After changing the software and joint exposure, the intraoperative mechanical axis was measured with computer-assisted surgery according to TKA protocol (measure 3). After final TKA implantation, the lower limb mechanical axis was measured with computer-assisted surgery following the TKA protocol (measure 4). Postoperative lower limb alignment was measured using the mechanical axis on whole-leg standing anteroposterior radiographs (measure 5). The mechanical axis and median value from each group were compared. Factors affecting the mechanical axis measurement were also analyzed. The difference in the mechanical axis between measures 1 and 2, measures 1 and 3, and measures 2 and 3 was significant (P<.0001, <.0001, and =.0007, respectively). The difference between measures 4 and 5 was also significant (P<.0001). Factors affecting the mechanical axis measurement, such as age, height, weight, and range of motion, showed no correlation (R(2)=.07244 and adjusted R(2)=.01622). The pre- and postoperative radiological measurements of limb alignment using the mechanical axis were different from the intraoperative measurements with navigation. Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23026253     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120919-58

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  5 in total

1.  Effect of foot rotation on the mechanical axis and correlation between knee and whole leg radiographs.

Authors:  Yong Seuk Lee; Beom Koo Lee; Seung Hoon Lee; Hong Gi Park; Deuk-Soo Jun; Do Hyun Moon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Intra- and post-operative accuracy assessments of two different patient-specific instrumentation systems for total knee replacement.

Authors:  Andrea Ensini; Antonio Timoncini; Francesco Cenni; Claudio Belvedere; Francesca Fusai; Alberto Leardini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Do CAS measurements correlate with EOS 3D alignment measurements in primary TKA?

Authors:  Marrigje F Meijer; Alexander L Boerboom; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Inge H F Reininga; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Measurement of lower limb alignment: there are within-person differences between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing measurement modalities.

Authors:  Daphne A L Schoenmakers; Peter Z Feczko; Bert Boonen; Martijn G M Schotanus; Nanne P Kort; Pieter J Emans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Difference between Mechanical Alignment in Navigation and Scanogram during Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rohan Bhimani; Fardeen Bhimani; Preeti Singh
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2019-04-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.