Literature DB >> 2301880

Evaluation of porous polyethylene for external ear reconstruction.

A Shanbhag1, H I Friedman, J Augustine, A F von Recum.   

Abstract

Autogenous rib cartilage and silicone rubber are materials currently used for ear reconstruction. Increased morbidity and operative time with rib cartilage grafts and a high rate of extrusion with silicone implants render them less than ideal for reconstruction of the human ear. The purpose of the current investigation is to determine the efficacy of porous polyethylene as an alternative synthetic material for ear reconstruction. Porous polyethylene and silicone rubber discs of equal sizes in two thicknesses were implanted in lieu of the cartilage in the external ear of eight baboons. Histological evaluation of the sites after nine weeks revealed excellent anchorage of the thin porous polyethylene implants (1.5 mm) in the surrounding tissues. Silicone rubber implants, however, were encapsulated in a thickened granulation tissue capsule. When thicker implants (3.0 mm) were used, exposure or extrusion occurred in all cases. Porous polyethylene implants demonstrated only partial exposure; half of the silicone rubber implants were extruded; and the other two silicone rubber implants were almost completely extruded. Porous polyethylene was thus better incorporated into the soft tissues than silicone rubber as long as the overlying soft tissues were not stressed by an oversized implant or inadequate soft tissue coverage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2301880     DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199001000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  10 in total

1.  Clinical experience with the Medpor porous polyethylene implant.

Authors:  T Wellisz
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Auricular reconstruction of congenital microtia using autogenous costal cartilage: report of 27 cases.

Authors:  Dinesh Singh Chauhan; Yadavalli Guruprasad
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-10-15

3.  Preformation of microvascular composite free flaps in the rat as an animal model.

Authors:  H Steinhart; H G Schroeder; O Kleinsasser
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Auricular reconstruction from rib to 3D printing.

Authors:  Chelsea L Reighard; Scott J Hollister; David A Zopf
Journal:  J 3D Print Med       Date:  2017-12-15

5.  Medpor in maxillofacial deformities: report of three cases.

Authors:  N N Andrade; Kanchan Raikwar
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2009-08-11

6.  Utility of high density porous polyethylene implants in maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Anshul Rai; Abhay Datarkar; Aakash Arora; D G Adwani
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-01-01

7.  Porous high-density polyethylene in facial reconstruction and revision rhinoplasty: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shabahang Mohammadi; Shadi Ghourchian; Farzad Izadi; Ahmad Daneshi; Aslan Ahmadi
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  3D-printed high-density polyethylene scaffolds with bioactive and antibacterial layer-by-layer modification for auricle reconstruction.

Authors:  Junfeiyang Yin; Jing Zhong; Jiejie Wang; Yilin Wang; Ting Li; Ling Wang; Yang Yang; Zhifang Zhen; Yanbing Li; Hongwu Zhang; Shizhen Zhong; Yaobin Wu; Wenhua Huang
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 9.  The use of adipose stem cells in cranial facial surgery.

Authors:  Michelle Griffin; Deepak M Kalaskar; Peter E Butler; Alexander M Seifalian
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.739

10.  Maxillofacial reconstruction with Medpor porous polyethylene implant: a case series study.

Authors:  Mansour Khorasani; Pejman Janbaz; Farshid Rayati
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-06-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.