Literature DB >> 23017528

Trends in the use of incontinence procedures after radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis.

Philip H Kim1, Laura C Pinheiro, Coral L Atoria, James A Eastham, Jaspreet S Sandhu, Elena B Elkin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Urinary incontinence is a frequent complication of radical prostatectomy with a detrimental impact on quality of life. We identified predictors and trends in the use of procedures for post-prostatectomy incontinence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) cancer registry data linked with Medicare claims, we identified men 66 years old or older who were treated with radical prostatectomy in 2000 to 2007. The primary outcome was performance of an incontinence procedure. Demographic and clinical predictors of incontinence surgery were evaluated by multivariable regression analysis.
RESULTS: Of 16,348 men treated with radical prostatectomy 1,057 (6%) had undergone at least 1 incontinence procedure by a median of 20 months after the procedure, including 61% who underwent the first incontinence procedure within 2 years of prostatectomy. Older age and residence in the South were associated with greater probability of an incontinence procedure. Black men and those living in nonmetropolitan areas were less likely than their peers to undergo an incontinence procedure. Of men treated with any incontinence procedure 15% underwent more than 1 type. Of those treated with bulking agents 39% also received a urethral sling or artificial urinary sphincter and 13% who received a sling also had an artificial urinary sphincter. In 34% of the men who underwent any incontinence surgery artificial urinary sphincter placement was the only procedure performed.
CONCLUSIONS: In this population based cohort of older men with prostate cancer only 6% underwent an incontinence procedure after prostatectomy. This low rate may reflect the underuse of potentially beneficial procedures.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23017528     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  27 in total

1.  Management of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Thomas R Jarvis; Jaspreet S Sandhu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  [Incontinence after radical prostatectomy : Male Sling or "best option" first?]

Authors:  J F Gerhard; M S Aragona; R Olianas
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.

Authors:  Amjad Alwaal; Catherine R Harris; Mohannad A Awad; Isabel E Allen; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  The impact of prior urethral sling on artificial urinary sphincter outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew J Ziegelmann; Brian J Linder; Marcelino E Rivera; Boyd R Viers; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Patient reported functional outcomes following robotic-assisted (RARP), laparoscopic (LRP), and open radical prostatectomies (ORP).

Authors:  G J Nason; F O'Kelly; S White; E Dunne; G P Smyth; R E Power
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 6.  Surgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient?

Authors:  Craig Comiter
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Impact of previous urethroplasty on the outcome after artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Khalid Sayedahmed; Roberto Olianas; Bjoern Kaftan; Mohamed Omar; Mohamed El Shazly; Maximilian Burger; Roman Mayr; Bernd Rosenhammer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  A Systematic Approach to the Evaluation and Management of the Failed Artificial Urinary Sphincter.

Authors:  Amy D Dobberfuhl; Craig V Comiter
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Risk factors for erosion of artificial urinary sphincters: a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  William O Brant; Bradley A Erickson; Sean P Elliott; Christopher Powell; Nejd Alsikafi; Christopher McClung; Jeremy B Myers; Bryan B Voelzke; Thomas G Smith; Joshua A Broghammer
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 10.  Considering the role of radical prostatectomy in 21st century prostate cancer care.

Authors:  Anthony J Costello
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.