Literature DB >> 25558839

Surgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient?

Craig Comiter1.   

Abstract

Surgery remains the most effective treatment for postprostatectomy incontinence. Over the past two decades, this surgery has evolved with respect to both operative technique and sling design, and various devices are now available that have different mechanisms of action, such as the artificial urinary sphincter, retroluminal sling or quadratic sling. The choice of device, however, should be individualized according to the circumstances of each patient. The optimal surgical treatment depends on a variety of patient-related factors, including the degree of urine leakage as assessed by incontinence pad weight test results, bladder contractility, urethral compliance, history of radiation exposure or prior incontinence surgery, and patient preference--given the choice, most patients opt for a sling procedure over an artificial sphincter to avoid implantation of a mechanical device. Athorough urodynamic evaluation is, therefore, necessary for the majority of patients. An artificial urinary sphincter, retroluminal sling or quadratic sling might be the most appropriate choice for a particular patient, depending on their specific urodynamic findings. Progress in this field continues, and several new devices are in development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25558839     DOI: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  74 in total

1.  Retrograde perfusion sphincterometry with a flexible cystoscope: method of troubleshooting the AMS 800.

Authors:  J M Choe; B S Battino; T E Bell
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Long-term efficacy of the bone-anchored male sling for moderate and severe stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Maude Carmel; Bechir Hage; Samer Hanna; Gerard Schmutz; Le Mai Tu
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Mid-term results for the retroluminar transobturator sling suspension for stress urinary incontinence after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ricarda M Bauer; Irina Soljanik; Claudius Füllhase; Alexander Karl; Armin Becker; Christian G Stief; Christian Gozzi
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  The male perineal sling: assessment and prediction of outcome.

Authors:  Melissa C Fischer; Chad Huckabay; Victor W Nitti
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Repeat retrourethral transobturator sling in the management of recurrent postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence after failed first male sling.

Authors:  Irina Soljanik; Armin J Becker; Christian G Stief; Christian Gozzi; Ricarda M Bauer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  The impact of an antibiotic coating on the artificial urinary sphincter infection rate.

Authors:  Mitra R de Cógáin; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  The model AS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: Mayo Clinic experience.

Authors:  B Goldwasser; W L Furlow; D M Barrett
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  AdVance/AdVance XP transobturator male slings: preoperative degree of incontinence as predictor of surgical outcome.

Authors:  Argimiro Collado Serra; Luís Resel Folkersma; José L Domínguez-Escrig; Alvaro Gómez-Ferrer; José Rubio-Briones; Eduardo Solsona Narbón
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  A prospective study evaluating the efficacy of the artificial sphincter AMS 800 for the treatment of postradical prostatectomy urinary incontinence and the correlation between preoperative urodynamic and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Flavio Trigo Rocha; Cristiano Mendes Gomes; Anuar Ibrahim Mitre; Sami Arap; Miguel Srougi
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Continuous occlusion test to determine detrusor contractile performance.

Authors:  M P Sullivan; C E DuBeau; N M Resnick; E G Cravalho; S V Yalla
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  7 in total

1.  Are we underestimating the rates of incontinence after prostate cancer treatment? Results from NHANES.

Authors:  Michael Daugherty; Raju Chelluri; Gennady Bratslavsky; Timothy Byler
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  A Systematic Approach to the Evaluation and Management of the Failed Artificial Urinary Sphincter.

Authors:  Amy D Dobberfuhl; Craig V Comiter
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Is pre-operative urodynamic bladder function the true predictor of outcome of male sling for post prostatectomy incontinence?

Authors:  Bogdan Toia; Lap Yan Leung; Raveen Saigal; Eskinder Solomon; Sachin Malde; Claire Taylor; Arun Sahai; Rizwan Hamid; Jai H Seth; Davendra Sharma; Tamsin J Greenwell; Jeremy L Ockrim
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  The artificial urinary sphincter and male sling for postprostatectomy incontinence: Which patient should get which procedure?

Authors:  Craig V Comiter; Amy D Dobberfuhl
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-01-11

5.  Telephone - delivered quality of life after 365 male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) operations.

Authors:  Katharina Maria Bretterbauer; Erik Randall Huber; Mesut Remzi; Wilhelm Huebner
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 6.  Recent research on the role of urodynamic study in the diagnosis and treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Yuan-Hong Jiang; Hann-Chorng Kuo
Journal:  Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

Review 7.  Artificial urinary sphincters for male stress urinary incontinence: current perspectives.

Authors:  Billy H Cordon; Nirmish Singla; Ajay K Singla
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-07-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.