Literature DB >> 23017508

Readability assessment of online urology patient education materials.

Marc Colaco1, Peter F Svider, Nitin Agarwal, Jean Anderson Eloy, Imani M Jackson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The National Institutes of Health, American Medical Association, and United States Department of Health and Human Services recommend that patient education materials be written at a fourth to sixth grade reading level to facilitate comprehension. We examined and compared the readability and difficulty of online patient education materials from the American Urological Association and academic urology departments in the Northeastern United States.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed the online patient education materials for difficulty level with 10 commonly used readability assessment tools, including the Flesch Reading Ease Score, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook, New Dale-Chall Test, Coleman-Liau index, New Fog Count, Raygor Readability Estimate, FORCAST test and Fry score.
RESULTS: Most patient education materials on the websites of these programs were written at or above the eleventh grade reading level.
CONCLUSIONS: Urological online patient education materials are written above the recommended reading level. They may need to be simplified to facilitate better patient understanding of urological topics.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23017508     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  22 in total

1.  Websites on Bladder Cancer: an Appropriate Source of Patient Information?

Authors:  Johannes Salem; Pia Paffenholz; Christian Bolenz; Melanie von Brandenstein; Angelika Cebulla; Axel Haferkamp; Timur Kuru; Cheryl T Lee; David Pfister; Igor Tsaur; Hendrik Borgmann; Axel Heidenreich
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Online nutrition information for pregnant women: a content analysis.

Authors:  Tayla Storr; Judith Maher; Elizabeth Swanepoel
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Are we effectively informing patients? A quantitative analysis of on-line patient education resources from the American Society of Neuroradiology.

Authors:  D R Hansberry; N Agarwal; S F Gonzales; S R Baker
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Readability of American online patient education materials in urologic oncology: a need for simple communication.

Authors:  Amanda Pruthi; Matthew E Nielsen; Mathew C Raynor; Michael E Woods; Eric M Wallen; Angela B Smith
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Assessment of readability, quality and popularity of online information on ureteral stents.

Authors:  Sarah Mozafarpour; Briony Norris; James Borin; Brian H Eisner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Readability assessment of online patient education materials provided by the European Association of Urology.

Authors:  Patrick Betschart; Valentin Zumstein; Maico Bentivoglio; Daniel Engeler; Hans-Peter Schmid; Dominik Abt
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Colorectal cancer screening patient education materials-how effective is online health information?

Authors:  Elizabeth Sheena John; Ann M John; David R Hansberry; Prashant J Thomas; Prateek Agarwal; Christopher Deitch; Sita Chokhavatia
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Readability, credibility and quality of patient information for hypogonadism and testosterone replacement therapy on the Internet.

Authors:  J A McBride; C C Carson; R M Coward
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.896

9.  Online patient information from radiation oncology departments is too complex for the general population.

Authors:  Stephen A Rosenberg; David M Francis; Craig R Hullet; Zachary S Morris; Jeffrey V Brower; Bethany M Anderson; Kristin A Bradley; Michael F Bassetti; Randall J Kimple
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-08-01

10.  Readability of Online Patient Educational Resources Found on NCI-Designated Cancer Center Web Sites.

Authors:  Stephen A Rosenberg; David Francis; Craig R Hullett; Zachary S Morris; Michael M Fisher; Jeffrey V Brower; Kristin A Bradley; Bethany M Anderson; Michael F Bassetti; Randall J Kimple
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 11.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.