OBJECTIVE: Anatomical reduction of two- to four-part fractures of the proximal humerus using indirect reduction techniques. Intramedullary fixation with a short humerus nail. Restoration of a stable bone-implant construct that enables early functional after-treatment. INDICATIONS: Displaced and unstable two- to four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Fractures of the proximal humerus extending in the humeral diaphysis (use a long nail). Ipsilateral combined lesions of the proximal humerus and the humeral diaphysis (use a long nail). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Poor physical and/or mental status. Critical soft tissue conditions in the area near the surgical site. Local soft tissue infection. Pre-existing severe osteoarthritis of the shoulder joint; severe shoulder stiffness. Head-split fractures of the humerus head that cannot be reduced. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Exposure of the fracture using an anterior acromial approach and determination of the correct nail entrance point. Anatomic fracture reduction using indirect reduction techniques. Stable fixation using an intramedullary MultiLoc® nail. Determination of the proximal locking configuration depending on the fracture morphology. Distal locking with angle-stable option. POST-OPERATIVE TREATMENT: Post-operative radiographs for documentation of the surgical result and implant position. Use of an arm sling for 7-10 days. Active and passive exercises of the shoulder joint starting on day 1. Shoulder abduction limited to 60° for 2 weeks. Subsequent abduction to 90° until the 4th week. Subsequent active mobilisation without restrictions. Weight bearing and sporting activities after 3 months. Radiological evaluation after 2, 6 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: During a 6-month period, 160 patients were documented in a prospective clinical multicentre study. According to the AO classification, there were 36% A-type fractures, 41% B- and 23% C-type injuries. A 6-month follow-up was available for 17 patients. The mean age of these patients was 67 years. One patient had an A-type fracture. There were ten B- and six C-type fractures. At the time of follow-up, the mean Constant score was 66 points. Radiographically, all fractures had healed. Intra-articular screw penetration and loss of reduction were both observed once.
OBJECTIVE: Anatomical reduction of two- to four-part fractures of the proximal humerus using indirect reduction techniques. Intramedullary fixation with a short humerus nail. Restoration of a stable bone-implant construct that enables early functional after-treatment. INDICATIONS: Displaced and unstable two- to four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Fractures of the proximal humerus extending in the humeral diaphysis (use a long nail). Ipsilateral combined lesions of the proximal humerus and the humeral diaphysis (use a long nail). CONTRAINDICATIONS: Poor physical and/or mental status. Critical soft tissue conditions in the area near the surgical site. Local soft tissue infection. Pre-existing severe osteoarthritis of the shoulder joint; severe shoulder stiffness. Head-split fractures of the humerus head that cannot be reduced. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Exposure of the fracture using an anterior acromial approach and determination of the correct nail entrance point. Anatomic fracture reduction using indirect reduction techniques. Stable fixation using an intramedullary MultiLoc® nail. Determination of the proximal locking configuration depending on the fracture morphology. Distal locking with angle-stable option. POST-OPERATIVE TREATMENT: Post-operative radiographs for documentation of the surgical result and implant position. Use of an arm sling for 7-10 days. Active and passive exercises of the shoulder joint starting on day 1. Shoulder abduction limited to 60° for 2 weeks. Subsequent abduction to 90° until the 4th week. Subsequent active mobilisation without restrictions. Weight bearing and sporting activities after 3 months. Radiological evaluation after 2, 6 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: During a 6-month period, 160 patients were documented in a prospective clinical multicentre study. According to the AO classification, there were 36% A-type fractures, 41% B- and 23% C-type injuries. A 6-month follow-up was available for 17 patients. The mean age of these patients was 67 years. One patient had an A-type fracture. There were ten B- and six C-type fractures. At the time of follow-up, the mean Constant score was 66 points. Radiographically, all fractures had healed. Intra-articular screw penetration and loss of reduction were both observed once.
Authors: Martin Henri Hessmann; Werner Sternstein Matthias Hansen; Frank Krummenauer; Tamara Fischer Pol; Pol Maria Rommens Journal: J Trauma Date: 2005-06
Authors: Philip Gierer; Martin Scholz; Markus Beck; Klaus D Schaser; Brigitte Vollmar; Thomas Mittlmeier; Georg Gradl Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2009-08-13 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: Pierre Hepp; Helmut Lill; Hermann Bail; Jan Korner; Manuel Niederhagen; Norbert P Haas; Christoph Josten; Georg N Duda Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Simon A Euler; Maximilian Petri; Melanie B Venderley; Grant J Dornan; Werner Schmoelz; Travis Lee Turnbull; Michael Plecko; Franz S Kralinger; Peter J Millett Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Isabelle Benoit; Miaomiao Zhou; Alexandra Vivas Duarte; Damien J Downes; Richard B Todd; Wendy Kloezen; Harm Post; Albert J R Heck; A F Maarten Altelaar; Ronald P de Vries Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-08-28 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Y P Acklin; I Zderic; J A Inzana; S Grechenig; R Schwyn; R G Richards; B Gueorguiev Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2018-07-07 Impact factor: 5.853