T FitzGibbon1, S F Taylor. 1. Department of Clinical Ophthalmology, School of Medical Sciences and Bosch Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. thomas.fitzgibbon@gmail.com
Abstract
PURPOSE: We examined retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axon diameters within the human retinal nerve fibre layer in order to provide information about the possible effects of axonal stimulation when a retinal prosthesis includes the nonfoveal regions. METHODS: Five pairs of eyes were obtained from donors aged from 48 to 84 years. Fixation delay ranged from 5 to 22 h. Tissue was processed for electron microscopy. RESULTS: Inferior and/or nasal RGC axons were on average larger than superior and/or temporal axons. The inferior retina contained some very large axons. Foveal axons were on average smaller than nonfoveal axons and had a size distribution that suggested different size groupings not seen in other samples. Peripheral versus central axons within the superior and inferior nasal retinal samples were compared; peripheral axons were significantly larger, unlike the inferior temporal samples or the samples nasal to the optic disc. CONCLUSIONS: Stimulus-current thresholds will change as a retinal prosthesis increases in size and encroaches on the nonfoveal axons. These changes can be anticipated based on mean axon diameter. Knowing in advance the possible outcome of electrical stimulation of the axonal population may help refine prosthetic procedures and patient training.
PURPOSE: We examined retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axon diameters within the human retinal nerve fibre layer in order to provide information about the possible effects of axonal stimulation when a retinal prosthesis includes the nonfoveal regions. METHODS: Five pairs of eyes were obtained from donors aged from 48 to 84 years. Fixation delay ranged from 5 to 22 h. Tissue was processed for electron microscopy. RESULTS: Inferior and/or nasal RGC axons were on average larger than superior and/or temporal axons. The inferior retina contained some very large axons. Foveal axons were on average smaller than nonfoveal axons and had a size distribution that suggested different size groupings not seen in other samples. Peripheral versus central axons within the superior and inferior nasal retinal samples were compared; peripheral axons were significantly larger, unlike the inferior temporal samples or the samples nasal to the optic disc. CONCLUSIONS: Stimulus-current thresholds will change as a retinal prosthesis increases in size and encroaches on the nonfoveal axons. These changes can be anticipated based on mean axon diameter. Knowing in advance the possible outcome of electrical stimulation of the axonal population may help refine prosthetic procedures and patient training.
Authors: Gang Huang; Ting Luo; Thomas J Gast; Stephen A Burns; Victor E Malinovsky; William H Swanson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ravi S Jonnal; Omer P Kocaoglu; Robert J Zawadzki; Zhuolin Liu; Donald T Miller; John S Werner Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Timothy B Esler; Robert R Kerr; Bahman Tahayori; David B Grayden; Hamish Meffin; Anthony N Burkitt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 3.240