Literature DB >> 17409473

Prosthetic interfaces with the visual system: biological issues.

Ethan D Cohen1.   

Abstract

The design of effective visual prostheses for the blind represents a challenge for biomedical engineers and neuroscientists. Significant progress has been made in the miniaturization and processing power of prosthesis electronics; however development lags in the design and construction of effective machine-brain interfaces with visual system neurons. This review summarizes what has been learned about stimulating neurons in the human and primate retina, lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex. Each level of the visual system presents unique challenges for neural interface design. Blind patients with the retinal degenerative disease retinitis pigmentosa (RP) are a common population in clinical trials of visual prostheses. The visual performance abilities of normals and RP patients are compared. To generate pattern vision in blind patients, the visual prosthetic interface must effectively stimulate the retinotopically organized neurons in the central visual field to elicit patterned visual percepts. The development of more biologically compatible methods of stimulating visual system neurons is critical to the development of finer spatial percepts. Prosthesis electrode arrays need to adapt to different optimal stimulus locations, stimulus patterns, and patient disease states.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17409473     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/4/2/R02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  18 in total

1.  Visual prosthesis.

Authors:  Peter H Schiller; Edward J Tehovnik
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  [Development of a minimally invasive retinal implant system].

Authors:  H Gerding
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Lateral geniculate body evoked potentials elicited by visual and electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Chang Wook Choi; Pan Sang Kim; Sun Ae Shin; Ji Yeon Yang; Yun Sik Yang
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-22

4.  Titania nanotube arrays as interfaces for neural prostheses.

Authors:  Jonathan A Sorkin; Stephen Hughes; Paulo Soares; Ketul C Popat
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 7.328

5.  Virtual active touch using randomly patterned intracortical microstimulation.

Authors:  Joseph E O'Doherty; Mikhail A Lebedev; Zheng Li; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 6.  Building the bionic eye: an emerging reality and opportunity.

Authors:  Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

7.  Mean retinal ganglion cell axon diameter varies with location in the human retina.

Authors:  T FitzGibbon; S F Taylor
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Neuronal loss due to prolonged controlled-current stimulation with chronically implanted microelectrodes in the cat cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Douglas McCreery; Victor Pikov; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 9.  Neural interface technology for rehabilitation: exploiting and promoting neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jennifer L Collinger; Monica A Perez; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara; Leonardo G Cohen; Niels Birbaumer; Steven W Brose; Andrew B Schwartz; Michael L Boninger; Douglas J Weber
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.784

10.  Strength-duration relationship for intra- versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes.

Authors:  F Rattay; L P Paredes; R N Leao
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.