Literature DB >> 23010857

Multi-GPU Jacobian accelerated computing for soft-field tomography.

A Borsic1, E A Attardo, R J Halter.   

Abstract

Image reconstruction in soft-field tomography is based on an inverse problem formulation, where a forward model is fitted to the data. In medical applications, where the anatomy presents complex shapes, it is common to use finite element models (FEMs) to represent the volume of interest and solve a partial differential equation that models the physics of the system. Over the last decade, there has been a shifting interest from 2D modeling to 3D modeling, as the underlying physics of most problems are 3D. Although the increased computational power of modern computers allows working with much larger FEM models, the computational time required to reconstruct 3D images on a fine 3D FEM model can be significant, on the order of hours. For example, in electrical impedance tomography (EIT) applications using a dense 3D FEM mesh with half a million elements, a single reconstruction iteration takes approximately 15-20 min with optimized routines running on a modern multi-core PC. It is desirable to accelerate image reconstruction to enable researchers to more easily and rapidly explore data and reconstruction parameters. Furthermore, providing high-speed reconstructions is essential for some promising clinical application of EIT. For 3D problems, 70% of the computing time is spent building the Jacobian matrix, and 25% of the time in forward solving. In this work, we focus on accelerating the Jacobian computation by using single and multiple GPUs. First, we discuss an optimized implementation on a modern multi-core PC architecture and show how computing time is bounded by the CPU-to-memory bandwidth; this factor limits the rate at which data can be fetched by the CPU. Gains associated with the use of multiple CPU cores are minimal, since data operands cannot be fetched fast enough to saturate the processing power of even a single CPU core. GPUs have much faster memory bandwidths compared to CPUs and better parallelism. We are able to obtain acceleration factors of 20 times on a single NVIDIA S1070 GPU, and of 50 times on four GPUs, bringing the Jacobian computing time for a fine 3D mesh from 12 min to 14 s. We regard this as an important step toward gaining interactive reconstruction times in 3D imaging, particularly when coupled in the future with acceleration of the forward problem. While we demonstrate results for EIT, these results apply to any soft-field imaging modality where the Jacobian matrix is computed with the adjoint method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23010857      PMCID: PMC3498618          DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/33/10/1703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  12 in total

1.  Addressing the computational cost of large EIT solutions.

Authors:  Alistair Boyle; Andrea Borsic; Andy Adler
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.833

2.  GPU-based fast cone beam CT reconstruction from undersampled and noisy projection data via total variation.

Authors:  Xun Jia; Yifei Lou; Ruijiang Li; William Y Song; Steve B Jiang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Photon-measurement density functions. Part 2: Finite-element-method calculations.

Authors:  S R Arridge; M Schweiger
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 1.980

4.  Gauss-Newton method for image reconstruction in diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Martin Schweiger; Simon R Arridge; Ilkka Nissilä
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 5.  GPU computing in medical physics: a review.

Authors:  Guillem Pratx; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Optical breast shape capture and finite-element mesh generation for electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  J Forsyth; A Borsic; R J Halter; A Hartov; K D Paulsen
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 2.833

7.  Monte Carlo simulation of photon migration in 3D turbid media accelerated by graphics processing units.

Authors:  Qianqian Fang; David A Boas
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  A real-time electrical impedance tomography system for clinical use--design and preliminary results.

Authors:  R W Smith; I L Freeston; B H Brown
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  A method for generating patient-specific finite element meshes for head modelling.

Authors:  A P Gibson; J Riley; M Schweiger; J C Hebden; S R Arridge; D T Delpy
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  GPU-Accelerated Finite Element Method for Modelling Light Transport in Diffuse Optical Tomography.

Authors:  Martin Schweiger
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2011-10-16
View more
  5 in total

1.  Anatomically accurate hard priors for transrectal electrical impedance tomography (TREIT) of the prostate.

Authors:  H Syed; A Borsic; A Hartov; R J Halter
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 2.833

2.  Toward microendoscopic electrical impedance tomography for intraoperative surgical margin assessment.

Authors:  Ryan J Halter; Young-Joong Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Comparative study of separation between ex vivo prostatic malignant and benign tissue using electrical impedance spectroscopy and electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  Ethan K Murphy; Aditya Mahara; Shadab Khan; Elias S Hyams; Alan R Schned; Jason Pettus; Ryan J Halter
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Sparse image reconstruction of intracerebral hemorrhage with electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  Yanyan Shi; Yuehui Wu; Meng Wang; Zhiwei Tian; Xiaolong Kong; Xiaoyue He
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-01-13

5.  Primal-dual approach to optical tomography with discretized path integral with efficient formulations.

Authors:  Bingzhi Yuan; Toru Tamaki; Bisser Raytchev; Kazufumi Kaneda
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-07-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.