Literature DB >> 23009834

Dynamic organization of transcription compartments is dependent on functional nuclear architecture.

Shovamayee Maharana1, Divya Sharma, Xianke Shi, G V Shivashankar.   

Abstract

Transcription in higher organisms requires spatiotemporal coordination of transcription machinery and the transcription factors at promoter sites. Toward this, recent evidence suggests that both static compartmentalization and dynamic self-organization of transcriptional apparatus are in effect at sites of transcription. Although the dynamics of transcription machinery is essential to genome regulation, the principles underlying this organization and its functional coupling to nuclear architecture is unclear. In a recent study we revealed that Uridine-5'-triphosphate (UTP) uptake in living cells labeled transcription-related compartments. In this article, we quantitatively establish multicolor labeling strategies for UTP-enriched transcription compartments (TCs) and probe their dynamic organization. UTP-enriched TCs were found to be in two distinct fractions: one colocalized with phosphorylated RNA pol II and the other as nascent aggregates. The fraction colocalized with the phosphorylated RNA pol II decreased with the inhibition of transcription initiation or elongation. Fluorescence anisotropy imaging and photobleaching experiments suggest that TCs are functional aggregates of nascent transcripts that are assembled in a transcription-dependent manner. Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy analysis revealed the relative fraction and sizes of fluorescent UTP-labeled transcripts in the nucleoplasm. Time-lapse imaging experiments of TCs exhibited pause and a mobile nature of these compartments within interchromosome territories. Perturbation of either nucleoskeletal protein or the cytoskeleton resulted in reduced active mobility of TCs, whereas inhibitors of transcription enhanced the mobile fraction of TCs. Further, high temporal resolution imaging showed evidence of stepping dynamics of TCs regulated by nucleoskeleton and chromatin modifications. Taken together, our experiments suggest the transient compartmentalization of UTP-enriched aggregates and their dynamic reorganization in a transcription-dependent manner. These results may have important implications for understanding spatiotemporal control of eukaryotic transcription.
Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23009834      PMCID: PMC3433616          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.06.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  34 in total

1.  Structural dynamics of green fluorescent protein alone and fused with a single chain Fv protein.

Authors:  M A Hink; R A Griep; J W Borst; A van Hoek; M H Eppink; A Schots; A J Visser
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-06-09       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Micro-organization and visco-elasticity of the interphase nucleus revealed by particle nanotracking.

Authors:  Yiider Tseng; Jerry S H Lee; Thomas P Kole; Ingjye Jiang; Denis Wirtz
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 3.  Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions.

Authors:  Christian Lanctôt; Thierry Cheutin; Marion Cremer; Giacomo Cavalli; Thomas Cremer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Domain-specific interactions of human HP1-type chromodomain proteins and inner nuclear membrane protein LBR.

Authors:  Q Ye; I Callebaut; A Pezhman; J C Courvalin; H J Worman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-06-06       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Defects in lamin B1 expression or processing affect interphase chromosome position and gene expression.

Authors:  Ashraf Malhas; Chiu Fan Lee; Rebecca Sanders; Nigel J Saunders; David J Vaux
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription.

Authors:  Cameron S Osborne; Lyubomira Chakalova; Karen E Brown; David Carter; Alice Horton; Emmanuel Debrand; Beatriz Goyenechea; Jennifer A Mitchell; Susana Lopes; Wolf Reik; Peter Fraser
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Nuclear domains.

Authors:  D L Spector
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 8.  Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation.

Authors:  Peter Fraser; Wendy Bickmore
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Transcription factories are nuclear subcompartments that remain in the absence of transcription.

Authors:  Jennifer A Mitchell; Peter Fraser
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Tissue-specific spatial organization of genomes.

Authors:  Luis A Parada; Philip G McQueen; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  6 in total

1.  Dynamics of active semiflexible polymers.

Authors:  A Ghosh; N S Gov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  3D Protein Dynamics in the Cell Nucleus.

Authors:  Anand P Singh; Rémi Galland; Megan L Finch-Edmondson; Gianluca Grenci; Jean-Baptiste Sibarita; Vincent Studer; Virgile Viasnoff; Timothy E Saunders
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Heterogeneity of Calcium Channel/cAMP-Dependent Transcriptional Activation.

Authors:  Evgeny Kobrinsky
Journal:  Curr Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.339

4.  WNT signaling and AHCTF1 promote oncogenic MYC expression through super-enhancer-mediated gene gating.

Authors:  Barbara A Scholz; Noriyuki Sumida; Anita Göndör; Rolf Ohlsson; Carolina Diettrich Mallet de Lima; Ilyas Chachoua; Mirco Martino; Ilias Tzelepis; Andrej Nikoshkov; Honglei Zhao; Rashid Mehmood; Emmanouil G Sifakis; Deeksha Bhartiya
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Dynamics of passive and active particles in the cell nucleus.

Authors:  Feroz M Hameed; Madan Rao; G V Shivashankar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reprogramming of fibroblast nuclei in cloned bovine embryos involves major structural remodeling with both striking similarities and differences to nuclear phenotypes of in vitro fertilized embryos.

Authors:  Jens Popken; Alessandro Brero; Daniela Koehler; Volker J Schmid; Axel Strauss; Annegret Wuensch; Tuna Guengoer; Alexander Graf; Stefan Krebs; Helmut Blum; Valeri Zakhartchenko; Eckhard Wolf; Thomas Cremer
Journal:  Nucleus       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.197

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.