| Literature DB >> 23008800 |
S Shawn McCafferty1, Andrew Martin, Eldredge Bermingham.
Abstract
It is well appreciated that historical and ecological processes are important determinates of freshwater biogeographic assemblages. Phylogeography can potentially lend important insights into the relative contribution of historical processes in biogeography. However, the extent that phylogeography reflects historical patterns of drainage connection may depend in large part on the dispersal capability of the species. Here, we test the hypothesis that due to their relatively greater dispersal capabilities, the neotropical cichlid species Andinoacara coeruleopunctatus will display a phylogeographic pattern that differs from previously described biogeographic assemblages in this important region. Based on an analysis of 318 individuals using mtDNA ATPase 6/8 sequence and restriction fragment length polymorphism data, we found eight distinct clades that are closely associated with biogeographic patterns. The branching patterns among the clades and a Bayesian clock analysis suggest a relatively rapid colonization and diversification among drainages in the emergent Isthmus of Panama followed by the coalescing of some drainages due to historical connections. We also present evidence for extensive cross-cordillera sharing of clades in central Panama and the Canal region. Our results suggest that contemporary phylogeographic patterns and diversification in Lower Central American fishes reflect an interaction of historical drainage connections, dispersal, and demographic processes.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23008800 PMCID: PMC3447354 DOI: 10.1155/2012/780169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Evol Biol ISSN: 2090-052X
Figure 1Map showing (a) sampling locations used in this study and (b) the distribution range of A. coeruleopunctatus. In addition, the frequency of ATP6/8 clades and the sample size used to estimate clade frequencies are included. Drainage areas and biogeographic regions follow those of Smith and Bermingham [4]: (1) Rio Cocle del Norte; (2) Rio Indio; (3) Rio Chagres; (4) Rio Cascajal; (5) Rio Pina Pina; (6) Rio Cuango; (7) Rio Mandinga; (8) Rio Azucar; (9) Rio Playon Chico; (10) Rio Acla; (11) Rio Coto; (12) Rio Chiriqui; (13) Rio San Felix; (14) Rio San Pablo; (15) Rio Santa Maria; (16) Rio Tebario; (17) Rio Tonosi; (18) Rio Oria; (19) Rio La Villa; (20) Rio Cocle del Sur; (21) Rio Anton; (22) Rio Farallon; (23) Rio Chame; (24) Rio Capoeira; (25) Rio Caimito; (26) Rio Grande; (27) Rio Pacora; (28) Rio Bayano; (29) Rio Tuira; (30) Rio Iglesia; (31) Rio Atrato, Colombia; (32) Rio Baudo, Colombia. The biogeographic areas are Chagres: 1–10; Chiriqui: 11–13; Santa Maria: 14–24; Tuira: 25–31. Values within pie charts are the drainage ID numbers used to estimate the frequency and the sample size.
Figure 2Phylogenetic relationship among mtDNA haplotypes. (a) ATP6/8 ML tree using the TRN+I+G model. Bootstrap support and clade confidence values (posterior probabilities from a Bayesian analysis) for major clades are above and below branches, respectively. (b) Origin of samples by rivers assigned to their biogeographic regions as described in Smith and Bermingham [4]. Branch colors reflect biogeographic regions or drainage areas as found in Figure 1. The inset map is a stylized representation of the range of the major clades along drainage and biogeographic boundaries.
Frequency of clades among drainages and biogeographic regions based on RFLP analysis of the ATP6/8 gene region.
| River | Biogeographic region or drainage | E | F | G | H | D | C |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rio Acla | Acla | 12 | 12 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| Rio Anton | Anton | 5 | 2 | 7 | ||||
| Rio Farallon | Anton | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Rio Cham | Anton | 1 | 1 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| Anton total | 6 | 5 | 11 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| Rio Atrato | Atrato | 9 | 9 | |||||
| Rio Baudo | Atrato | 5 | 5 | |||||
| Rio San Juan | Atrato | 6 | 6 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| Atrato total | 20 | 20 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Rio Cascajal | Chagres | 4 | 4 | |||||
| Rio Chagres | Chagres | 23 | 23 | |||||
| Rio Cuango | Chagres | 6 | 6 | |||||
| Rio Pina Pina | Chagres | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Rio Indio | Chagres | 6 | 6 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| Chagres total | 40 | 40 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Rio Chiriqui | Chiriqui | 8 | 8 | |||||
| Rio Coto | Chiriqui | 3 | 3 | |||||
| Rio San Felix | Chiriqui | 1 | 1 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| Chiriqui total | 12 | 12 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Rio Cocle del Norte | Cocle del Norte | 16 | 16 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| Rio Cocle del Sur | Cocle del Sur | 6 | 29 | 35 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Rio Azucar | San Blas | 8 | 8 | |||||
| Rio Mandinga | San Blas | 6 | 6 | |||||
| Rio Playon Chico | San Blas | 3 | 3 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| W. San Blas total | 17 | 17 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Rio San Pablo | Santa Maria | 10 | 10 | |||||
| Rio Tebario | Santa Maria | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Rio La Villa | Santa Maria | 6 | 6 | |||||
| Rio Oria | Santa Maria | 3 | 3 | |||||
| Rio Santa Maria | Santa Maria | 27 | 27 | |||||
| Rio Tonosi | Santa Maria | 2 | 2 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| Santa Maria total | 49 | 49 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Rio Bayano | Tuira | 54 | 54 | |||||
| Rio Iglesia | Tuira | 4 | 4 | |||||
| Rio Tuira | Tuira | 30 | 30 | |||||
| Rio Caimito | Tuira | 6 | 6 | |||||
| Rio Capira | Tuira | 4 | 4 | |||||
| Rio Grande | Tuira | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Rio Pacora | Tuira | 6 | 6 | |||||
|
| ||||||||
| Tuira total | 106 | 106 | ||||||
Figure 3Estimated range of divergence of major clades based on a relaxed Bayesian analysis. Clades are colored as in Figure 1. The inset map is a stylized representation of the range of the major clades along drainage and biogeographic boundaries.