Literature DB >> 23008442

Clinical and angiographic risk stratification and differential impact on treatment outcomes in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial.

Maria Mori Brooks1, Bernard R Chaitman, Richard W Nesto, Regina M Hardison, Frederick Feit, Bernard J Gersh, Ronald J Krone, Edward Y Sako, William J Rogers, Alan J Garber, Spencer B King, Charles J Davidson, Fumiaki Ikeno, Robert L Frye.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) trial assigned patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus to prompt coronary revascularization plus intensive medical therapy versus intensive medical therapy alone and reported no significant difference in mortality. Among patients selected for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, prompt coronary revascularization was associated with a significant reduction in death/myocardial infarction/stroke compared with intensive medical therapy. We hypothesized that clinical and angiographic risk stratification would affect the effectiveness of the treatments overall and within revascularization strata. METHODS AND
RESULTS: An angiographic risk score was developed from variables assessed at randomization; independent prognostic factors were myocardial jeopardy index, total number of coronary lesions, prior coronary revascularization, and left ventricular ejection fraction. The Framingham Risk Score for patients with coronary disease was used to summarize clinical risk. Cardiovascular event rates were compared by assigned treatment within high-risk and low-risk subgroups. Overall, no outcome differences between the intensive medical therapy and prompt coronary revascularization groups were seen in any risk stratum. The 5-year risk of death/myocardial infarction/stroke was 36.8% for intensive medical therapy compared with 24.8% for prompt coronary revascularization among the 381 coronary artery bypass graft surgery-selected patients in the highest angiographic risk tertile (P=0.005); this treatment effect was amplified in patients with both high angiographic and high Framingham risk (47.3% intensive medical therapy versus 27.1% prompt coronary revascularization; P=0.010; hazard ratio=2.10; P=0.009). Treatment group differences were not significant in other clinical-angiographic risk groups within the coronary artery bypass graft surgery stratum, or in any subgroups within the percutaneous coronary intervention stratum.
CONCLUSION: Among patients with diabetes mellitus and stable ischemic heart disease, a strategy of prompt coronary artery bypass graft surgery significantly reduces the rate of death/myocardial infarction MI/stroke in those with extensive coronary artery disease or impaired left ventricular function. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00006305.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23008442      PMCID: PMC4104411          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.092973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  21 in total

1.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.

Authors:  Nico H J Pijls; William F Fearon; Pim A L Tonino; Uwe Siebert; Fumiaki Ikeno; Bernhard Bornschein; Marcel van't Veer; Volker Klauss; Ganesh Manoharan; Thomas Engstrøm; Keith G Oldroyd; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A MacCarthy; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Primary and subsequent coronary risk appraisal: new results from the Framingham study.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino; M W Russell; D M Huse; R C Ellison; H Silbershatz; P W Wilson; S C Hartz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Long-term survival after coronary artery bypass surgery stratified by EuroSCORE.

Authors:  Francesca O'Boyle; Neeraj Mediratta; Brian Fabri; Mark Pullan; John Chalmers; James McShane; Mathew Shaw; Michael Poullis
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study.

Authors:  Nico H J Pijls; Pepijn van Schaardenburgh; Ganesh Manoharan; Eric Boersma; Jan-Willem Bech; Marcel van't Veer; Frits Bär; Jan Hoorntje; Jacques Koolen; William Wijns; Bernard de Bruyne
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Modifications of coronary risk factors.

Authors:  Jeanine Albu; Sheldon H Gottlieb; Phyllis August; Richard W Nesto; Trevor J Orchard
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  A simple clinical score accurately predicts outcome in a community-based population undergoing stress testing.

Authors:  Todd D Miller; Veronique L Roger; David O Hodge; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival of patients with a low ejection fraction.

Authors:  E Passamani; K B Davis; M J Gillespie; T Killip
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-06-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Coronary artery atherosclerosis: severity of the disease, severity of angina pectoris and compromised left ventricular function.

Authors:  D M Leaman; R W Brower; G T Meester; P Serruys; M van den Brand
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Baseline coronary angiographic findings in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial (BARI 2D).

Authors:  Leonard Schwartz; Kevin E Kip; Edwin Alderman; Jiang Lu; Eric R Bates; Vankeepuram Srinivas; Richard G Bach; Lisa D Mighton; Frederick Feit; Spencer King; Robert L Frye
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Patrick W Serruys; Marie-Claude Morice; A Pieter Kappetein; Antonio Colombo; David R Holmes; Michael J Mack; Elisabeth Ståhle; Ted E Feldman; Marcel van den Brand; Eric J Bass; Nic Van Dyck; Katrin Leadley; Keith D Dawkins; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  18 in total

1.  Does ischemia burden in stable coronary artery disease effectively identify revascularization candidates? Ischemia burden in stable coronary artery disease does not effectively identify revascularization candidates.

Authors:  Harmony R Reynolds; Michael H Picard; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 2.  Is ischemia the most powerful indicator of myocardial viability?

Authors:  Jamshid Shirani
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Coronary artery bypass in patients with type 2 diabetes: experience from the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes trial.

Authors:  Edward Y Sako; Maria Mori Brooks; Regina M Hardison; Hartzel Schaff; Robert L Frye
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 4.  Advances in Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease: the Role of Revascularization?

Authors:  Konstantinos V Voudris; Clifford J Kavinsky
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-03-11

Review 5.  The myth of 'stable' coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Keith A A Fox; Marco Metra; João Morais; Dan Atar
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  BARI 2D: A Reanalysis Focusing on Cardiovascular Events.

Authors:  Saul M Genuth; Helen Vlachos; Maria Mori Brooks; John P Bantle; Bernard R Chaitman; Jennifer Green; Sheryl F Kelsey; Spencer B King; Robert McBane; Edward Y Sako; David J Schneider; Michael Steffes; Robert L Frye
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Appropriate revascularization in stable angina: lessons from the BARI 2D trial.

Authors:  Ronald J Krone; Andrew D Althouse; Jacqueline Tamis-Holland; Lakshmi Venkitachalam; Arturo Campos; Alan Forker; Alice K Jacobs; Salvador Ocampo; George Steiner; Francisco Fuentes; Ivan R Pena Sing; Maria Mori Brooks
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Initial Invasive Versus Conservative Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease in Patients With a History of Heart Failure or Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial.

Authors:  Renato D Lopes; Karen P Alexander; Susanna R Stevens; Harmony R Reynolds; Gregg W Stone; Ileana L Piña; Frank W Rockhold; Ahmed Elghamaz; Jose Luis Lopez-Sendon; Pedro S Farsky; Alexander M Chernyavskiy; Ariel Diaz; Denis Phaneuf; Mark A De Belder; Yi-Tong Ma; Luis A Guzman; Michel Khouri; Alessandro Sionis; Derek J Hausenloy; Rolf Doerr; Joseph B Selvanayagam; Aldo Pietro Maggioni; Judith S Hochman; David J Maron
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  IACTS position statement on "2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization": section 7.1-a consensus document.

Authors:  Om Prakash Yadava; Pradeep Narayan; Chandrasekar Padmanabhan; Lokeswara Rao Sajja; Kunal Sarkar; Praveen Kerala Varma; Vivek Jawali
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-01-22

10.  Myocardial Infarction in the ISCHEMIA Trial: Impact of Different Definitions on Incidence, Prognosis, and Treatment Comparisons.

Authors:  Bernard R Chaitman; Karen P Alexander; Derek D Cyr; Jeffrey S Berger; Harmony R Reynolds; Sripal Bangalore; William E Boden; Renato D Lopes; Marcin Demkow; Gian Piero Perna; Robert K Riezebos; Edward O McFalls; Subhash Banerjee; Akshay Bagai; Gilbert Gosselin; Sean M O'Brien; Frank W Rockhold; David D Waters; Kristian A Thygesen; Gregg W Stone; Harvey D White; David J Maron; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.