Literature DB >> 3873614

A randomized trial of coronary artery bypass surgery. Survival of patients with a low ejection fraction.

E Passamani, K B Davis, M J Gillespie, T Killip.   

Abstract

The Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) was designed to compare medical and surgical treatment of selected patients with chronic, stable coronary artery disease. This report concerns a subset of patients with reduced ventricular function. Of 780 patients randomly assigned to medical or surgical treatment, 160 had ejection fractions above 0.34 but below 0.50 at base line and have been followed for an average of seven years. Eighty-two patients were assigned to medical therapy, and 78 to surgery; the two groups were comparable at base line with regard to prognostically important variables. At seven years, 84 per cent of patients in the surgical group were alive, as compared with 70 per cent of the medical group (P = 0.01). Nearly half the patients with impaired ventricular function had triple-vessel disease at entry; at seven years, observed survival in this group was 88 and 65 per cent for those assigned to surgical and medical treatment, respectively (P = 0.009). Survival of patients with single-vessel or double-vessel disease was similar in the two treatment groups. We conclude that patients with triple-vessel disease and ejection fractions higher than 0.34 but lower than 0.50 appear to have improved seven-year survival with elective bypass surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3873614     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198506273122603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  74 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of cardiac diseases: evidence based or experience based medicine?

Authors:  W Kübler
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Long-term survival of patients with low ejection fraction: surgical versus medical management.

Authors:  V Balu; L Szmedra; D Dean; J Bhayana
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1988

3.  Consequences of variation in treatment for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  C L Pashos; B J McNeil
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Hibernation and myocardial ischemia: clinical detection by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  N G Uren; P G Camici
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 5.  Recovery of myocardial function in the hibernating heart.

Authors:  C W Hamm
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 6.  Will drug-eluting stents replace coronary artery bypass surgery?

Authors:  Ross M Reul
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

Review 7.  Stents or surgery: the case for stents.

Authors:  James M Wilson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

Review 8.  Silent myocardial ischaemia. Implications for therapy.

Authors:  N G Uren; D P Lipkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Coronary bypass graft surgery: reexamining the assumptions.

Authors:  H S Friedman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Chronic coronary artery disease: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Andrew Cassar; David R Holmes; Charanjit S Rihal; Bernard J Gersh
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.616

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.