Literature DB >> 23002358

Indomethacin but not a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor inhibits esophageal adenocarcinogenesis in rats.

Paula Esquivias1, Antonio Morandeira, Alfredo Escartín, Carmelo Cebrián, Sonia Santander, Francisco Esteva, María Asunción García-González, Javier Ortego, Angel Lanas, Elena Piazuelo.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the effects of indomethacin [dual cyclooxygenase (COX)-1/COX-2 inhibitor] and 3-(3,4-difluorophenyl)-4-(4-(methylsulfonyl) phenyl)-2-(5H)-furanone (MF-tricyclic) (COX-2 selective inhibitor) in a rat experimental model of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: A total of 112 surviving post-surgery rats were randomly divided into three groups: the control group (n = 48), which did not receive any treatment; the indomethacin group (n = 32), which were given 2 mg/kg per day of the COX-1/COX-2 inhibitor; and the MF-tricyclic group (n = 32), which received 10 mg/kg per day of the selective COX-2 inhibitor. Randomly selected rats were killed either 8 wk or 16 wk after surgery. The timing of the deaths was in accordance with a previous study performed in our group. Only rats that were killed at the times designated by the protocol were included in the study. We then assessed the histology and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) expression levels in the rat esophagi. An additional group of eight animals that did not undergo esophagojejunostomy were included in order to obtain normal esophageal tissue as a control.
RESULTS: Compared to a control group with no treatment (vehicle-treated rats), indomethacin treatment was associated with decreases in ulcerated esophageal mucosa (16% vs 35% and 14% vs 17%, 2 mo and 4 mo after surgery, respectively; P = 0.021), length of intestinal metaplasia in continuity with anastomosis (2 ± 1.17 mm vs 2.29 ± 0.75 mm and 1.25 ± 0.42 mm vs 3.5 ± 1.54 mm, 2 mo and 4 mo after surgery, respectively; P = 0.007), presence of intestinal metaplasia beyond anastomosis (20% vs 71.4% and 0% vs 60%, 2 mo and 4 mo after surgery, respectively; P = 0.009), severity of dysplasia (0% vs 71.4% and 20% vs 85.7% high-grade dysplasia, 2 mo and 4 mo after surgery, respectively; P = 0.002), and adenocarcinoma incidence (0% vs 57.1% and 0% vs 60%, 2 mo and 4 mo after surgery, respectively; P < 0.0001). Treatment with the selective COX-2 inhibitor, MF-tricyclic, did not prevent development of intestinal metaplasia or adenocarcinoma. In parallel, we observed a significant decrease in PGE2 levels in indomethacin-treated rats, but not in those treated with MF-tricyclic, at both 2 mo and 4 mo. Compared to control rats that did not undergo surgery (68 ± 8 ng/g, P = 0.0022 Kruskal-Wallis test) there was a significant increase in PGE2 levels in the esophageal tissue of the rats that underwent surgery either 2 mo (1332 ± 656 ng/g) or 4 mo (1121 ± 1015 ng/g) after esophagojejunostomy. However, no differences were found when esophageal PGE2 levels were compared 2 mo vs 4 mo post-esophagojejunostomy. At both the 2- and 4-mo timepoints, we observed a significant decrease in PGE2 levels in indomethacin-treated rat esophagi compared to those in either the control or MF-tricyclic groups (P = 0.049 and P = 0.017, respectively). No differences in PGE2 levels were found when we compared levels in rats treated with MF-tricyclic to not-treated rats.
CONCLUSION: In this rat model of gastrointestinal reflux, indomethacin was associated with a decrease in the severity of esophagitis and reduced development of esophageal intestinal metaplasia and adenocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal adenocarcinoma; Indomethacin; Intestinal metaplasia; MF-tricyclic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23002358      PMCID: PMC3447268          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i35.4866

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  29 in total

1.  Phenotype of columnar-lined esophagus in rats with esophagogastroduodenal anastomosis: similarity to human Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Yinghao Su; Xiaoxin Chen; Michael Klein; Ming Fang; Su Wang; Chung S Yang; Raj K Goyal
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 2.  Cyclooxygenase-independent actions of cyclooxygenase inhibitors.

Authors:  I Tegeder; J Pfeilschifter; G Geisslinger
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography of arachidonic acid metabolites formed by cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenases.

Authors:  W S Powell
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  Simultaneous determination of hydrocortisone, dexamethasone, indomethacin, phenylbutazone and oxyphenbutazone in equine serum by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  E Grippa; L Santini; G Castellano; M T Gatto; M G Leone; L Saso
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl       Date:  2000-01-28

5.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with activity against either cyclooxygenase 1 or cyclooxygenase 2 inhibit colorectal cancer in a DMH rodent model by inducing apoptosis and inhibiting cell proliferation.

Authors:  W A Brown; S A Skinner; C Malcontenti-Wilson; D Vogiagis; P E O'Brien
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Chemoprevention of esophageal adenocarcinoma by COX-2 inhibitors in an animal model of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Navtej S Buttar; Kenneth K Wang; Olga Leontovich; Jay Y Westcott; Rodney J Pacifico; Marlys A Anderson; Krishnawatie K Krishnadath; Lori S Lutzke; Lawrence J Burgart
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Involvement of prostaglandin E receptor subtype EP(4) in colon carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Michihiro Mutoh; Kouji Watanabe; Tomohiro Kitamura; Yutaka Shoji; Mami Takahashi; Toshihiko Kawamori; Kousuke Tani; Michiyoshi Kobayashi; Takayuki Maruyama; Kaoru Kobayashi; Shuichi Ohuchida; Yukihiko Sugimoto; Shuh Narumiya; Takashi Sugimura; Keiji Wakabayashi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  COX-2 inhibition in esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus and esophageal cancer.

Authors:  E Piazuelo; P Jimenez; A Lanas
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.116

9.  Selective COX-2 inhibition is associated with decreased mucosal damage induced by acid and pepsin in rabbit esophagitis.

Authors:  Angel Lanas; Pilar Jiménez; Angel Ferrández; Alfredo Escartín; Juan Arenas; Francisco Esteva; Javier Ortego
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.092

10.  Overexpression of 5-lipoxygenase in rat and human esophageal adenocarcinoma and inhibitory effects of zileuton and celecoxib on carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Xiaoxin Chen; Su Wang; Nan Wu; Sandeep Sood; Peng Wang; Zhe Jin; David G Beer; Thomas J Giordano; Yong Lin; Wei-Chung J Shih; Ronald A Lubet; Chung S Yang
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Role of chemoprophylaxis with either NSAIDs or statins in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Panagiotis Tsibouris; Erasmia Vlachou; Peter Edward Thomas Isaacs
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-02-06

Review 2.  A review of the epidemiology of Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jennifer L Schneider; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.043

3.  Aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and the risk of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Jennifer L Schneider; Wei K Zhao; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.199

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.