Literature DB >> 11910360

Chemoprevention of esophageal adenocarcinoma by COX-2 inhibitors in an animal model of Barrett's esophagus.

Navtej S Buttar1, Kenneth K Wang, Olga Leontovich, Jay Y Westcott, Rodney J Pacifico, Marlys A Anderson, Krishnawatie K Krishnadath, Lori S Lutzke, Lawrence J Burgart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Carcinogenesis in Barrett's esophagus (BE) is associated with an increased expression of cyclooxygenase (COX) 2. However, there has been no direct evidence that inhibition of COX-2 prevents cancer in BE. We studied the effect of MF-Tricyclic, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, on the development of BE and adenocarcinoma in a rat model.
METHODS: Four weeks after esophagojejunostomy, 105 Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to a chow containing MF-Tricyclic or Sulindac, or a placebo. Ninety-six (92%) rats completed the study and were sacrificed at 28 +/- 2 weeks. The animals were assessed for the presence of cancer, tumor volume, BE, degree of inflammation, and COX-2 expression and activity.
RESULTS: MF-Tricyclic and Sulindac reduced the relative risk of development of esophageal cancer by 55% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 43%-66%, P < 0.008) and by 79% (95% CI = 68%-87%, P < 0.001), respectively, compared with controls. No significant differences were noted in the risk of esophageal cancer between the MF-Tricyclic and the Sulindac group (P = 0.34). The median tumor volume was not significantly different among the 3 groups (P = 0.081). Moderate to severe degree of inflammation was significantly more common (P = 0.005) in the control compared with the MF-Tricyclic and the Sulindac group; however, the prevalence of BE was not significantly different between groups (P = 0.98). Rats in the control group had higher tissue PGE2 level compared with the MF-Tricyclic and Sulindac groups (P = 0.038).
CONCLUSIONS: Selective and nonselective COX-2 inhibitors can inhibit inflammation, COX-2 activity, and development of adenocarcinoma induced by reflux. This provides direct evidence that COX-2 inhibitors may have chemopreventive potential in BE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11910360     DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.32371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  97 in total

1.  Ablative mucosectomy is the procedure of choice to prevent Barrett's cancer.

Authors:  R C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Chemopreventive potential of natural compounds in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Mohammad Aminur Rahman; A R M Ruhul Amin; Dong M Shin
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.900

3.  Deoxycholic acid causes DNA damage while inducing apoptotic resistance through NF-κB activation in benign Barrett's epithelial cells.

Authors:  Xiaofang Huo; Stefanie Juergens; Xi Zhang; Davood Rezaei; Chunhua Yu; Eric D Strauch; Jian-Ying Wang; Edaire Cheng; Frank Meyer; David H Wang; Qiuyang Zhang; Stuart J Spechler; Rhonda F Souza
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 4.  Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters; Jeffrey A Hagen; Steven R DeMeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Barrett's esophagus: best of Digestive Disease Week 2003.

Authors:  Michael Jean; Kulwinder Dua
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2004-06

6.  Impact of the biliary diversion procedure on carcinogenesis in Barrett's esophagus surgically induced by duodenoesophageal reflux in rats.

Authors:  Koji Nishijima; Koichi Miwa; Tomoharu Miyashita; Shinichi Kinami; Itasu Ninomiya; Sachio Fushida; Takashi Fujimura; Takanori Hattori
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Early events during neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Brian J Reid
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 8.  Review: Experimental models for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Katherine S Garman; Roy C Orlando; Xiaoxin Chen
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.052

9.  Expression of cyclooxygenase 2, microsomal prostaglandin E synthase 1, and EP receptors is increased in rat oesophageal squamous cell dysplasia and Barrett's metaplasia induced by duodenal contents reflux.

Authors:  T J Jang; S K Min; J D Bae; K H Jung; J I Lee; J R Kim; W S Ahn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Composite score of reflux symptoms in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Jin-Hai Wang; Jin-Yan Luo; Lei Dong; Jun Gong; Ai-Li Zuo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.