Literature DB >> 11845244

Dynamic visual acuity during passive and self-generated transient head rotation in normal and unilaterally vestibulopathic humans.

Jun-ru Tian1, Igor Shubayev, Joseph L Demer.   

Abstract

To determine whether dynamic visual acuity (DVA) during head rotations on the stationary body can lateralize unilateral vestibular deafferentation and detect non-labyrinthine compensation mechanisms, 15 normal and 11 subjects with unilateral vestibular deafferentation underwent manually imposed and self-generated transient yaw head rotations during measurement of binocular DVA. DVA was measured by a four-alternative, forced choice, staircase procedure with optotype presentation only when head velocity exceeded thresholds of 50 degree or 75 degree/s. Eye and head movements were recorded using search coils to characterize ocular motor strategies. During directionally unpredictable, manually imposed contralesional rotation, unilaterally deafferented subjects had decreases in DVA from the static condition of 0.36 +/- 0.22 and 0.47 +/- 0.53 log of the minimum angle resolvable (logMAR, mean +/- SD), respectively, for 50 degree and 75 degree/s thresholds, not significantly greater than those of normal subjects (0.26 +/- 0.13 and 0.36 +/- 0.14, P>0.05). However, during manually imposed ipsilesional rotation, vestibulopathic subjects had decreases in DVA of 0.66 +/- 0.36 and 1.08 +/- 0.47 logMAR, significantly greater than during contralesional rotation ( P<0.01). The DVA reduction difference for the ipsi- and contralesional directions was less during self-generated than during manually imposed head rotations. The directional difference for manually administered head rotations yielded a robust diagnostic measure with essentially no overlap in performance with normal subjects. Diagnostic performance for DVA during self-generated head rotation was poorer. Recordings of eye and head movements made using search coils during DVA testing confirmed a deficient vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) during ipsilesional rotation, with most unilaterally vestibulopathic subjects employing predictive smooth eye movements and vestibular catch-up saccades. Measurement of DVA during transient head rotation on the body thus reliably can detect and lateralize vestibular pathology and compensatory mechanisms. Extravestibular mechanisms for compensation appear more effective during self-generated than manually imposed head rotations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11845244     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-001-0959-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  Dynamic visual acuity during passive head thrusts in canal planes.

Authors:  Michael C Schubert; Americo A Migliaccio; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-06-30

2.  Responses of neurons in the rostral ventrolateral medulla to whole body rotations: comparisons in decerebrate and conscious cats.

Authors:  V J Destefino; D A Reighard; Y Sugiyama; T Suzuki; L A Cotter; M G Larson; N J Gandhi; S M Barman; B J Yates
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-04-14

3.  Effects of distance and duration on vertical dynamic visual acuity in screening healthy adults and people with vestibular disorders.

Authors:  Brian T Peters; Helen S Cohen; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Rehabilitation of dynamic visual acuity in patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction: earlier is better.

Authors:  Lacour Michel; Tardivet Laurent; Thiry Alain
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Temporal dynamics of semicircular canal and otolith function following acute unilateral vestibular deafferentation in humans.

Authors:  Jun-ru Tian; Akira Ishiyama; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The influence of age and vestibular disorders on gaze stabilization: a pilot study.

Authors:  Miranda R Pritcher; Susan L Whitney; Gregory F Marchetti; Joseph M Furman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Mechanism of dynamic visual acuity recovery with vestibular rehabilitation.

Authors:  Michael C Schubert; Americo A Migliaccio; Richard A Clendaniel; Amir Allak; John P Carey
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Dynamic visual acuity testing for screening patients with vestibular impairments.

Authors:  Brian T Peters; Ajitkumar P Mulavara; Helen S Cohen; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Jacob J Bloomberg
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Effect of vestibular rehabilitation on passive dynamic visual acuity.

Authors:  Matthew Scherer; Americo A Migliaccio; Michael C Schubert
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  Three dimensional kinematics of rapid compensatory eye movements in humans with unilateral vestibular deafferentation.

Authors:  Jun-Ru Tian; Benjamin T Crane; Akira Ishiyama; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.