Literature DB >> 22999595

Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize.

Gilles-Eric Séralini1, Emilie Clair, Robin Mesnage, Steeve Gress, Nicolas Defarge, Manuela Malatesta, Didier Hennequin, Joël Spiroux de Vendômois.   

Abstract

The health effects of a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize (from 11% in the diet), cultivated with or without Roundup, and Roundup alone (from 0.1 ppb in water), were studied 2 years in rats. In females, all treated groups died 2-3 times more than controls, and more rapidly. This difference was visible in 3 male groups fed GMOs. All results were hormone and sex dependent, and the pathological profiles were comparable. Females developed large mammary tumors almost always more often than and before controls, the pituitary was the second most disabled organ; the sex hormonal balance was modified by GMO and Roundup treatments. In treated males, liver congestions and necrosis were 2.5-5.5 times higher. This pathology was confirmed by optic and transmission electron microscopy. Marked and severe kidney nephropathies were also generally 1.3-2.3 greater. Males presented 4 times more large palpable tumors than controls which occurred up to 600 days earlier. Biochemistry data confirmed very significant kidney chronic deficiencies; for all treatments and both sexes, 76% of the altered parameters were kidney related. These results can be explained by the non linear endocrine-disrupting effects of Roundup, but also by the overexpression of the transgene in the GMO and its metabolic consequences.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22999595     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  51 in total

1.  Removing Bt eggplant from the face of Indian regulators.

Authors:  Pushpendra Kumar Gupta; Bhagirath Choudhary; Godelieve Gheysen
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  EFSA's scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead.

Authors:  Yann Devos; Jaime Aguilera; Zoltán Diveki; Ana Gomes; Yi Liu; Claudia Paoletti; Patrick du Jardin; Lieve Herman; Joe N Perry; Elisabeth Waigmann
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  How safe does transgenic food need to be?

Authors:  Laura DeFrancesco
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Contrary to popular belief.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Rat study sparks GM furore.

Authors:  Declan Butler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Facing up to Complexity: Implications for Our Social Experiments.

Authors:  Ronnie Hawkins
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 7.  New GMO regulations for old: Determining a new future for EU crop biotechnology.

Authors:  John Davison; Klaus Ammann
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.074

8.  Commentary to 'The postmodern assault on science' by Marcel Kuntz.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Herman
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 8.807

9.  From hard drives to flash drives to DNA drives.

Authors:  M Castillo
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Retracting Inconclusive Research: Lessons from the Séralini GM Maize Feeding Study.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  J Agric Environ Ethics       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.727

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.