Literature DB >> 35094107

Uterine rupture risk in a trial of labor after cesarean section with and without previous vaginal births.

Avraham Nahum-Yerushalmy1,2, Asnat Walfisch3,4, Michal Lipschuetz3,4, Joshua I Rosenbloom4,5, Doron Kabiri4,5, Hila Hochler3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous cesarean delivery (CD) is the main risk factor for uterine rupture when attempting a trial of labor. Previous vaginal delivery (PVD) is a predictor for the trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) success and a protective factor against uterine rupture. We aimed to assess the magnitude of PVD as a protective factor from uterine rupture.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, including women who underwent TOLACs from 2003 to 2015. Women with and without PVD were compared. Inclusion criteria were one previous CD, trial of labor at ≥ 24 weeks' gestation, and cephalic presentation. We excluded pre-labor intrauterine fetal death and fetal anomalies. The primary outcome was a uterine rupture. Secondary outcomes were maternal and fetal complications. Logistic regression modeling was applied to analyze the association between PVD and uterine rupture while controlling for confounders.
RESULTS: A total of 11,235 women were included, 6795 of which had a PVD. Women with PVD had significantly lower rates of uterine rupture (0.18% vs. 1.1%; OR 0.19, p < 0.001), were less likely to be delivered by an emergency CD (13.2% vs. 39.4%, OR 0.17, p < 0.0001), were more likely to undergo labor induction (OR 1.56, p < 0.0001), and were less likely to undergo an instrumental delivery (OR 0.14, p < 0.001). Logistic regression modeling revealed that PVD was the only independent protective factor, with an aOR of 0.22.
CONCLUSION: PVD is the most important protective factor from uterine rupture in patients undergoing TOLAC. A trial of labor following one CD should therefore be encouraged in these patients.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean delivery; Patient counseling; Risk; TOLAC; Vaginal delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35094107     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06368-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  22 in total

Review 1.  Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Jeanne-Marie Guise; Mary Anna Denman; Cathy Emeis; Nicole Marshall; Miranda Walker; Rongwei Fu; Rosalind Janik; Peggy Nygren; Karen B Eden; Marian McDonagh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Outcomes of Term Induction in Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Analysis of a Modern Obstetric Cohort.

Authors:  Justin R Lappen; David N Hackney; Jennifer L Bailit
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery.

Authors:  M Lydon-Rochelle; V L Holt; T R Easterling; D P Martin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Induction of labor in women with a scarred uterus: does grand multiparity affect the risk of uterine rupture?

Authors:  Hila Hochler; Tamar Wainstock; Michal Lipschuetz; Eyal Sheiner; Yossef Ezra; Simcha Yagel; Asnat Walfisch
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2019-12-20

5.  Trends, risk factors and pregnancy outcome in women with uterine rupture.

Authors:  Dror Ronel; Arnon Wiznitzer; Ruslan Sergienko; Alexander Zlotnik; Eyal Sheiner
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2009.

Authors:  Sayeedha F G Uddin; Alan E Simon
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-09

7.  The significance of a uterine rupture in subsequent births.

Authors:  Tamar Eshkoli; Adi Yehuda Weintraub; Joel Baron; Eyal Sheiner
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 8.  NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights.

Authors:  F Gary Cunningham; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Sarah S Brown; Thomas Michael Dean; Marilynn Frederiksen; Carol J Rowland Hogue; Tekoa King; Emily Spencer Lukacz; Laurence B McCullough; Wanda Nicholson; Nancy Frances Petit; Jeffrey Lynn Probstfield; Adele C Viguera; Cynthia A Wong; Sheila Cohen Zimmet
Journal:  NIH Consens State Sci Statements       Date:  2010-03-10

Review 9.  Uterine rupture during VBAC trial of labor: risk factors and fetal response.

Authors:  Nancy O'brien-Abel
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.388

10.  Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betran; Jiangfeng Ye; Ann-Beth Moller; João Paulo Souza; Jun Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.