Literature DB >> 18395037

Vaginal birth after cesarean: clinical risk factors associated with adverse outcome.

Kimberly D Gregory1, Lisa M Korst, Moshe Fridman, Ida Shihady, Paula Broussard, Arlene Fink, Linda Burnes Bolton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) success rates and maternal and neonatal complication rates for selected antenatal conditions. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a population-based cohort study using administrative discharge data for women delivering in California hospitals during 2002.
RESULTS: Among 41,450 women, 29.72% (12,320 of 41,450) had maternal, fetal, or placental conditions complicating pregnancy. Attempted VBAC rates and VBAC success rates varied widely by these clinical condition, ranging from 10% to 73%. The VBAC success rate for low-risk women (no conditions) was 73.76% vs 50.31% for high-risk women (at least 1 condition), P < .0001. Absolute rates of maternal and neonatal complications were low (less than 1-2%), and the rate of adverse events was higher in the high-risk clinical group as compared with the low-risk clinical group.
CONCLUSION: Variation in rates of VBAC success and childbirth morbidities can be partially attributed to clinical factors complicating pregnancy. Women without such conditions show improved VBAC success and fewer maternal and neonatal complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18395037     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2009.

Authors:  Sayeedha F G Uddin; Alan E Simon
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-09

2.  Association between type of health insurance and elective cesarean deliveries: New Jersey, 2004-2007.

Authors:  Marco D Huesch
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The Association between Hospital Frequency of Labor after Cesarean and Outcomes in California.

Authors:  Mekhala V Dissanayake; Marit L Bovbjerg; Ellen L Tilden; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2020-08-25

4.  Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy; S Katherine Laughon; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Helain J Landy; Judith U Hibbard; Shoshana Haberman; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Matthew K Hoffman; Kimberly D Gregory; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Christos G Hatjis; Paul van Veldhuisen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Factors associated with increased cesarean risk among African American women: evidence from California, 2010.

Authors:  Marco Huesch; Jason N Doctor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Planned mode of birth after previous caesarean section and special educational needs in childhood: a population-based record linkage cohort study.

Authors:  K E Fitzpatrick; J J Kurinczuk; M A Quigley
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 7.331

7.  Planned mode of delivery after previous cesarean section and short-term maternal and perinatal outcomes: A population-based record linkage cohort study in Scotland.

Authors:  Kathryn E Fitzpatrick; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Sohinee Bhattacharya; Maria A Quigley
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Oxytocin use in trial of labor after cesarean and its relationship with risk of uterine rupture in women with one previous cesarean section: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Huan Zhang; Haiyan Liu; Shouling Luo; Weirong Gu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Vaginal birth after caesarean versus elective repeat caesarean delivery after one previous caesarean section: a cost-effectiveness analysis in four European countries.

Authors:  Maaike Fobelets; Katrien Beeckman; Gilles Faron; Déirdre Daly; Cecily Begley; Koen Putman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.007

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.