Literature DB >> 22986044

The Community Assessment of Psychic Experience (CAPE) questionnaire as a screening-instrument in the detection of individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis.

Nilufar Mossaheb1, Jana Becker, Miriam R Schaefer, Claudia M Klier, Monika Schloegelhofer, Konstantinos Papageorgiou, G Paul Amminger.   

Abstract

Recent findings on intervention options in individuals at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis underline the necessity of a screening tool that facilitates early detection in low-threshold, non-specialized settings. The aim of this study was to examine, whether the Community Assessment of Psychic Experience (CAPE) could be used as a screening tool to detect individuals at an increased risk for developing psychosis in a clinical, help-seeking population. The utility of the CAPE was assessed against the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States (CAARMS). The CAPE is a 42-item self-report questionnaire that proved to be stable, reliable and valid for self reported psychotic-like experiences in the general population. 165 individuals between 13 and 24years of age were assessed for being at UHR for developing psychosis. 50.9% individuals were CAARMS-positive and 49.1% were CAARMS-negative. The ROC-analysis provided two cut-off points: The cut-off value of 3.20 in the positive dimension showed a sensitivity of 67%, a specificity of 73%, a positive predictive value of 72% and a negative predictive value of 68%. The cut-off value of 2.80 in the positive dimension showed a higher sensitivity (83%) and a better negative predictive value (74%), but a lower specificity (49%) and a reduced positive predictive value (63%). Our results show promise that the CAPE is a valid, simple and cost-effective instrument for detecting individuals at UHR in a clinical population. It may represent a useful screening tool for calling clinicians' attention to subjects with psychotic-like experiences.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22986044     DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  24 in total

1.  Identification of patients with recent-onset psychosis in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa: a pilot study with traditional health practitioners and diagnostic instruments.

Authors:  W Veling; J K Burns; E M Makhathini; S Mtshemla; S Nene; S Shabalala; N Mbatha; A Tomita; J Baumgartner; I Susser; H W Hoek; E Susser
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Cortical Gyrification, Psychotic-Like Experiences, and Cognitive Performance in Nonclinical Subjects.

Authors:  Ulrika Evermann; Christian Gaser; Bianca Besteher; Kerstin Langbein; Igor Nenadić
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Validation of a modified version of the PRIME screen for psychosis-risk symptoms in a non-clinical Kenyan youth sample.

Authors:  Akinkunle Owoso; David M Ndetei; Anne W Mbwayo; Victoria N Mutiso; Lincoln I Khasakhala; Daniel Mamah
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 3.735

4.  Precursors and correlates of transient and persistent longitudinal profiles of psychotic experiences from late childhood through early adulthood.

Authors:  Alexandros Rammos; Sarah A Sullivan; Daphne Kounali; Hannah J Jones; Gemma Hammerton; Lindsey A Hines; Glyn Lewis; Peter B Jones; Mary Cannon; Andrew Thompson; Dieter Wolke; Jon Heron; Stanley Zammit
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 10.671

5.  Three types of psychotic-like experiences in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Henry R Cowan; Vijay A Mittal
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.760

6.  Novel evidence that attributing affectively salient signal to random noise is associated with psychosis.

Authors:  Ana Catalan; Claudia J P Simons; Sonia Bustamante; Marjan Drukker; Aranzazu Madrazo; Maider Gonzalez de Artaza; Iñigo Gorostiza; Jim van Os; Miguel A Gonzalez-Torres
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Examination of the Neural Basis of Psychoticlike Experiences in Adolescence During Reward Processing.

Authors:  Evangelos Papanastasiou; Elias Mouchlianitis; Dan W Joyce; Philip McGuire; Tobias Banaschewski; Arun L W Bokde; Uli Bromberg; Christian Büchel; Erin Burke Quinlan; Sylvane Desrivières; Herta Flor; Vincent Frouin; Hugh Garavan; Philip Spechler; Penny Gowland; Andreas Heinz; Bernd Ittermann; Jean-Luc Martinot; Marie-Laure Paillère Martinot; Eric Artiges; Frauke Nees; Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos; Luise Poustka; Sabina Millenet; Juliane H Fröhner; Michael N Smolka; Henrik Walter; Robert Whelan; Gunter Schumann; Sukhwinder Shergill
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.596

8.  Working memory capacity and psychotic-like experiences in a general population sample of adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Tim B Ziermans
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Does assessment type matter? A measurement invariance analysis of online and paper and pencil assessment of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE).

Authors:  Marloes Vleeschouwer; Chris D Schubart; Cecile Henquet; Inez Myin-Germeys; Willemijn A van Gastel; Manon H J Hillegers; Jim J van Os; Marco P M Boks; Eske M Derks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Dimensions of Delusions and Attribution Biases along the Continuum of Psychosis.

Authors:  Suzanne Ho-wai So; Venus Tang; Patrick Wing-leung Leung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.