Literature DB >> 22985372

Development of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): reviewing measurement specific to the upper limb in tetraplegia.

Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan1, Armin Curt, Mary C Verrier, Michael G Fehlings.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Primary outcome measures for the upper limb in trials concerning human spinal cord injury (SCI) need to distinguish between functional and neurological changes and require satisfying psychometric properties for clinical application.
METHODS: The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) was developed by the International GRASSP Research and Design Team as a clinical outcome measure specific to the upper limbs for individuals with complete and incomplete tetraplegia (that is, paralysis or paresis). It can be administered across the continuum of recovery after acute cervical SCI. An international multicenter study (involving centers in North America and Europe) was conducted to apply the measure internationally and examine its applicability.
RESULTS: The GRASSP is a multimodal test comprising 5 subtests for each upper limb: dorsal sensation, palmar sensation (tested with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments), strength (tested with motor grading of 10 muscles), and prehension (distinguishes scores for qualitative and quantitative grasping). Thus, administration of the GRASSP results in 5 numerical scores that provide a comprehensive profile of upper-limb function. The established interrater and test-retest reliability for all subtests within the GRASSP range from 0.84 to 0.96 and from 0.86 to 0.98, respectively. The GRASSP is approximately 50% more sensitive (construct validity) than the International Standards of Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI) in defining sensory and motor integrity of the upper limb. The subtests show concurrence with the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), SCIM self-care subscales, and Capabilities of Upper Extremity Questionnaire (CUE) (the strongest concurrence to impairment is with self-perception of function [CUE], 0.57-0.83, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The GRASSP was found to demonstrate reliability, construct validity, and concurrent validity for use as a standardized upper-limb impairment measure for individuals with complete or incomplete tetraplegia. Responsiveness (follow-up from onset to 1 year postinjury) is currently being tested in international studies (in North America and Europe). The GRASSP can be administered early after injury, thus making it a tool that can be administered in acute care (in the ICU), rehabilitation, and outpatient clinics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22985372     DOI: 10.3171/2012.6.AOSPINE1258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  39 in total

1.  Interrater Reliability of the Pediatric Neuromuscular Recovery Scale for Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Andrea L Behrman; Shelley A Trimble; Laura C Argetsinger; MacKenzie T Roberts; M J Mulcahey; Lisa Clayton; Mary E Gregg; Doug Lorenz; Elizabeth M Ardolino
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2019

2.  Evaluation of the graded redefined assessment of strength, sensibility and prehension (GRASSP) in children with tetraplegia.

Authors:  M J Mulcahey; Christina Calhoun Thielen; Kathryn Dent; Rebecca Sinko; Cristina Sadowsky; Rebecca Martin; Lawrence C Vogel; Loren Davidson; Heather Taylor; Jackie Bultman; John Gaughan
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  The natural course of passive tenodesis grip in individuals with spinal cord injury with preserved wrist extension power but paralyzed fingers and thumbs.

Authors:  Hae Yoon Jung; Jieun Lee; Hyung Ik Shin
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Comparison of Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) and the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP).

Authors:  Ralph J Marino; Rebecca Sinko; Anne Bryden; Deborah Backus; David Chen; Gregory A Nemunaitis; Benjamin E Leiby
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2018

5.  Validity and reliability of a locomotor stage-based functional rating scale in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  B Maurer-Burkhard; I Smoor; A von Reumont; G Deckstein; I Stierle; R Rupp; C Schuld
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 6.  Current and future medical therapeutic strategies for the functional repair of spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Tevfik Yılmaz; Erkan Kaptanoğlu
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-18

7.  Validation of the short version of the Van Lieshout Test in an Italian population with cervical spinal cord injuries: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anna Berardi; Alessio Biondillo; Maria Auxiliadora Màrquez; Rita De Santis; Giovanni Fabbrini; Marco Tofani; Donatella Valente; Giovanni Galeoto
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  The graded redefined assessment of strength sensibility and prehension version 2 (GV2): Psychometric properties.

Authors:  Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Colin Chan; Mary Verrier; Armin Curt; Michael Fehlings; Marc Bolliger; Inge-Marie Velstra
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  In cervical spondylotic myelopathy spinal cord motion is focally increased at the level of stenosis: a controlled cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Katharina Wolf; Markus Hupp; Susanne Friedl; Reto Sutter; Markus Klarhöfer; Patrick Grabher; Patrick Freund; Armin Curt
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 10.  Leveraging biomedical informatics for assessing plasticity and repair in primate spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jessica L Nielson; Jenny Haefeli; Ernesto A Salegio; Aiwen W Liu; Cristian F Guandique; Ellen D Stück; Stephanie Hawbecker; Rod Moseanko; Sarah C Strand; Sharon Zdunowski; John H Brock; Roland R Roy; Ephron S Rosenzweig; Yvette S Nout-Lomas; Gregoire Courtine; Leif A Havton; Oswald Steward; V Reggie Edgerton; Mark H Tuszynski; Michael S Beattie; Jacqueline C Bresnahan; Adam R Ferguson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.