Literature DB >> 22984676

Comparison of elective inguinal node irradiation techniques in anal cancer.

Jihye Cha1, Jinsil Seong, Ki Chang Keum, Chang Geol Lee, Woong Sub Koom.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare photon thunderbird with deep match (technique 1) with 3-field technique with electron inguinal boost (technique 2) in acute skin toxicity, toxicity-related treatment breaks and patterns of failure in elective inguinal radiation therapy (RT) for curative chemoradiation in anal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients treated between January 2008 and September 2010 without evidence of inguinal and distant metastasis were retrospectively reviewed. In 9 patients with technique 1, dose to inguinal and whole pelvis area was 41.4 to 45 Gy and total dose was 59.4 Gy. In 8 patients with technique 2, doses to inguinal, whole pelvis, gross tumor were 36 to 41.4 Gy, 36 to 41.4 Gy, and 45 to 54 Gy, respectively. The median follow-up period was 27.6 and 14.8 months in group technique 1 and 2, respectively.
RESULTS: The incidences of grade 3 radiation dermatitis were 56% (5 patients) and 50% (4 patients), dose ranges grade 3 dermatitis appeared were 41.4 to 50.4 Gy and 45 to 54 Gy in group technique 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.819). The areas affected by grade 3 dermatitis in 2 groups were as follow: perianal and perineal areas in 40% and 25%, perianal and inguinal areas in 0% and 50%, and perianal area only in 60% and 25%, respectively (p = 0.196). No inguinal failure has been observed.
CONCLUSION: Photon thunderbird with deep match technique and 3-field technique with electron inguinal boost showed similar incidence of radiation dermatitis. However, photon thunderbird with deep match seems to increase the possibility of severe perineal dermatitis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anus neoplasms; Chemoradiotherapy; Toxicity

Year:  2011        PMID: 22984676      PMCID: PMC3429908          DOI: 10.3857/roj.2011.29.4.236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Oncol J        ISSN: 2234-1900


  17 in total

1.  Results of salvage abdominoperineal resection for anal cancer after radiotherapy.

Authors:  M Pocard; E Tiret; K Nugent; N Dehni; R Parc
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in the treatment of locally advanced anal cancer: results of a phase III randomized trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Radiotherapy and Gastrointestinal Cooperative Groups.

Authors:  H Bartelink; F Roelofsen; F Eschwege; P Rougier; J F Bosset; D G Gonzalez; D Peiffert; M van Glabbeke; M Pierart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  The impact of gap duration on local control in anal canal carcinoma treated by split-course radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy.

Authors:  D C Weber; J M Kurtz; A S Allal
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Time-dose considerations in the treatment of anal cancer.

Authors:  E C Constantinou; W Daly; C Y Fung; C G Willett; D S Kaufman; T F DeLaney
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Role of mitomycin in combination with fluorouracil and radiotherapy, and of salvage chemoradiation in the definitive nonsurgical treatment of epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal: results of a phase III randomized intergroup study.

Authors:  M Flam; M John; T F Pajak; N Petrelli; R Myerson; S Doggett; J Quivey; M Rotman; H Kerman; L Coia; K Murray
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Results of definitive irradiation in a series of 305 epidermoid carcinomas of the anal canal.

Authors:  Elisabeth Deniaud-Alexandre; Emmanuel Touboul; Emmanuel Tiret; Alain Sezeur; Sidney Houry; Denis Gallot; Roland Parc; Rong Huang; Shuo-He Qu; Judith Huart; Françoise Pène; Michel Schlienger
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Epidermoid carcinoma of the anal canal. Results of curative-intent radiation therapy in a series of 270 patients.

Authors:  E Touboul; M Schlienger; L Buffat; D Lefkopoulos; F Pène; R Parc; E Tiret; D Gallot; M Malafosse; A Laugier
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal: management with combined chemo-radiation therapy.

Authors:  C C Cho; C W Taylor; A Padmanabhan; M W Arnold; P S Aguilar; D M Meesig; R S Hartmann; K S Khanduja; S M Rahman; W R Stewart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal: predictors of treatment outcome.

Authors:  Ramin Roohipour; Sujata Patil; Karyn A Goodman; Bruce D Minsky; W Douglas Wong; José G Guillem; Philip B Paty; Martin R Weiser; Heather B Neuman; Jinru Shia; Deborah Schrag; Larissa K F Temple
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Femoral vessel depth and the implications for groin node radiation.

Authors:  W J Koh; M Chiu; K J Stelzer; B E Greer; D Mastras; N Comsia; K J Russell; T W Griffin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  1 in total

1.  Indigenous Groin Board Immobilization Reduces Planning Target Volume Margins in Groin Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rahul Krishnatry; Akshay Mangaj; Rajesh Bhajbhuje; Vedang Murthy
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.