Literature DB >> 8244831

Femoral vessel depth and the implications for groin node radiation.

W J Koh1, M Chiu, K J Stelzer, B E Greer, D Mastras, N Comsia, K J Russell, T W Griffin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To quantify, based on pretreatment computer tomographic measurements, potential groin node depths, which will aid in optimal treatment planning for patients requiring groin node radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The pretreatment computer tomographic scans of 50 gynecologic cancer patients were reviewed to determine the distance of each femoral vessel beneath the overlying skin surface, as an indicator of potential groin node depth. Correlative data regarding height and weight were obtained from patient medical records, and were used to calculate the Quetelet index, defined as (weight in kg)/(height in m)2. Treatment parameters of 5 patients who failed prophylactic groin radiation in a recently published study were assessed to determine if underdosage represented a possible cause of failure.
RESULTS: Individual femoral vessel depths ranged from 2.0 to 18.5 cm. When the depths of all four femoral vessels were averaged in each patient, the mean "4-vessel average" depth for this patient population was 6.1 cm. The median Quetelet index for the group was 25.6, and there was a strong correlation between femoral vessel depth and patient Quetelet index. Recalculation of doses provided to the 5 patients failing prophylactic groin radiation in the Gynecologic Oncology Group study showed that all had received potential tumor doses < 4700 cGy, with 3 patients being underdosed by > 30%.
CONCLUSION: While surgery is often indicated in the management of patients with potential groin node metastases, the role of prophylactic groin radiation should not be rejected. Data from this study may aid in the optimal design and implementation of groin node radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8244831     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90476-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

1.  Challenges to delivery and effectiveness of adjuvant radiation therapy in elderly patients with node-positive vulvar cancer.

Authors:  Cameron W Swanick; Patricia J Eifel; Jinhai Huo; Larissa A Meyer; Grace L Smith
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Primary groin irradiation versus primary groin surgery for early vulvar cancer.

Authors:  Jacobus van der Velden; Guus Fons; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-05-11

3.  Comparison of elective inguinal node irradiation techniques in anal cancer.

Authors:  Jihye Cha; Jinsil Seong; Ki Chang Keum; Chang Geol Lee; Woong Sub Koom
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2011-12-28

4.  Effectiveness of Topical Lidocaine-Prilocaine Cream for Pain Control During Femoral Artery Catheterization in Adult Patients: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; Muhammad A Saleem; Nishath Naseem; Emrah Aytac; Cetin Kursad Akpinar; Shawn S Wallery
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2018-06

5.  Intensity modulated radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: Treatment technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Yuan James Rao; Anupama Chundury; Julie K Schwarz; Comron Hassanzadeh; Todd DeWees; Daniel Mullen; Matthew A Powell; David G Mutch; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-02-28

6.  Long Term Results of Radiotherapy in Vulvar Cancer Patients in Slovenia between 1997-2004.

Authors:  Helena Barbara Zobec Logar
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 2.991

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.