Literature DB >> 24834144

Prognostic value of baseline FDG uptake on PET-CT in esophageal carcinoma.

Omar S Al-Taan1, Amar Eltweri1, David Sharpe1, Peter M Rodgers1, Sukhbir S Ubhi1, David J Bowrey1.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the influence of baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on survival in a cohort of patients, undergoing positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan for esophageal carcinoma.
METHODS: The pre-treatment SUVmax numeric reading was determined in patients with confirmed esophageal or junctional cancer having PET-CT scan during the time period 1(st) January 2007 until 31(st) July 2012. A minimum follow up of 12 mo was required. Patients were subdivided into quartiles according to SUVmax value and the influence of SUVmax on survival was assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis. The following pre-treatment factors were investigated: patient characteristics, tumor characteristics and planned treatment.
RESULTS: The study population was 271 patients (191 male) with esophageal or junctional carcinoma. The median age was 65 years (range 40-85) and histologic subtype was adenocarcinoma in 197 patients and squamous carcinoma in 74 patients. The treatment intent was radical in 182 and palliative in 89 patients. SUVmax was linked to histologic subtype (P = 0.008), tumor site (P = 0.01) and Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage (P < 0.001). On univariate analysis, prognosis was significantly associated with SUVmax (P = 0.001), T-stage (P < 0.001) and UICC stage (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, only T-stage and UICC stage remained significant.
CONCLUSION: Pretreatment SUVmax was not a useful marker in isolation for determining prognosis of patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal neoplasms; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Positron emission tomography; Positron emission tomography-computed tomography; Prognosis

Year:  2014        PMID: 24834144      PMCID: PMC4021330          DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v6.i5.139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol


  25 in total

1.  Accuracy of PET-CT in predicting survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Claire Brown; Ben Howes; Glyn G Jamieson; Dylan Bartholomeusz; Urs Zingg; Thomas R Sullivan; Sarah K Thompson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  FDG PET and CT in locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the distal oesophagus. Clinical relevance of a discordant PET finding.

Authors:  A Stahl; J Stollfuss; K Ott; H Wieder; U Fink; M Schwaiger; W A Weber
Journal:  Nuklearmedizin       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.379

3.  [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography for the assessment of histopathologic response and prognosis after completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Vallböhmer; Arnulf H Hölscher; Markus Dietlein; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Stephan E Baldus; Stefan P Mönig; Ralf Metzger; Harald Schicha; Matthias Schmidt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Prognostic significance of SUV on PET/CT in patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  LingLing Pan; Ping Gu; Gang Huang; HuiPing Xue; ShuQi Wu
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.566

5.  Prognostic value of initial fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in esophageal cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Catherine Cheze-Le Rest; Jean-Philippe Metges; Pierre Teyton; Véronique Jestin-Le Tallec; P Lozac'h; A Volant; D Visvikis
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.690

6.  Prognostic significance of 18-FDG PET/CT and EUS-defined tumour characteristics in patients with oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  D S Y Chan; P Fielding; S A Roberts; T D Reid; R Ellis-Owen; W G Lewis
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 2.350

7.  Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Seung Hyup Hyun; Joon Young Choi; Young Mog Shim; Kwhanmien Kim; Su Jin Lee; Young Seok Cho; Ji Young Lee; Kyung-Han Lee; Byung-Tae Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  18FDG uptake in oesophageal adenocarcinoma: linking biology and outcome.

Authors:  Marinke Westerterp; Gerrit W Sloof; Otto S Hoekstra; Fiebo J W Ten Kate; Gerrit A Meijer; Johannes B Reitsma; Ronald Boellaard; J Jan B van Lanschot; Carla F M Molthoff
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  The higher the decrease in the standardized uptake value of positron emission tomography after chemoradiation, the better the survival of patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Heta Javeri; Lianchun Xiao; Eric Rohren; Jeffrey H Lee; Zhongxing Liao; Wayne Hofstetter; Dipen Maru; Manoop S Bhutani; Stephen G Swisher; Homer Macapinlac; Xuemei Wang; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Does the value of PET-CT extend beyond pretreatment staging? An analysis of survival in surgical patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Boris Sepesi; Daniel P Raymond; Marek Polomsky; Thomas J Watson; Virginia R Litle; Carolyn E Jones; Rui Hu; Xing Qiu; Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prognostic Significance of FDG PET/CT in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the Era of the 8th AJCC/UICC Staging System.

Authors:  Hyunjong Lee; Kyung Soo Lee; Yang Won Min; Hong Kwan Kim; Jae Ill Zo; Young Mog Shim; Joon Young Choi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Role of Pre-therapeutic (18)F-FDG PET/CT in Guiding the Treatment Strategy and Predicting Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Teik Hin Tan; Ching Yeen Boey; Boon Nang Lee
Journal:  Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2016
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.