OBJECTIVE: [corrected] To validate a tool to measure patient safety culture in Spanish primary care professionals. METHODS: Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture (MOSPSC), from the Agency for Healthcare and Research in Quality (AHRQ). The process has been performed in five steps: original version traslation, conceptual equivalence evaluation, acceptability and viability assessment, content validity and questionnaire test and response analysis and psichometric properties assessment. SETTING: Primary care. SUBJECTS: 185 Primary care professionals from different Spanish regions represented the sample test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frecuency, response pattern and discrimination power of each item. Cronbach's alpha coefficient and dimensions obtained through factor analysis. RESULTS: 17, 8% of respondents answered all the items and 28, 7% of them did not answer, or answered the option "Don't know/Does not apply", to one to four items. All the sentences, with only one exception, present discrimination capacity. Cronbach's alpha coefficient results 0,96 and information is sumarized in 15 factors obtaining the same items in 7 of the total 12 factors in the original questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Traslated, adapted, extended and validated AHRQ questionnaire is, in this setting, a reliable and useful instrument and it must be used for international comparisons.
OBJECTIVE: [corrected] To validate a tool to measure patient safety culture in Spanish primary care professionals. METHODS: Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture (MOSPSC), from the Agency for Healthcare and Research in Quality (AHRQ). The process has been performed in five steps: original version traslation, conceptual equivalence evaluation, acceptability and viability assessment, content validity and questionnaire test and response analysis and psichometric properties assessment. SETTING: Primary care. SUBJECTS: 185 Primary care professionals from different Spanish regions represented the sample test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frecuency, response pattern and discrimination power of each item. Cronbach's alpha coefficient and dimensions obtained through factor analysis. RESULTS: 17, 8% of respondents answered all the items and 28, 7% of them did not answer, or answered the option "Don't know/Does not apply", to one to four items. All the sentences, with only one exception, present discrimination capacity. Cronbach's alpha coefficient results 0,96 and information is sumarized in 15 factors obtaining the same items in 7 of the total 12 factors in the original questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Traslated, adapted, extended and validated AHRQ questionnaire is, in this setting, a reliable and useful instrument and it must be used for international comparisons.
Authors: Hana H Webair; Salwa S Al-Assani; Reema H Al-Haddad; Wafa H Al-Shaeeb; Manal A Bin Selm; Abdulla S Alyamani Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2015-10-13 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Maria J Serrano-Ripoll; Joana Ripoll; Joan Llobera; Jose Maria Valderas; Guadalupe Pastor-Moreno; Antonio Olry de Labry Lima; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: María Teresa González-Gil; Cristina González-Blázquez; Ana Isabel Parro-Moreno; Azucena Pedraz-Marcos; Ana Palmar-Santos; Laura Otero-García; María Victoria Navarta-Sánchez; María Teresa Alcolea-Cosín; María Teresa Argüello-López; Coro Canalejas-Pérez; María Elena Carrillo-Camacho; María Lourdes Casillas-Santana; María Luisa Díaz-Martínez; Asunción García-González; Eva García-Perea; Mercedes Martínez-Marcos; María Luisa Martínez-Martín; María Del Pilar Palazuelos-Puerta; Carmen Sellán-Soto; Cristina Oter-Quintana Journal: Intensive Crit Care Nurs Date: 2020-10-28 Impact factor: 3.072