Literature DB >> 15832843

The relationship between central corneal thickness-adjusted intraocular pressure and glaucomatous visual-field loss.

Michael Sullivan-Mee1, Kathy D Halverson, Glenn B Saxon, Mollie C Saxon, Kathleen M Shafer, Jeffrey A Sterling, Melissa J Sterling, Clifford Qualls.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT) is increasingly becoming an important component of glaucoma risk analysis, significant controversy exists regarding the benefit of calculating a corrected intraocular pressure (IOP) value from measured IOP and CCT data.
METHODS: Three hundred forty-four male subjects were identified from a VA eye clinic with one of the following clinical diagnoses: ocular hypertension (OHT), primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), normal tension glaucoma (NTG), and normal tension glaucoma suspect (NTGS). Using one eye per subject, multivariate logistic regression and correlational analyses were performed to determine relationships between glaucomatous visual-field loss and several glaucoma risk factors, including adjusted IOP values.
RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis did not identify CCT-adjusted IOP values as independent risk factors for development of either NTG or POAG-related glaucomatous visual-field loss. CCT, however, was found to be strongly associated with both NTG and POAG-related visual-field loss. Correlational analysis revealed a weak correlation between Ehlers-adjusted pre-treatment IOP and severity of POAG-related visual-field loss, but no other adjusted IOP values significantly correlated with severity of visual-field loss in either POAG or NTG.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that adjusted IOP, as calculated using current algorithms, is not useful within glaucoma risk analysis, since adjusted IOP was unable to predict either presence or severity of glaucomatous visual-field loss in this study. CCT, conversely, was found to be a robust and independent predictor of glaucomatous visual-field loss. These findings, while supporting routine CCT measurements for all glaucoma suspects, do not support routine clinical computation of adjusted IOP values using current algorithms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15832843     DOI: 10.1016/s1529-1839(05)70298-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optometry        ISSN: 1558-1527


  6 in total

1.  Luminance-modulated adaptation in the global flash mfERG: a preliminary study of early retinal functional changes in high-risk glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Patrick H W Chu; Yiu-fai Ng; Chi-ho To; Kwok-fai So; Brian Brown; Henry H L Chan
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  [Differentiation of ocular hypertension].

Authors:  E M Hoffmann; J Lamparter
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  Major review: Molecular genetics of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Yutao Liu; R Rand Allingham
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Differences in central corneal thickness between the paired eyes and the severity of the glaucomatous damage.

Authors:  M Iester; S Telani; P Frezzotti; G Manni; M Uva; M Figus; A Perdicchi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Comparison of a new anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Oculus Pentacam for measurement of anterior chamber depth and corneal thickness.

Authors:  Xuepei Li; Yijing Zhou; Charlotte Aimee Young; Aiming Chen; Guangming Jin; Danying Zheng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-07

6.  Measuring accurate IOPs: Does correction factor help or hurt?

Authors:  Pinakin Gunvant; Robert D Newcomb; Elliot M Kirstein; Victor E Malinovsky; Richard J Madonna; Richard E Meetz
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.