BACKGROUND: Up to 7% of patients with severe-to-profound deafness do not benefit from cochlear implantation. Given the high surgical implantation and clinical management cost of cochlear implantation (>$1 million lifetime cost), prospective identification of the worst performers would reduce unnecessary procedures and healthcare costs. Because cochlear implants bypass the membranous labyrinth but rely on the spiral ganglion for functionality, we hypothesize that cochlear implant (CI) performance is dictated in part by the anatomic location of the cochlear pathology that underlies the hearing loss. As a corollary, we hypothesize that because genetic testing can identify sites of cochlear pathology, it may be useful in predicting CI performance. METHODS: 29 adult CI recipients with idiopathic adult-onset severe-to-profound hearing loss were studied. DNA samples were subjected to solution-based sequence capture and massively parallel sequencing using the OtoSCOPE(®) platform. The cohort was divided into three CI performance groups (good, intermediate, poor) and genetic causes of deafness were correlated with audiometric data to determine whether there was a gene-specific impact on CI performance. RESULTS: The genetic cause of deafness was determined in 3/29 (10%) individuals. The two poor performers segregated mutations in TMPRSS3, a gene expressed in the spiral ganglion, while the good performer segregated mutations in LOXHD1, a gene expressed in the membranous labyrinth. Comprehensive literature review identified other good performers with mutations in membranous labyrinth-expressed genes; poor performance was associated with spiral ganglion-expressed genes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the underlying hypothesis that mutations in genes preferentially expressed in the spiral ganglion portend poor CI performance while mutations in genes expressed in the membranous labyrinth portend good CI performance. Although the low mutation rate in known deafness genes in this cohort likely relates to the ascertainment characteristics (postlingual hearing loss in adult CI recipients), these data suggest that genetic testing should be implemented as part of the CI evaluation to test this association prospectively.
BACKGROUND: Up to 7% of patients with severe-to-profound deafness do not benefit from cochlear implantation. Given the high surgical implantation and clinical management cost of cochlear implantation (>$1 million lifetime cost), prospective identification of the worst performers would reduce unnecessary procedures and healthcare costs. Because cochlear implants bypass the membranous labyrinth but rely on the spiral ganglion for functionality, we hypothesize that cochlear implant (CI) performance is dictated in part by the anatomic location of the cochlear pathology that underlies the hearing loss. As a corollary, we hypothesize that because genetic testing can identify sites of cochlear pathology, it may be useful in predicting CI performance. METHODS: 29 adult CI recipients with idiopathic adult-onset severe-to-profound hearing loss were studied. DNA samples were subjected to solution-based sequence capture and massively parallel sequencing using the OtoSCOPE(®) platform. The cohort was divided into three CI performance groups (good, intermediate, poor) and genetic causes of deafness were correlated with audiometric data to determine whether there was a gene-specific impact on CI performance. RESULTS: The genetic cause of deafness was determined in 3/29 (10%) individuals. The two poor performers segregated mutations in TMPRSS3, a gene expressed in the spiral ganglion, while the good performer segregated mutations in LOXHD1, a gene expressed in the membranous labyrinth. Comprehensive literature review identified other good performers with mutations in membranous labyrinth-expressed genes; poor performance was associated with spiral ganglion-expressed genes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the underlying hypothesis that mutations in genes preferentially expressed in the spiral ganglion portend poor CI performance while mutations in genes expressed in the membranous labyrinth portend good CI performance. Although the low mutation rate in known deafness genes in this cohort likely relates to the ascertainment characteristics (postlingual hearing loss in adult CI recipients), these data suggest that genetic testing should be implemented as part of the CI evaluation to test this association prospectively.
Authors: Maciej Wróbel; Magdalena Magierska-Krzysztoń; Krzysztof Szyfter; Dorota Mietkiewska; Witold Szyfter; Małgorzata Rydzanicz; Krzysztof Szyfter; Michał Karlik Journal: Cochlear Implants Int Date: 2008-09
Authors: P R Counter; M P Hilton; D Webster; T Wardell; R W Taylor; G Besley; D M Turnbull; P J Robinson Journal: J Laryngol Otol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 1.469
Authors: Lydie Fasquelle; Hamish S Scott; Marc Lenoir; Jing Wang; Guy Rebillard; Sophie Gaboyard; Stéphanie Venteo; Florence François; Anne-Laure Mausset-Bonnefont; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Elizabeth Neidhart; Christian Chabbert; Jean-Luc Puel; Michel Guipponi; Benjamin Delprat Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-03-21 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Glenn E Green; Daryl A Scott; Joshua M McDonald; Holly F B Teagle; Bruce J Tomblin; Linda J Spencer; George G Woodworth; John F Knutson; Bruce J Gantz; Val C Sheffield; Richard J H Smith Journal: Am J Med Genet Date: 2002-05-01
Authors: Elina Kari; Lorida Llaci; John L Go; Marcus Naymik; James A Knowles; Suzanne M Leal; Sampath Rangasamy; Matthew J Huentelman; Winnie Liang; Rick A Friedman; Isabelle Schrauwen Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2020 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Anna M H Korver; Richard J H Smith; Guy Van Camp; Mark R Schleiss; Maria A K Bitner-Glindzicz; Lawrence R Lustig; Shin-Ichi Usami; An N Boudewyns Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Jourdan T Holder; William Morrel; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford Journal: Otol Neurotol Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 2.311