Literature DB >> 21557232

Genetic characteristics in children with cochlear implants and the corresponding auditory performance.

Chen-Chi Wu1, Tien-Chen Liu, Shih-Hao Wang, Chuan-Jen Hsu, Che-Ming Wu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To explore the genetic characteristics of children with cochlear implants (CIs) and to correlate the auditory performance after implantation to the genetic diagnosis of children with CIs. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
METHODS: Mutations of four common deafness-associated genes, GJB2, SLC26A4, the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene, and OTOF, were screened in 743 unrelated children with idiopathic sensorineural hearing impairment, including 180 and 563 children with and without CIs, respectively. The allele frequencies and audiologic features were compared between both groups. The Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) scores at 3 years after implantation were then analyzed according to the genotypes.
RESULTS: A definitive genetic diagnosis was made in 37 (20.6%) of the 180 CI children. A significant difference in allele frequencies between CI and non-CI children was found in GJB2 mutations (chi-square test, P < .01), but not in SLC26A4 mutations, mitochondrial 12S rRNA mutations, or OTOF mutations (all P > .05). Further analysis revealed that the difference might have resulted from distinct audiological features in each group. Among the 110 CI children who had received more than 3 years of rehabilitation after implantation, the 35 children with mutations had better CAP scores than the 75 children without mutations.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant prevalence of genetic mutations was identified in children with CIs, suggesting the need for routine genetic assessments. The frequencies of common deafness-associated mutations were different between children with and without CIs. The presence of genetic mutations was associated with an excellent long-term auditory performance outcome after implantation.
Copyright © 2011 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21557232     DOI: 10.1002/lary.21751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  22 in total

1.  Prediction of cochlear implant performance by genetic mutation: the spiral ganglion hypothesis.

Authors:  Robert W Eppsteiner; A Eliot Shearer; Michael S Hildebrand; Adam P Deluca; Haihong Ji; Camille C Dunn; Elizabeth A Black-Ziegelbein; Thomas L Casavant; Terry A Braun; Todd E Scheetz; Steven E Scherer; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Richard J H Smith
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Congenital hearing loss.

Authors:  Anna M H Korver; Richard J H Smith; Guy Van Camp; Mark R Schleiss; Maria A K Bitner-Glindzicz; Lawrence R Lustig; Shin-Ichi Usami; An N Boudewyns
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 52.329

3.  The effect of GJB2 and SLC26A4 gene mutations on rehabilitative outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Yu-jun Yan; Yun Li; Tao Yang; Qi Huang; Hao Wu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Pendred syndrome: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Kirsty Biggs; Amy Lovett; Chris Metcalfe; Jameel Muzaffar; Peter Monksfield; Manohar Bance
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.017

Review 5.  [Personalized medicine in otology. The role of genetic diagnostics in patients with hearing impairment].

Authors:  N Friese; K Braun; M Müller; A Tropitzsch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  AudioGene: refining the natural history of KCNQ4, GSDME, WFS1, and COCH-associated hearing loss.

Authors:  Ryan K Thorpe; W Daniel Walls; Rae Corrigan; Amanda Schaefer; Kai Wang; Patrick Huygen; Thomas L Casavant; Richard J H Smith
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 5.881

7.  Screening Strategies for Deafness Genes and Functional Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Patients.

Authors:  Eric Nisenbaum; Sandra Prentiss; Denise Yan; Aida Nourbakhsh; Molly Smeal; Meredith Holcomb; Ivette Cejas; Fred Telischi; Xue Zhong Liu
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.619

8.  Identifying Children With Poor Cochlear Implantation Outcomes Using Massively Parallel Sequencing.

Authors:  Chen-Chi Wu; Yin-Hung Lin; Tien-Chen Liu; Kai-Nan Lin; Wei-Shiung Yang; Chuan-Jen Hsu; Pei-Lung Chen; Che-Ming Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Long-Term Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Children with GJB2 and SLC26A4 Mutations.

Authors:  Che-Ming Wu; Hui-Chen Ko; Yung-Ting Tsou; Yin-Hung Lin; Ju-Li Lin; Chin-Kuo Chen; Pei-Lung Chen; Chen-Chi Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Application of massively parallel sequencing to genetic diagnosis in multiplex families with idiopathic sensorineural hearing impairment.

Authors:  Chen-Chi Wu; Yin-Hung Lin; Ying-Chang Lu; Pei-Jer Chen; Wei-Shiung Yang; Chuan-Jen Hsu; Pei-Lung Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.