Literature DB >> 22974092

Evaluation of predictive markers for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Per Byström1, Åke Berglund, Peter Nygren, Lisa Wernroth, Birgitta Johansson, Anders Larsson, Bengt Glimelius.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the predictive and prognostic value of serum and plasma tumor markers, in comparison with clinical and biomedical parameters for response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with combination chemotherapy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: One-hundred and six patients with mCRC from three centers, part of a multicenter study, received irinotecan with the Nordic bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid schedule (FLIRI) or the de Gramont schedule (Lv5FU2-IRI). Blood samples for CEA, CA19-9, TPA, TIMP-1, SAA, transthyretin and CRP were taken at baseline and after two, four and eight weeks of treatment. Tumor marker levels at baseline and longitudinally were compared with responses evaluated (CT/MRI) after two and four months of treatment. The correlations to RR, PFS and OS were evaluated with regression analyses.
RESULTS: A significant correlation to OS was seen for baseline levels of all markers. In multivariate analyses with clinical parameters, TPA, CRP, SAA and TIMP-1 provided independent information. The baseline values of CEA, TPA and TIMP-1 were also significantly correlated to PFS and TPA to RR. Changes during treatment, i.e. the slope gave with the exception of CA19-9 for OS less information about outcomes. The best correlation to response was seen for CEA, CA19-9 and TPA with AUC values of 0.78, 0.83 and 0.79, respectively, using a combined model based upon an interaction between the slope and the baseline value.
CONCLUSIONS: Baseline tumor markers together with clinical parameters provide prognostic information about survival in patients with mCRC. The ability of the individual tumor markers to predict treatment response and PFS is limited. Changes in marker levels during the first two months of treatment are less informative of outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22974092     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.705020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  17 in total

1.  Scoring of prognostic parameters in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

Authors:  Masahide Ikeguchi; Ryugo Shimoda; Manabu Yamamoto; Yoshihiko Maeta; Keigo Ashida; Hiroaki Saito
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 1.641

2.  Evaluation of preoperative serum markers for individual patient prognosis in stage I-III rectal cancer.

Authors:  Clemens Giessen; Dorothea Nagel; Maria Glas; Fritz Spelsberg; Ulla Lau-Werner; Dominik Paul Modest; Marlies Michl; Volker Heinemann; Petra Stieber; Christoph Schulz
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-07-17

3.  Carcinoembryonic antigen reduction after medical treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Antonio Colloca; Antonella Venturino; Domenico Guarneri
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The risk of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients following adjuvant chemotherapy is predicted by the time course of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein by modelling.

Authors:  Ida Netterberg; Mats O Karlsson; Elisabet I Nielsen; Angelica L Quartino; Henrik Lindman; Lena E Friberg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer tumour markers and biomarkers: Recent therapeutic advances.

Authors:  Gustaw Lech; Robert Słotwiński; Maciej Słodkowski; Ireneusz Wojciech Krasnodębski
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Prognostic significance of the preoperative serum C-reactive protein level in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Masatsune Shibutani; Kiyoshi Maeda; Hisashi Nagahara; Eiji Noda; Hiroshi Ohtani; Yukio Nishiguchi; Kosei Hirakawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  IL-8, MSPa, MIF, FGF-9, ANG-2 and AgRP collection were identified for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer based on the support vector machine model.

Authors:  Mingfu Cui; Yanan Zhao; Zuocong Zhang; Yang Zhao; Songyun Han; Ruijie Wang; Dayong Ding; Xuedong Fang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Serum protein profiling reveals baseline and pharmacodynamic biomarker signatures associated with clinical outcome in mCRC patients treated with chemotherapy ± cediranib.

Authors:  A J C Pommier; R Shaw; S K M Spencer; S R Morgan; P M Hoff; J D Robertson; S T Barry; J M Jürgensmeier
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Prealbumin/CRP Based Prognostic Score, a New Tool for Predicting Metastasis in Patients with Inoperable Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Ali Esfahani; Nima Makhdami; Elnaz Faramarzi; Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi; Alireza Ostadrahimi; Mousa Ghayour Nahand; Zohreh Ghoreishi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 10.  C-Reactive Protein Is an Important Biomarker for Prognosis Tumor Recurrence and Treatment Response in Adult Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shiva Shrotriya; Declan Walsh; Nabila Bennani-Baiti; Shirley Thomas; Cliona Lorton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.