Literature DB >> 22972904

Honesty requires time (and lack of justifications).

Shaul Shalvi1, Ori Eldar, Yoella Bereby-Meyer.   

Abstract

Recent research suggests that refraining from cheating in tempting situations requires self-control, which indicates that serving self-interest is an automatic tendency. However, evidence also suggests that people cheat to the extent that they can justify their unethical behavior to themselves. To merge these different lines of research, we adopted a dual-system approach that distinguished between the intuitive and deliberative cognitive systems. We suggest that for people to restrict their dishonest behavior, they need to have enough time and no justifications for self-serving unethical behavior. We employed an anonymous die-under-cup task in which participants privately rolled a die and reported the outcome to determine their pay. We manipulated the time available for participants to report their outcome (short vs. ample). The results of two experiments support our prediction, revealing that the dark side of people's automatic self-serving tendency may be overcome when time to decide is ample and private justifications for dishonesty are not available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22972904     DOI: 10.1177/0956797612443835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  45 in total

1.  Winning a competition predicts dishonest behavior.

Authors:  Amos Schurr; Ilana Ritov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Self-serving dishonest decisions can show facilitated cognitive dynamics.

Authors:  Maryam Tabatabaeian; Rick Dale; Nicholas D Duran
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-06-17

3.  Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry.

Authors:  Alain Cohn; Ernst Fehr; Michel André Maréchal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Fraud and Understanding the Moral Mind: Need for Implementation of Organizational Characteristics into Behavioral Ethics.

Authors:  Petr Houdek
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  The evolution of lying in well-mixed populations.

Authors:  Valerio Capraro; Matjaž Perc; Daniele Vilone
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  The dishonest mind set in sequence.

Authors:  Anna Foerster; Robert Wirth; Wilfried Kunde; Roland Pfister
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-06-15

7.  The Difference Spotting Task: A new nonverbal measure of cheating behavior.

Authors:  Jinting Liu; Qiang Shen; Jieting Zhang; Urielle Beyens; Wei Cai; Jean Decety; Hong Li
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-03-10

8.  Response to anticipated reward in the nucleus accumbens predicts behavior in an independent test of honesty.

Authors:  Nobuhito Abe; Joshua D Greene
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Modulation of financial deprivation on deception and its neural correlates.

Authors:  Peng Sun; Xiaoli Ling; Li Zheng; Jia Chen; Lin Li; Zhiyuan Liu; Xuemei Cheng; Xiuyan Guo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Oxytocin promotes group-serving dishonesty.

Authors:  Shaul Shalvi; Carsten K W De Dreu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.