Literature DB >> 28765994

Modulation of financial deprivation on deception and its neural correlates.

Peng Sun1, Xiaoli Ling2, Li Zheng3,4, Jia Chen1, Lin Li5, Zhiyuan Liu6, Xuemei Cheng6, Xiuyan Guo7,4.   

Abstract

Deception is a universal phenomenon in human society and plays an important role in everyday life. Previous studies have revealed that people might have an internalized moral norm of keeping honest and the deceptive behavior was reliably correlated with activation in executive brain regions of prefrontal cortices to over-ride intuitive honest responses. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, this study sought to investigate how financial position modulated the neural responses during deceptive decision. Twenty-one participants were scanned when they played a series of adapted Dictator Game with different partners after a ball-guess game. Specifically, participants gained or lost money in the ball-guess game, and had opportunities to get more financial gains through cheating in the following adapted Dictator Game. Behavioral results indicated that participants did not cheat to the full extent; instead they were more likely to lie after losing money compared with gaining money. At the neural level, weaker activities in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortices were observed when participants lied after losing money than gaining money. Together, our data indicated that, people really had an internalized norm of keeping honest, but it would be lenient when people feel financial deprivation. And suppressing the truthful response originating from moral norm of keeping honest was associated with increased level of activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, but this association became weaker when people were under financial deprivation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deception; Financial deprivation; Moral norm; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28765994     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5052-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Neural correlates of different types of deception: an fMRI investigation.

Authors:  G Ganis; S M Kosslyn; S Stose; W L Thompson; D A Yurgelun-Todd
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Neural correlates of telling lies: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 Tesla.

Authors:  K Luan Phan; Alvaro Magalhaes; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Daniel A Fitzgerald; Christopher Green; Wilbur Smith
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Intentional false responding shares neural substrates with response conflict and cognitive control.

Authors:  Jennifer Maria Nuñez; B J Casey; Tobias Egner; Todd Hare; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-01-13       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  F Andrew Kozel; Kevin A Johnson; Qiwen Mu; Emily L Grenesko; Steven J Laken; Mark S George
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.

Authors:  Daniel D Langleben; James W Loughead; Warren B Bilker; Kosha Ruparel; Anna Rose Childress; Samantha I Busch; Ruben C Gur
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  The cognition of deception: the role of executive processes in producing lies.

Authors:  Victor A Gombos
Journal:  Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr       Date:  2006-08

7.  The neural circuitry of a broken promise.

Authors:  Thomas Baumgartner; Urs Fischbacher; Anja Feierabend; Kai Lutz; Ernst Fehr
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  The neurobiology of deception: evidence from neuroimaging and loss-of-function studies.

Authors:  Nobuhito Abe
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 9.  A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: evidence from functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  Sean A Spence; Mike D Hunter; Tom F D Farrow; Russell D Green; David H Leung; Catherine J Hughes; Venkatasubramanian Ganesan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Prefrontal connections express individual differences in intrinsic resistance to trading off honesty values against economic benefits.

Authors:  Azade Dogan; Yosuke Morishima; Felix Heise; Carmen Tanner; Rajna Gibson; Alexander F Wagner; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.

Authors:  Misato Inaba; Yumi Inoue; Satoshi Akutsu; Nobuyuki Takahashi; Toshio Yamagishi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Distinct Patterns of Cognitive Conflict Dynamics in Promise Keepers and Promise Breakers.

Authors:  Cinzia Calluso; Anne Saulin; Thomas Baumgartner; Daria Knoch
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.