Literature DB >> 22968640

Neural hijacking: action of high-frequency electrical stimulation on cortical circuits.

P D Cheney1, D M Griffin, G M Van Acker.   

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the brain was one of the first experimental methods applied to understanding brain organization and function and it continues as a highly useful method both in research and clinical applications. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) involves applying electrical stimuli through a microelectrode suitable for recording the action potentials of single neurons. ICMS can be categorized into single-pulse stimulation; high-frequency, short-duration stimulation; and high-frequency, long-duration stimulation. For clinical and experimental reasons, considerable interest focuses on the mechanism of neural activation by electrical stimuli. In this article, we discuss recent results suggesting that action potentials evoked in cortical neurons by high-frequency electrical stimulation do not sum with the natural, behaviorally related background activity; rather, high-frequency stimulation eliminates and replaces natural activity. We refer to this as neural hijacking. We propose that a major component of the mechanism underlying neural hijacking is excitation of axons by ICMS and elimination of natural spikes by antidromic collision with stimulus-driven spikes evoked at high frequency. Evidence also supports neural hijacking as an important mechanism underlying the action of deep brain stimulation in the subthalamic nucleus and its therapeutic effect in treating Parkinson's disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EMG; ICMS; electrical stimulation; motor cortex; neural hijacking

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22968640      PMCID: PMC3965182          DOI: 10.1177/1073858412458368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscientist        ISSN: 1073-8584            Impact factor:   7.519


  25 in total

1.  The mode of activation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical stimuli.

Authors:  E Jankowska; Y Padel; R Tanaka
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Movement representation in the dorsal and ventral premotor areas of owl monkeys: a microstimulation study.

Authors:  T M Preuss; I Stepniewska; J H Kaas
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1996-08-05       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter. I. Evidence from chronaxie measurements.

Authors:  L G Nowak; J Bullier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effects on muscle activity from microstimuli applied to somatosensory and motor cortex during voluntary movement in the monkey.

Authors:  G L Widener; P D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Comparable patterns of muscle facilitation evoked by individual corticomotoneuronal (CM) cells and by single intracortical microstimuli in primates: evidence for functional groups of CM cells.

Authors:  P D Cheney; E E Fetz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Excitation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical microstimulation: effective extent of stimulating current.

Authors:  S D Stoney; W D Thompson; H Asanuma
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Relationship between afferent input and motor outflow in cat motorsensory cortex.

Authors:  H Asanuma; S D Stoney; C Abzug
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Sizes and distributions of intrinsic neurons incorporating tritiated GABA in monkey sensory-motor cortex.

Authors:  S H Hendry; E G Jones
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter. II. Evidence from selective inactivation of cell bodies and axon initial segments.

Authors:  L G Nowak; J Bullier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects on wrist and digit muscle activity from microstimuli applied at the sites of rubromotoneuronal cells in primates.

Authors:  P D Cheney; K Mewes; G Widener
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  10 in total

1.  Equilibrium-based movement endpoints elicited from primary motor cortex using repetitive microstimulation.

Authors:  Gustaf M Van Acker; Sommer L Amundsen; William G Messamore; Hongyu Y Zhang; Carl W Luchies; Paul D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Muscle synergies obtained from comprehensive mapping of the primary motor cortex forelimb representation using high-frequency, long-duration ICMS.

Authors:  Sommer L Amundsen Huffmaster; Gustaf M Van Acker; Carl W Luchies; Paul D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy: circuits, targets, and trials.

Authors:  Nealen G Laxpati; Willard S Kasoff; Robert E Gross
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  EMG activation patterns associated with high frequency, long-duration intracortical microstimulation of primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Darcy M Griffin; Heather M Hudson; Abderraouf Belhaj-Saïf; Paul D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Differential Effects of Open- and Closed-Loop Intracortical Microstimulation on Firing Patterns of Neurons in Distant Cortical Areas.

Authors:  Alberto Averna; Valentina Pasquale; Maxwell D Murphy; Maria Piera Rogantin; Gustaf M Van Acker; Randolph J Nudo; Michela Chiappalone; David J Guggenmos
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Electrical Microstimulation of the Pulvinar Biases Saccade Choices and Reaction Times in a Time-Dependent Manner.

Authors:  Adan-Ulises Dominguez-Vargas; Lukas Schneider; Melanie Wilke; Igor Kagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Low Frequency Microstimulation Is Locally Excitatory in Patients With Epilepsy.

Authors:  Andrea Bartoli; Rémi Tyrand; Maria I Vargas; Shahan Momjian; Colette Boëx
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  The Duration of Motor Responses Evoked with Intracortical Microstimulation in Rats Is Primarily Modulated by Stimulus Amplitude and Train Duration.

Authors:  Meghan Watson; Mohamad Sawan; Numa Dancause
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Bilateral stereotactic lesions and chronic stimulation of the anterior thalamic nuclei for treatment of pharmacoresistant epilepsy.

Authors:  A R Sitnikov; Yu A Grigoryan; L P Mishnyakova
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-07-19

10.  Spatio-temporal characteristics of population responses evoked by microstimulation in the barrel cortex.

Authors:  Shany Nivinsky Margalit; Hamutal Slovin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.