Literature DB >> 9504844

Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter. II. Evidence from selective inactivation of cell bodies and axon initial segments.

L G Nowak1, J Bullier.   

Abstract

The results presented in the companion paper showed that extracellular electrical stimulation of the gray matter directly activates axons, but not cell bodies. The second set of experiments presented here was designed to separate the contribution of the axon initial segments and cell bodies from that of the axonal branches to the pool of presynaptic neuronal elements activated by electrical stimulation. For that purpose, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) iontophoresis was used to induce a selective inactivation of the cell body and of the adjoining portion of the axon by depolarization block, without affecting axonal branches that lack NMDA receptors. After NMDA iontophoresis, the neurons located near the iontophoresis electrode became unable to generate action potentials in an irreversible manner. When the NMDA-induced depolarization block was performed at the site of electrical stimulation, an unexpected increase in the amplitude of the orthodromic responses was observed. Several control experiments suggested that the field potential increase was due to changes of the local environment in the vicinity of the iontophoresis pipette, which led to an increased excitability of the axons. After the period of superexcitability, the orthodromic responses displayed an amplitude that was 15-20% lower than that observed before the NMDA-induced depolarization block, even though cell bodies and axon initial segment at the site of stimulation could not be activated by electrical stimulation. This result shows a low contribution for axon initial segments to the pool of neuronal elements activated by the electrical stimulation. Altogether, these experiments demonstrate that the postsynaptic responses obtained after electrical stimulation of the cortical gray matter result almost exclusively from the activation of axonal branches. Since the neocortex is organised as a network of local and long-range reciprocal connections, great attention must be paid to the interpretation of data obtained with electrical stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9504844     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  88 in total

1.  The effects of paranodal myelin damage on action potential depend on axonal structure.

Authors:  Ehsan Daneshi Kohan; Behnia Shadab Lashkari; Carolyn Jennifer Sparrey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  In vivo microstimulation with cathodic and anodic asymmetric waveforms modulates spatiotemporal calcium dynamics in cortical neuropil and pyramidal neurons of male mice.

Authors:  Kevin C Stieger; James R Eles; Kip A Ludwig; Takashi D Y Kozai
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.164

3.  The switch of subthalamic neurons from an irregular to a bursting pattern does not solely depend on their GABAergic inputs in the anesthetic-free rat.

Authors:  Nadia Urbain; Nicolas Rentéro; Damien Gervasoni; Bernard Renaud; Guy Chouvet
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Selective activation of neuronal targets with sinusoidal electric stimulation.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Donald K Eddington; Joseph F Rizzo; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Insights into cortical mechanisms of behavior from microstimulation experiments.

Authors:  Mark H Histed; Amy M Ni; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 6.  Network effects of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Ahmad Alhourani; Michael M McDowell; Michael J Randazzo; Thomas A Wozny; Efstathios D Kondylis; Witold J Lipski; Sarah Beck; Jordan F Karp; Avniel S Ghuman; R Mark Richardson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Mechanisms of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Todd M Herrington; Jennifer J Cheng; Emad N Eskandar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Current steering to activate targeted neural pathways during deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic region.

Authors:  Ashutosh Chaturvedi; Thomas J Foutz; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  High frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus modulates neurotransmission in limbic brain regions of the rat.

Authors:  Christine Winter; Christoph Lemke; Reinhard Sohr; Wassilios Meissner; Daniel Harnack; Georg Juckel; Rudolf Morgenstern; Andreas Kupsch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Studies of stimulus parameters for seizure disruption using neural network simulations.

Authors:  William S Anderson; Pawel Kudela; Jounhong Cho; Gregory K Bergey; Piotr J Franaszczuk
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 2.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.