Literature DB >> 8972443

Evaluation of the use of a new compact disc for auditory perceptual assessment in the elderly.

L E Humes1, M Coughlin, L Talley.   

Abstract

The present study examined the performance of 40 normal-hearing young adults and 38 elderly adults, some normal hearing and some hearing impaired, on the Department of Veterans Affairs' new compact disc (VA-CD) for auditory perceptual assessment. Principal-components factor analyses were performed on the test scores from each group of subjects with very similar results obtained from each group in terms of the number of factors identified (3), the percentage of variance explained by these factors individually and collectively (about 72%), and the association of various test scores with each factor. The 10 tests examined here were found to be associated with three underlying factors identified as a general speech-understanding ability (about 42% of variance), temporal sequencing capacity (about 18% of variance), and processing ability under conditions of dichotic competition (about 12% of variance). Among the elderly, hearing loss was strongly and negatively associated with general speech-recognition ability, whereas age was moderately associated with the other two factors. Test scores for several measures of auditory perceptual processing were negatively affected by the presence of peripheral hearing loss in the elderly even when administered at the highest recommended presentation level (90 dB SPL). In addition, some tests among those examined were found to have inadequate test-retest reliability for clinical use with the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8972443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  10 in total

1.  Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Kathryn S Schwartz; Colleen M Noe; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Age-related differences in sensitivity to small changes in frequency assessed with cortical evoked potentials.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; John H Mills; Ning-Ji He; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Methods and applications of the audibility index in hearing aid selection and fitting.

Authors:  Amyn M Amlani; Jerry L Punch; Teresa Y C Ching
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-09

4.  Prevalence and degree of hearing loss among males in Beaver Dam cohort: comparison of veterans and nonveterans.

Authors:  Richard H Wilson; Colleen M Noe; Karen J Cruickshanks; Terry L Wiley; David M Nondahl
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2010

5.  Longitudinal Decline on the Dichotic Digits Test.

Authors:  Lauren K Dillard; Mary E Fischer; Alex Pinto; Barbara E K Klein; Adam J Paulsen; Carla R Schubert; Michael Y Tsai; Theodore S Tweed; Karen J Cruickshanks
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  Dichotic Digits Test Performance Across the Ages: Results From Two Large Epidemiologic Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Mary E Fischer; Karen J Cruickshanks; David M Nondahl; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; James S Pankow; Ted S Tweed; Dayna S Dalton; Adam J Paulsen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Jennifer J Lister; Anthony T Cacace; Karen J Cruickshanks; George A Gates; Richard H Wilson; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Monotic auditory processing disorder tests in the older adult population.

Authors:  L Clarke Cox; Sandra L McCoy; Patricia A Tun; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Categorization of sentence recognition for older adults under noisy and time-altered conditions.

Authors:  Saea Kim; Sunmi Ma; Jihyeon Lee; Woojae Han
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Auditory and cognitive factors underlying individual differences in aided speech-understanding among older adults.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Gary R Kidd; Jennifer J Lentz
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.