Literature DB >> 22956797

Effect of afferent feedback and central motor commands on soleus H-reflex suppression during arm cycling.

S R Hundza1, Geoff C de Ruiter, M Klimstra, E Paul Zehr.   

Abstract

Suppression of soleus H-reflex amplitude in stationary legs is seen during rhythmic arm cycling. We examined the influence of various arm-cycling parameters on this interlimb reflex modulation to determine the origin of the effect. We previously showed the suppression to be graded with the frequency of arm cycling but not largely influenced by changes in peripheral input associated with crank length. Here, we more explicitly explored the contribution of afferent feedback related to arm movement on the soleus H-reflex suppression. We explored the influence of load and rate of muscle stretch by manipulating crank-load and arm-muscle vibration during arm cycling. Furthermore, internally driven ("Active") and externally driven ("Passive") arm cycling was compared. Soleus H-reflexes were evoked with tibial nerve stimulation during stationary control and rhythmic arm-cycling conditions, including: 1) six different loads; 2) with and without vibration to arm muscles; and 3) Active and Passive conditions. No significant differences were seen in the level of suppression between the different crank loads or between conditions with and without arm-muscle vibration. Furthermore, in contrast to the clear effect seen during active cycling, passive arm cycling did not significantly suppress the soleus H-reflex amplitude. Current results, in conjunction with previous findings, suggest that the afferent feedback examined in these studies is not the primary source responsible for soleus H-reflex suppression. Instead, it appears that central motor commands (supraspinal or spinal in origin) associated with frequency of arm cycling are relatively more dominant sources.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22956797     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00485.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  11 in total

1.  Modulation of corticospinal input to the legs by arm and leg cycling in people with incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  R Zhou; L Alvarado; S Kim; S L Chong; V K Mushahwar
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Intensity matters: effects of cadence and power output on corticospinal excitability during arm cycling are phase and muscle dependent.

Authors:  E J Lockyer; R J Benson; A P Hynes; L R Alcock; A J Spence; D C Button; K E Power
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Differences in corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii between arm cycling and tonic contraction are not evident at the immediate onset of movement.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Devin T G Philpott; Duane C Button; Kevin E Power
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Sherlock Holmes and the curious case of the human locomotor central pattern generator.

Authors:  Taryn Klarner; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neural mechanisms influencing interlimb coordination during locomotion in humans: presynaptic modulation of forearm H-reflexes during leg cycling.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Nakajima; Rinaldo A Mezzarane; Taryn Klarner; Trevor S Barss; Sandra R Hundza; Tomoyoshi Komiyama; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Short-Term Plasticity in a Monosynaptic Reflex Pathway to Forearm Muscles after Continuous Robot-Assisted Passive Stepping.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Nakajima; Kiyotaka Kamibayashi; Taku Kitamura; Tomoyoshi Komiyama; E Paul Zehr; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary commands on the spinal reflex excitability of remote limb muscles.

Authors:  Tatsuya Kato; Atsushi Sasaki; Hikaru Yokoyama; Matija Milosevic; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Neuromechanical interactions between the limbs during human locomotion: an evolutionary perspective with translation to rehabilitation.

Authors:  E P Zehr; Trevor S Barss; Katie Dragert; Alain Frigon; Erin V Vasudevan; Carlos Haridas; Sandra Hundza; Chelsea Kaupp; Taryn Klarner; Marc Klimstra; Tomoyoshi Komiyama; Pamela M Loadman; Rinaldo A Mezzarane; Tsuyoshi Nakajima; Gregory E P Pearcey; Yao Sun
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Repeated Bout Rate Enhancement Is Elicited by Various Forms of Finger Tapping.

Authors:  Anders Emanuelsen; Michael Voigt; Pascal Madeleine; Pia Kjær; Sebastian Dam; Nikolaj Koefoed; Ernst A Hansen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Effect of ankle stretching combined with arm cycling on the improvement of calf muscle stiffness in patients with stroke: a pilot study.

Authors:  Akira Ochi; Masahisa Fukumoto; Ryosuke Takami; Hiroshi Ohko; Takahiro Hayashi; Kazumasa Yamada
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.