| Literature DB >> 30349169 |
Akira Ochi1,2, Masahisa Fukumoto2, Ryosuke Takami3, Hiroshi Ohko1, Takahiro Hayashi1, Kazumasa Yamada1,2.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study aimed to ascertain whether ankle stretching combined with arm cycling compared with that without arm cycling results in greater improvement in maximum dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM), calf muscle stiffness, and gait velocity in the affected limb of patients with stroke. [Participants and Methods] Random ABAB reversal design was used in this study involving nine patients with stroke. Participants performed 10 min of ankle plantar flexor stretching through weight bearing using the tilt table under the following 2 conditions: with or without arm cycling at 60 revolutions per minute. Pre- and post-stretching maximum ROM and passive plantar flexion torque were measured using a custom-made passive torque indicator. Stiffness was calculated based on passive torque-angle relationships.Entities:
Keywords: Ankle stretching; Arm cycling; Stroke
Year: 2018 PMID: 30349169 PMCID: PMC6181649 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.30.1305
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Phys Ther Sci ISSN: 0915-5287
Baseline characteristics of the participants
| ID | Gender | BMI | Stroke characteristics | Time since stroke (week) | Paretic side | BRS | mRS | MAS |
| a | M | 22.6 | Ischemic | 10 | Rt | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| b | F | 24.0 | Ischemic | 12 | Lt | 4 | 3 | 1+ |
| c | F | 25.1 | Ischemic | 11 | Lt | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| d | M | 20.5 | Hemorrhagic | 6 | Rt | 4 | 2 | 1+ |
| e | F | 21.3 | Ischemic | 6 | Lt | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| f | F | 22.1 | Ischemic | 11 | Rt | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| g | M | 24.2 | Hemorrhagic | 9 | Rt | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| h | M | 22.0 | Hemorrhagic | 5 | Rt | 4 | 2 | 1+ |
| i | M | 25.4 | Ischemic | 8 | Lt | 3 | 2 | 2 |
M: male; F: female; BMI: body mass index; BRS: Brunnstrom recovery stage; mRS: modified Rankin Scale; MAS: modified Ashworth scale; Rt: right; Lt: left.
Fig. 1.Ankle stretching with added arm cycling (AAC) condition.
Pre-stretching data and rate of changes (pre- and post-stretching) in the four periods
| NAC day 1 | NAC day 2 | AAC day 1 | AAC day 2 | |
| Pre ROM (deg) | 18.1 ± 2.6 | 17.6 ± 3.1 | 18.3 ± 3.0 | 17.7 ± 4.0 |
| Post - Pre %change | 8.9 ± 5.1 ** | 11.7 ± 5.6 ** | 8.9 ± 4.7 ** | 14.0 ± 7.8 ** |
| Average value on days 1 and 2 (%) | 10.3 ± 5.2 | 11.4 ± 5.6 | ||
| Pre Stiffness (Nm/rad) | 49.9 ± 15.9 | 49.1 ± 15.4 | 51.6 ± 17.6 | 49.0 ± 12.6 |
| Post - Pre %change | −8.0 ± 8.0 ** | −7.9 ± 8.0 ** | −20.7 ± 7.5 ** | −24.2 ± 9.4 ** |
| Average value on days 1 and 2 (%) | −7.9 ± 8.1 | −16.8 ± 4.1 † | ||
| Pre Gait velocity (m/s) | 0.73 ± 0.39 | 0.77 ± 0.36 | 0.77 ± 0.35 | 0.80 ± 0.36 |
| Post - Pre %change | 5.9 ± 8.8 | 0.3 ± 11.5 | 1.2 ± 3.6 | 1.3 ± 3.0 |
| Average value on days 1 and 2 (%) | 3.1 ± 7.7 | 1.2 ± 2.6 | ||
Data were presented as mean ± standard deviations. ROM: maximum range of motion for ankle dorsiflexion in the affected limb; NAC: non-use arm cycling condition; AAC: added arm cycling condition.
**p<0.01 significant difference for pre- vs. post-stretching.
†p<0.05 significant difference for NAC vs. AAC (average value on days 1 and 2).