Literature DB >> 22956443

Quality of life among obese patients seeking weight loss surgery: the importance of obesity-related social stigma and functional status.

Christina C Wee1, Roger B Davis, Karen W Huskey, Daniel B Jones, Mary B Hamel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a stigmatizing condition associated with adverse psychosocial consequences. The relative importance of weight stigma in reducing health utility or the value a person places on their current health state is unknown.
METHODS: We conducted a telephone survey of patients with obesity. All were seeking weight loss surgery at two bariatric centers (70 % response rate). We assessed patients' health utility (preference-based quality life measure) via a series of standard gamble scenarios assessing patients' willingness to risk death to lose various amounts of weight or achieve perfect health (range 0 to 1; 0 = death and 1 = most valued health/weight state). Multivariable models assessed associations among quality of life domains from the Short-form 36 (SF-36) and Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-lite (IWQOL-lite) and patients' health utility.
RESULTS: Our study sample (n = 574) had a mean body mass index of 46.5 kg/m(2) and a mean health utility of 0.87, reflecting the group's average willingness to accept a 13 % risk of death to achieve their most desired health/weight state; utilities were highly variable, however, with 10 % reporting a utility of 1.00 and 27 % reporting a utility lower than 0.90. Among the IWQOL-lite subscales, Public Distress and Work Life were the only two subscales significantly associated with patients' utility after adjustment for sociodemographic factors. Among the SF-36 subscales, Role Physical, Physical Functioning, and Role Emotional were significantly associated with patients' utility. When the leading subscales on both IWQOL-lite and SF-36 were considered together, Role Physical, Public Distress, and to a lesser degree Role Emotional remained independently associated with patients' health utility.
CONCLUSION: Patients seeking weight loss surgery report health utilities similar to those reported for people living with diabetes or with laryngeal cancer; however, utility values varied widely with more than a quarter of patients willing to accept more than a 10 % risk of death to achieve their most valued health/weight state. Interference with role functioning due to physical limitations and obesity-related social stigma were strong determinants of reduced health utility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22956443      PMCID: PMC3614124          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2188-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  28 in total

1.  Assessing the value of weight loss among primary care patients.

Authors:  Christina C Wee; Mary B Hamel; Roger B Davis; Russell S Phillips
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Utility values for obesity and preliminary analysis of the Health Outcomes Data Repository.

Authors:  Simon Dixon; Craig J Currie; Phil McEwan
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 3.  Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults--The Evidence Report. National Institutes of Health.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  1998-09

Review 4.  Bias, discrimination, and obesity.

Authors:  R Puhl; K D Brownell
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2001-12

5.  Construct validity of the Short Form-36 Health Survey and its relationship with BMI in obese outpatients.

Authors:  Francesco Corica; Andrea Corsonello; Giovanni Apolone; Maria Lucchetti; Nazario Melchionda; Giulio Marchesini
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of U.S. adults.

Authors:  Eugenia E Calle; Carmen Rodriguez; Kimberly Walker-Thurmond; Michael J Thun
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  BMI and cervical cancer screening among white, African-American, and Hispanic women in the United States.

Authors:  Christina C Wee; Russell S Phillips; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2005-07

8.  Assessing Impact of Weight on Quality of Life.

Authors:  R L Kolotkin; S Head; M Hamilton; C K Tse
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  1995-01

9.  Body mass index and quality of well-being in a community of older adults.

Authors:  Erik J Groessl; Robert M Kaplan; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Theodore G Ganiats
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  One-year health-related quality of life outcomes in weight loss trial participants: comparison of three measures.

Authors:  Ronette L Kolotkin; Josephine M Norquist; Ross D Crosby; Shailaja Suryawanshi; Pedro J Teixeira; Steven B Heymsfield; Ngozi Erondu; Allison M Nguyen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  32 in total

1.  Obese Adolescents Report Better Health-Related Quality of Life than Obese Young Adults.

Authors:  John B Dixon; Toni L Rice; Elisabeth A Lambert; Gavin W Lambert
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Weight bias and stigmatisation: what is it and what can we do about it?

Authors:  Elizabeth Ewing
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Quality of Life After Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Laura M Mazer; Dan E Azagury; John M Morton
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2017-06

4.  Stigma perceptions in patients with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders.

Authors:  L Guadagnoli; T H Taft; L Keefer
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.429

5.  Sex, race, and the adverse effects of social stigma vs. other quality of life factors among primary care patients with moderate to severe obesity.

Authors:  Christina C Wee; Roger B Davis; Sarah Chiodi; Karen W Huskey; Mary B Hamel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The hidden cost of an extensive preoperative work-up: predictors of attrition after referral for bariatric surgery in a universal healthcare system.

Authors:  Aristithes G Doumouras; Yung Lee; Glenda Babe; Scott Gmora; Jean-Eric Tarride; Dennis Hong; Mehran Anvari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Obesity stigma as a determinant of poor birth outcomes in women with high BMI: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Sharon Bernecki DeJoy; Krystle Bittner
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-04

Review 8.  Mindset and Communication Barriers in the Diffusion of Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Gero; Bors Hulesch; Marco Bueter
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 9.  Patient and Referring Practitioner Characteristics Associated With the Likelihood of Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Luke M Funk; Sally Jolles; Laura E Fischer; Corrine I Voils
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  A mindfulness-based intervention to control weight after bariatric surgery: Preliminary results from a randomized controlled pilot trial.

Authors:  Sara A Chacko; Gloria Y Yeh; Roger B Davis; Christina C Wee
Journal:  Complement Ther Med       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.