Literature DB >> 16076999

BMI and cervical cancer screening among white, African-American, and Hispanic women in the United States.

Christina C Wee1, Russell S Phillips, Ellen P McCarthy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We examined cervical cancer screening by BMI in white, African-American, and Hispanic women and explored women's reasons for not undergoing screening. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We used logistic regression to examine Pap testing in the preceding 3 years across BMI groups for white (n = 6419), African-American (n = 1715), and Hispanic women (n = 1859) age 18 to 75 years who responded to the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. We used bivariable analyses to describe women's reasons for not undergoing testing and examined whether unscreened women received physician recommendations for screening.
RESULTS: Of 12,170 women, 50% were normal weight, 26% were overweight, and 21% were obese. The proportion who reported Pap testing in the last 3 years was 86% in whites, 88% in African Americans, and 78% in Hispanics. After adjustment for sociodemographics, health care access, and illness burden, severely obese white women (BMI = 40+ kg/m2) were significantly less likely to undergo Pap testing (relative risk, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.99) compared with normal weight women. BMI was not associated with screening in African Americans or Hispanics. A higher proportion of obese white women than normal weight women cited putting off the test or embarrassment or discomfort as the primary reason for not undergoing screening. Among the unscreened, obese women were as likely as normal weight women to receive a physician recommendation to undergo screening. DISCUSSION: Disparities in cervical cancer screening by body weight persist for white women with severe obesity. Disparities were not explained by differences in the rate of physician recommendations for screening, but obese white women may be more likely to delay screening or to find screening painful, uncomfortable, or embarrassing than normal weight white women. Efforts to increase screening among obese women should address women's reservations about screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16076999     DOI: 10.1038/oby.2005.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Res        ISSN: 1071-7323


  33 in total

1.  Avoiding piecemeal research on participation in cervical cancer screening: the advantages of a social identity framework.

Authors:  Candice Tribe; Janine Webb
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Papanicolaou testing among women in the southern United States.

Authors:  Neeraja B Peterson; Harvey J Murff; Yong Cui; Margaret Hargreaves; Jay H Fowke
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Patient and provider factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in safety net clinics serving low-income, urban immigrant Latinos.

Authors:  Maria Lopez-Class; Gheorghe Luta; Anne-Michelle Noone; Janet Canar; Claire Selksy; Elmer Huerta; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-08

4.  Use of complementary and alternative therapies by overweight and obese adults.

Authors:  Suzanne M Bertisch; Christina C Wee; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  Family physicians' barriers to cancer screening in extremely obese patients.

Authors:  Jeanne M Ferrante; Denise C Fyffe; Marielos L Vega; Alicja K Piasecki; Pamela A Ohman-Strickland; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  Self-report versus medical records for assessing cancer-preventive services delivery.

Authors:  Jeanne M Ferrante; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Karissa A Hahn; Shawna V Hudson; Eric K Shaw; Jesse C Crosson; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 7.  The association of obesity and cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nisa M Maruthur; Shari D Bolen; Frederick L Brancati; Jeanne M Clark
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines for U.S. women aged 25-64: data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS).

Authors:  Wendy Nelson; Richard P Moser; Allison Gaffey; William Waldron
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Association between obesity and bacterial vaginosis as assessed by Nugent score.

Authors:  Rita T Brookheart; Warren G Lewis; Jeffrey F Peipert; Amanda L Lewis; Jenifer E Allsworth
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Racial/Ethnic Differences Affecting Adherence to Cancer Screening Guidelines Among Women.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Hirth; Tabassum Haque Laz; Mahbubur Rahman; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.