Literature DB >> 22956020

Grassroots origins, national engagement: exploring the professionalization of practicing healthcare ethicists in Canada.

Andrea Frolic1.   

Abstract

Canadian ethicists have a long legacy of leadership in advocating for standards and quality in healthcare ethics. Continuing this tradition, a grassroots organization of practicing healthcare ethicists (PHEs) concerned about the lack of standardization in the field recently formed to explore potential options related to professionalization. This group calls itself "practicing healthcare ethicists exploring professionalization" (PHEEP). This paper provides a description of the process by which PHEEP has begun to engage the Canadian PHE community in the development of practice standards and related projects. By making our process and its ethical and cultural underpinnings transparent, we hope to prompt PHEs around the world to reflect on the importance of context, process and principles (not just outcomes) in the exploration of and possible movement towards professionalization. By sharing some of our key successes and challenges, we also hope to inspire our colleagues to recognize the value in developing practice standards and to contribute to this endeavor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22956020     DOI: 10.1007/s10730-012-9192-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HEC Forum        ISSN: 0956-2737


  8 in total

1.  Exploring a model role description for ethicists.

Authors:  Paula Chidwick; Jennifer Bell; Eoin Connolly; Michael D Coughlin; Andrea Frolic; Laurie Hardingham; Randi Zlotnik Shaul
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2010-03

2.  A pilot qualitative study of "conflicts of interests and/or conflicting interests" among Canadian bioethicists. Part 1: Five cases, experiences and lessons learned.

Authors:  Andrea Frolic; Paula Chidwick
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2010-03

3.  A pilot qualitative study of "conflicts of interests and/or conflicting interests" among Canadian bioethicists. Part 2: Defining and managing conflicts.

Authors:  Andrea Frolic; Paula Chidwick
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2010-03

4.  Project examining effectiveness in clinical ethics (PEECE): phase 1-- descriptive analysis of nine clinical ethics services.

Authors:  M D Godkin; K Faith; R E G Upshur; S K Macrae; C S Tracy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  The benefits of practice standards and other practice-defining texts: and why healthcare ethicists ought to explore them.

Authors:  Kevin Reel
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-09

6.  Getting engaged: exploring professionalization in Canada. Introduction to this issue.

Authors:  Christy Simpson
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-09

7.  Evolution of hospital clinical ethics committees in Canada.

Authors:  Alice Gaudine; Linda Thorne; Sandra M LeFort; Marianne Lamb
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Deliberative engagement: an inclusive methodology for exploring professionalization.

Authors:  Jeffrey Kirby; Christy Simpson
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-09
  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  The benefits of practice standards and other practice-defining texts: and why healthcare ethicists ought to explore them.

Authors:  Kevin Reel
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-09

2.  Getting engaged: exploring professionalization in Canada. Introduction to this issue.

Authors:  Christy Simpson
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-09

3.  Philosophy of Healthcare Ethics Practice Statements: Quality Attestation and Beyond.

Authors:  Lauren Notini
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2018-12

4.  Mapping our practice? Some conceptual "bumps" for us to consider.

Authors:  Christy Simpson
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-09

5.  Deliberative engagement: an inclusive methodology for exploring professionalization.

Authors:  Jeffrey Kirby; Christy Simpson
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-09

6.  Conceptualizing boundaries for the professionalization of healthcare ethics practice: a call for empirical research.

Authors:  Nancy C Brown; Summer Johnson McGee
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2014-12

7.  Lessons learned from implementing a responsive quality assessment of clinical ethics support.

Authors:  Eva M Van Baarle; Marieke C Potma; Maria E C van Hoek; Laura A Hartman; Bert A C Molewijk; Jelle L P van Gurp
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.652

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.