Literature DB >> 24973870

Conceptualizing boundaries for the professionalization of healthcare ethics practice: a call for empirical research.

Nancy C Brown1, Summer Johnson McGee.   

Abstract

One of the challenges of modern healthcare ethics practice is the navigation of boundaries. Practicing healthcare ethicists in the performance of their role must navigate meanings, choices, decisions and actions embedded in complex cultural and social relationships amongst diverse individuals. In light of the evolving state of modern healthcare ethics practice and the recent move toward professionalization via certification, understanding boundary navigation in healthcare ethics practice is critical. Because healthcare ethics is endowed with many boundaries which often delineate concerns about professional expertise and authority, epistemological reflection on the relationship between theory and practice points toward the social context as relevant to the conceptualization of boundaries. The skills of social scientists may prove helpful to provide data and insights into the conceptualization and navigation of clinical ethics qua profession. Empirical ethics research, which combines empirical description (usually social scientific) with normative-ethical analysis and reflection, is a way forward as we engage and reflect upon issues which have implications for practice standards and professionalization of the role. This requires cooperative engagement of the descriptive and normative disciplines to explore our understandings of boundaries in healthcare ethics practice. This will contribute to the ongoing reflection not only as we envision the professional role but to ensure that it is enacted in practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24973870     DOI: 10.1007/s10730-014-9240-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HEC Forum        ISSN: 0956-2737


  44 in total

1.  Empirical research in medical ethics: an introduction.

Authors:  Robert M Arnold; Lachlan Forrow
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1993-09

2.  What can the social sciences contribute to the study of ethics? Theoretical, empirical and substantive considerations.

Authors:  Erica Haimes
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  Whose morality is it anyway? Thoughts on the work of Margaret Urban Walker.

Authors:  Elizabeth Peter; Joan Liaschenko
Journal:  Nurs Philos       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.279

4.  How can we help? From "sociology in" to "sociology of" bioethics.

Authors:  Raymond De Vries
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  The bioethics consultant: giving moral advice in the midst of moral controversy.

Authors:  H Tristram Engelhardt
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2003-12

6.  A pilot qualitative study of "conflicts of interests and/or conflicting interests" among Canadian bioethicists. Part 2: Defining and managing conflicts.

Authors:  Andrea Frolic; Paula Chidwick
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2010-03

7.  The birth of the empirical turn in bioethics.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Paul Schotsmans; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.898

8.  What 'empirical turn in bioethics'?

Authors:  Samia Hurst
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.898

9.  500 hats: exploring the challenges of boundary and community--reflections on professionalization.

Authors:  Ann Heesters
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-09

10.  Structuring a written examination to assess ASBH health care ethics consultation core knowledge competencies.

Authors:  Bruce D White; Jane B Jankowski; Wayne N Shelton
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

View more
  2 in total

1.  Today´s medical self and the other: Challenges and evolving solutions for enhanced humanization and quality of care.

Authors:  Perla Sueiras; Victoria Romano-Betech; Alejandro Vergil-Salgado; Adalberto de Hoyos; Silvia Quintana-Vargas; William Ruddick; Anaclara Castro-Santana; Sergio Islas-Andrade; Nelly F Altamirano-Bustamante; Myriam M Altamirano-Bustamante
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Appealing to Tacit Knowledge and Axiology to Enhance Medical Practice in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Hermeneutic Bioethical Analysis.

Authors:  Ana-Beatriz Serrano-Zamago; Myriam M Altamirano-Bustamante
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-12-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.