Literature DB >> 22886153

Mapping our practice? Some conceptual "bumps" for us to consider.

Christy Simpson1.   

Abstract

There are several important conceptual issues and questions about the practice of healthcare ethics that can, and should, inform the development of any practice standards. This paper provides a relatively short overview of seven of these issues, with the invitation for further critical reflection and examination of their relevance to and implications for practice standards. The seven issues described include: diversity (from the perspective of training and experience); moral expertise and authority/influence; being an insider or outsider; flexibility and adaptability (for local contexts of practice); the relative weighting of procedural and normative aspects of ethics practice; making mistakes or errors; and conflicts of interest in practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22886153     DOI: 10.1007/s10730-012-9188-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HEC Forum        ISSN: 0956-2737


  14 in total

1.  The Olivieri debacle: where were the heroes of bioethics?

Authors:  F Baylis
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Exploring a model role description for ethicists.

Authors:  Paula Chidwick; Jennifer Bell; Eoin Connolly; Michael D Coughlin; Andrea Frolic; Laurie Hardingham; Randi Zlotnik Shaul
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2010-03

3.  A pilot qualitative study of "conflicts of interests and/or conflicting interests" among Canadian bioethicists. Part 1: Five cases, experiences and lessons learned.

Authors:  Andrea Frolic; Paula Chidwick
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2010-03

4.  A pilot qualitative study of "conflicts of interests and/or conflicting interests" among Canadian bioethicists. Part 2: Defining and managing conflicts.

Authors:  Andrea Frolic; Paula Chidwick
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2010-03

5.  Looking backwards, looking forward: hopes for bioethics' next twenty-five years.

Authors:  Susan Sherwin
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.898

6.  Resisting the tide of professionalization: valuing diversity in bioethics.

Authors:  Alan C Regenberg; Debra J H Mathews
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 11.229

7.  The benefits of practice standards and other practice-defining texts: and why healthcare ethicists ought to explore them.

Authors:  Kevin Reel
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-09

8.  Credentialing strategically ambiguous and heterogeneous social skills: the emperor without clothes.

Authors:  H Tristram Engelhardt
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2009-09

Review 9.  Authority in ethics consultation.

Authors:  G J Agich
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.718

10.  Grassroots origins, national engagement: exploring the professionalization of practicing healthcare ethicists in Canada.

Authors:  Andrea Frolic
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-09
View more
  5 in total

1.  Towards Substantive Standardization: Ethical Rules as Ethical Presumptions.

Authors:  Benjamin Chan
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2016-06

2.  The benefits of practice standards and other practice-defining texts: and why healthcare ethicists ought to explore them.

Authors:  Kevin Reel
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-09

3.  Getting engaged: exploring professionalization in Canada. Introduction to this issue.

Authors:  Christy Simpson
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2012-09

4.  Conceptualizing boundaries for the professionalization of healthcare ethics practice: a call for empirical research.

Authors:  Nancy C Brown; Summer Johnson McGee
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2014-12

5.  Theory and practice of integrative clinical ethics support: a joint experience within gender affirmative care.

Authors:  Laura Hartman; Giulia Inguaggiato; Guy Widdershoven; Annelijn Wensing-Kruger; Bert Molewijk
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.652

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.