Literature DB >> 22953755

Hypo- and hyperglycemia in relation to the mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and nature of the glucose distribution.

David Rodbard1.   

Abstract

AIMS: We describe a new approach to estimate the risks of hypo- and hyperglycemia based on the mean and SD of the glucose distribution using optional transformations of the glucose scale to achieve a more nearly symmetrical and Gaussian distribution, if necessary. We examine the correlation of risks of hypo- and hyperglycemia calculated using different glucose thresholds and the relationships of these risks to the mean glucose, SD, and percentage coefficient of variation (%CV).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using representative continuous glucose monitoring datasets, one can predict the risk of glucose values above or below any arbitrary threshold if the glucose distribution is Gaussian or can be transformed to be Gaussian. Symmetry and gaussianness can be tested objectively and used to optimize the transformation.
RESULTS: The method performs well with excellent correlation of predicted and observed risks of hypo- or hyperglycemia for individual subjects by time of day or for a specified range of dates. One can compare observed and calculated risks of hypo- and hyperglycemia for a series of thresholds considering their uncertainties. Thresholds such as 80 mg/dL can be used as surrogates for thresholds such as 50 mg/dL. We observe a high correlation of risk of hypoglycemia with %CV and illustrate the theoretical basis for that relationship.
CONCLUSIONS: One can estimate the historical risks of hypo- and hyperglycemia by time of day, date, day of the week, or range of dates, using any specified thresholds. Risks of hypoglycemia with one threshold (e.g., 80 mg/dL) can be used as an effective surrogate marker for hypoglycemia at other thresholds (e.g., 50 mg/dL). These estimates of risk can be useful in research studies and in the clinical care of patients with diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22953755     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2012.0062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  21 in total

Review 1.  Metrics Beyond Hemoglobin A1C in Diabetes Management: Time in Range, Hypoglycemia, and Other Parameters.

Authors:  Lorena Alarcon-Casas Wright; Irl B Hirsch
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 2.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Recent Studies Demonstrating Improved Glycemic Outcomes.

Authors:  David Rodbard
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Long-Term Improvement in Glucose Control and Counterregulation by Islet Transplantation for Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Michael R Rickels; Amy J Peleckis; Eileen Markmann; Cornelia Dalton-Bakes; Stephanie M Kong; Karen L Teff; Ali Naji
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Hypoglycemia prediction using machine learning models for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Bharath Sudharsan; Malinda Peeples; Mansur Shomali
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-14

5.  Evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system with automatic high- and low-pattern recognition software in insulin-using patients: pattern detection and patient-reported insights.

Authors:  Mike Grady; Denise Campbell; Kirsty MacLeod; Aparna Srinivasan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-01

6.  Recommendations for standardizing glucose reporting and analysis to optimize clinical decision making in diabetes: the ambulatory glucose profile.

Authors:  Richard M Bergenstal; Andrew J Ahmann; Timothy Bailey; Roy W Beck; Joan Bissen; Bruce Buckingham; Larry Deeb; Robert H Dolin; Satish K Garg; Robin Goland; Irl B Hirsch; David C Klonoff; Davida F Kruger; Glenn Matfin; Roger S Mazze; Beth A Olson; Christopher Parkin; Anne Peters; Margaret A Powers; Henry Rodriguez; Phil Southerland; Ellie S Strock; William Tamborlane; David M Wesley
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-01

7.  Consistency of quantitative scores of hypoglycemia severity and glycemic lability and comparison with continuous glucose monitoring system measures in long-standing type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Peter A Senior; Melena D Bellin; Rodolfo Alejandro; Jon W Yankey; William R Clarke; Julie C Qidwai; Traci R Schwieger; Thomas L Eggerman; Mark A Robien; Michael R Rickels
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Performance of an Electronic Diary System for Intensive Insulin Management in Global Diabetes Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Edward J Bastyr; Shuyu Zhang; Jiani Mou; Andy P Hackett; Stephen A Raymond; Annette M Chang
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Beyond A1C-Standardization of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Reporting: Why It Is Needed and How It Continues to Evolve.

Authors:  Roy W Beck; Richard M Bergenstal
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2021-05-25

10.  Defining the target value of the coefficient of variation by continuous glucose monitoring in Chinese people with diabetes.

Authors:  Yifei Mo; Xiaojing Ma; Jingyi Lu; Yun Shen; Yufei Wang; Lei Zhang; Wei Lu; Wei Zhu; Yuqian Bao; Jian Zhou
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.232

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.